Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-xt4p2 Total loading time: 0.777 Render date: 2022-05-28T01:37:25.618Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
Journal of Child Language Journal of Child Language

Article contents

Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

SUSANNAH V. LEVI
SUSANNAH V. LEVI*
Affiliation:
New York University
*
Address for correspondence: Susannah Levi, New York University, Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, 665 Broadway, 9th floor, New York, NY 10012.
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research with adults has shown that spoken language processing is improved when listeners are familiar with talkers' voices, known as the familiar talker advantage. The current study explored whether this ability extends to school-age children, who are still acquiring language. Children were familiarized with the voices of three German–English bilingual talkers and were tested on the speech of six bilinguals, three of whom were familiar. Results revealed that children do show improved spoken language processing when they are familiar with the talkers, but this improvement was limited to highly familiar lexical items. This restriction of the familiar talker advantage is attributed to differences in the representation of highly familiar and less familiar lexical items. In addition, children did not exhibit accent-general learning; despite having been exposed to German-accented talkers during training, there was no improvement for novel German-accented talkers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 843 - 872
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported by a grant from the NIH-NIDCD (1R03DC009851-01A2). I would like to thank Gabrielle Alfano, Josh Barocas, Jennifer Bruno, Stephanie Lee, Emma Mack, Alexandra Muratore, Sydney Robert, and Margo Waltz for help with data collection, Adam Buchwald and Richard Schwartz for comments on previous versions of this paper, and the children and families for their participation.

References

Allen, J. S. & Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115, 3171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, B. A. & Newman, R. S. (2004). Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition 94, B45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartholomeus, B. (1973). Voice identification by nursery school children. Canadian Journal of Psychology 27(4), 464–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2010). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Online: <http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/>..>Google Scholar
Benkí, J. (2003). Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113(3), 1689–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bent, T. (2014). Children's perception of foreign-accented words. Journal of Child Language (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1993). Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of native and non-native speech: a window on early phonological development. In de Boysson, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., McNeilage, P. & Morton, J. (eds), Developmental neurocognition: speech and face processing during the first year of life, 289–304. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R. & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 106(2), 707–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J. & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). TONI-3: test of nonverbal intelligence, 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Carle, E. (1969). The very hungry caterpillar. New York, NY: Philomel Books.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. M. & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(6), 3647–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, C. G. & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Language and Speech 47(3), 207–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortese, M. J. & Khanna, M. M. (2008). Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods 40(3), 791–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creel, S. C., Aslin, R. N. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access. Cognition 106, 633–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creel, S. C. & Jimenez, S. R. (2012). Differences in talker recognition by preschoolers and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 113, 487–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisner, F. & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 224–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felty, R. A. (2007). Context effects in spoken word recognition of English and German by native and non-native listeners. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Fennell, C. T. & Werker, J. F. (2003). Early word learners' ability to access phonetic detail in well-known words. Language and Speech 46(2/3), 245–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B. & Logan, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects in recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17(1), 152–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jesse, A., McQueen, J. M. & Page, M. (2007). The locus of talker-specific effects in spoken-word recognition. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. J. (eds), International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007), 1921–4. Dudweiler: Pirrot.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1986). Toward a model of the development of speech perception. In Perkell, J. S. & Klatt, D. H. (eds), Invariance and variability in speech processes, 1–19. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W. (1992). Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Phonological development: models, research, implications, 17–64. Parkton, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Kraljic, T., Brennan, S. E. & Samuel, A. G. (2008). Accommodating variation: dialects, idiolects, and speech processing. Cognition 107, 54–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraljic, T. & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple talkers. Journal of Memory and Language 56, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kučera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N. & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255, 606–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, S. V. & Schwartz, R. G. (2013). The development of language-specific and language-independent talker processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56, 913–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, S. V., Winters, S. J. & Pisoni, D. B. (2007). Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 2327–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, S. V., Winters, S. J. & Pisoni, D. B. (2011). Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: Whose familiar voices are more intelligible? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(6), 4053–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. A., Diamond, R. & Carey, S. (1979). Development of voice recognition: parallels with face recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 27, 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, D. & Hazan, V. (2004). The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 725–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, C. T. & Luce, P. A. (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(2), 306–21.Google ScholarPubMed
McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A. & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science 30(6), 1113–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory & Cognition 25(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, M., Feigenson, L. & Halberda, J. (2010). A one-to-one bias and fast mapping support preschoolers’ learning about faces and voices. Cognitive Science 34(5), 719–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 519–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. B. & Soli, S. (2000). Acoustical barriers to learning: children at risk in every classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing Research Services in Schools 31, 356–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, R. S. & Evers, S. (2007). The effect of talker familiarity on stream segregation. Journal of Phonetics 35, 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M. & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47, 204–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, L. C. & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 60(3), 355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S. & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science 5(1), 42–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D. & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(2), 309–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Samuel, A. G. & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71(6), 1207–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacter, D. L. & Church, B. A. (1992). Auditory priming: implicit and explicit memory for words and voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(5), 915–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmale, R., Cristia, A. & Seidl, A. (2012). Toddlers recognize words in an unfamiliar accent after brief exposure. Developmental Science 15(6), 732–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmale, R. & Seidl, A. (2009). Accommodating variability in voice and foreign accent: flexibility of early word representations. Developmental Science 12(4), 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A. & Zuccolotto, A. (2007). E-Prime 2·0 Professional. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
Schroeder, M. R. (1968). Reference signal for signal quality studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44, 1735–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H. & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 4th ed. (CELF-4). Toronto, CA: Psychological Corporation/A Harcourt Assessment Company.Google Scholar
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D. & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 3306–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sjerps, M. J., Mitterer, H. & McQueen, J. M. (2011). Listening to different speakers: on the time-course of perceptual compensation for vocal-tract characteristics. Neuropsychologia 49, 3831–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, M. J., Rollins, P. R. & Jerger, S. (2002). Children's recognition of cartoon voices. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 45(1), 214–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stager, C. L. & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception tasks than in word-learning tasks. Nature 388, 381–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2013). A corpus of consonant–vowel–consonant real words and nonwords: comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1159–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. & Hoover, J. R. (2010). An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods 42(2), 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumby, W. H. & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26(2), 212–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 76, 147–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80(5), 352–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Heugten, M. & Johnson, E. K. (2014). Learning to contend with accents in infancy: benefits of brief speaker exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(1), 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. & Donoso, A. (2011). Processing of indexical information requires time: evidence from change deafness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64(8), 1484–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walley, A. C. (1993). The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review 13(3), 286–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F. & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. S. & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Adaptation to novel accents by toddlers. Developmental Science 14(2), 372–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, K. S. & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. S., Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E. & Morgan, J. L. (2013). Adults show less sensitivity to phonetic detail in unfamiliar words, too. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 362–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonan, C. A. & Sommers, M. S. (2000). The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners. Psychology and Aging 15(1), 88–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *