Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Age and learning environment: Are children implicit second language learners?*

  • KAREN LICHTMAN (a1)
Abstract

Children are thought to learn second languages (L2s) using primarily implicit mechanisms, in contrast to adults, who primarily rely on explicit language learning. This difference is usually attributed to cognitive maturation, but adults also receive more explicit instruction than children, which may influence their learning strategies. This study crosses instruction condition with age, teaching forty children aged 5;3 to 7;11 and forty adults an artificial mini-language under implicit or explicit training conditions. Participants produced novel sentences and judged sentence grammaticality equally well in either condition, but both children and adults in the explicit training condition developed greater awareness of the mini-language's structures – and greater awareness was associated with better performance for both age groups. Results show that explicit instruction affects children and adults in the same way, supporting the hypothesis that age differences in implicit vs. explicit L2 learning are not exclusively caused by maturation, but also influenced by instruction.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Karen Lichtman, Department of Foreign Languages & Literatures, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115. e-mail: klichtman@niu.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
*

This research was supported by National Science Foundation Linguistics program grant BCS-1122629. Many thanks to all of the after-school program staff, parents, and students who helped with the study; research assistant Jeremy Schmidt; and Tania Ionin, Silvina Montrul, Melissa Bowles, and Pam Hadley for their input.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Bialystok, E. (1994). Representation and ways of knowing: three issues in second language acquisition. In Ellis, N. C. (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 549–69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Birdsong, D. (ed.) (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence (Vol. 25). London: Springer Science & Business Media.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20, 349.
Blom, E. (2008). Testing the domain-by-age model: inflection and placement of Dutch verbs. In Haznedar, B. & Gavruseva, E. (eds), Current trends in child second language acquisition: a generative perspective (pp. 271300). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Curtain, H. & Dahlberg, C. A. (2010). Languages and children: making the match. New languages for young learners, grades K-8. New York: Pearson.
de Graaf, R. (1997). The eXperanto eXperiment: effects of explicit instruction on L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 249–76.
DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: an experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17, 379410.
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22, 499533.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (eds), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–48). Oxford: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I. & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 31(3), 413–38.
DeKeyser, R. & Larson-Hall, J. (2005) What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. D. (eds), Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 4th edn (PPVT™−4). Johannesburg: Pearson Education Inc.
Ebbels, S. (2007). Teaching grammar to school-aged children with specific language impairment using Shape Coding. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 23(1), 6793.
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: a psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 141–72.
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge, and instruction. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Philp, R. & Reinders, H. (eds), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 325). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Ferman, S. & Karni, A. (2010). No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule. PLOS One 5(10), 110.
Finestack, L. & Fey, M. (2009). Evaluation of a deductive procedure to teach grammatical inflections to children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 18, 289302.
Harley, B., Howard, J. & Hart, D. (1998). Grammar in grade 2: an instructional experiment in primary French immersion. In Lapkin, S. (ed.), French second language education in Canada: empirical studies (pp. 177–93). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Housen, A. & Pierrard, M. (2006). Investigating instructed second language acquisition. In Housen, A. & Pierrard, M. (eds), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 127). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hudson Kam, C. L. & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: when learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 59, 3066.
Jia, G. & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics 24(1), 131–61.
Jia, G. & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50(5), 1280–99.
Johnson, J. & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21, 6099.
Krashen, S. D., Scarcella, R. C. & Long, M. H. (eds) (1982). Child–adult differences in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Lichtman, K. (2013). Developmental comparisons of implicit and explicit language learning. Language Acquisition 20(2), 93108.
Morgan-Short, K. (2007). A neurolinguistic investigation of late-learned second language knowledge: the effects of implicit and explicit conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K. & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: an event-related potential study. Language Learning 60(1), 154–93.
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Muñoz, C. (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Muñoz, C. (2008). Age-related differences in foreign language learning: revisiting the empirical evidence. International Review of Applied Linguistics 46, 197220.
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning 51, 157213.
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rosa, E. & Leow, R. (2004). Awareness, different learning conditions, and L2 development. Applied Psycholinguistics 25, 269–92.
Rosa, E. & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21 511–56.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11 129–58.
Schmidt, R. W. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: of artificial grammars and SLA. In Ellis, N. (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (22) (pp. 165209). London: Academic Press.
Schwartz, B. D. (2004). Why child L2 acquisition? In Van Kampen, J. & Baauw, S. (eds), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2003 (pp. 4766). Utrecht: LOT Occasional Series.
Singleton, D. & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition: the age factor. Buffalo : Multilingual Matters.
Spada, N. & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: a meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2), 263308.
Swisher, L. & Restrepo, M. A. (1995). Effect of implicit and explicit ‘rule’ presentation on bound-morpheme generalization in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 38(1), 168173.
Torras, M. R., Navés, T., Luz Celaya, M. & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2006). Age and interlanguage development in writing. In Muñoz, C. (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 156–82). Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4(2), 105–22.
Unsworth, S. (2005). On the syntax–semantics interface in Dutch: adult and child L2 acquisition compared. International Review of Applied Linguistics 42(4), 173–87.
Zdorenko, T. & Paradis, J. (2011). Articles in child L2 English: when L1 and L2 acquisition meet at the interface. First Language 1, 125.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed