Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: a comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48.
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: a closer look. In Hall, K., Meacham, M., & Shapiro, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley, CA: The Berkeley Linguistics Society Inc.
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S.-W. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331–77.
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N., Essegbey, J., & Kita, S. (2011). The macro-event property: the segmentation of causal chains. In Bohnemeyer, J. & Pederson, E. (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 43–67). Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: cognitive vs. linguistic determinants. In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–76). Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, J. D. (2008). Effect size and eta squared. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12(2), 38–43.
Choi, S. (2011). Language-specificity of motion event expressions in young Korean children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition (LIA), 2(1), 157–84.
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.
Choi, S., & Hattrup, K. (2012). Relative contribution of cognition/perception and language on spatial categorization. Cognitive Science, 36, 102–29.
Cowan, N. (2014). Short-term and working memory in childhood. In Bauer, P. J. & Fivush, R. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the development of children's memory (pp. 202–29). John Wiley Publishers.
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy's typological classification of complex events. In Boas, H. C. (Ed.), Contrastive construction grammar (pp. 201–36). Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Furman, R., Kuntay, A., & Özyürek, A. (2014). Early language-specificity of children's event encoding in speech and gesture: evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 620–34.
Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 410–19.
Gennari, S., Sloman, S., Malt, B., & Fitch, W. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83(1), 49–79.
Gullberg, M. (2011). Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In Bohnemeyer, J. & Pederson, E. (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 166–88). Cambridge University Press.
Harr, A.-K. (2012). The impact of language-specific factors in first language acquisition: the expression of motion in French and German (Studies on Language Acquisition). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hickmann, M. (2003). Children's discourse: person, space and time across languages. Cambridge University Press.
Hickmann, M., Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., Soroli, E., & Vincent, C. (2017). Expressing and categorizing motion in French and English: verbal and non-verbal cognition across languages. In Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (Ed.), Motion and space across languages and applications (pp. 61–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (2006). Static and dynamic location in French and English. First Language, 26(1), 103–35.
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (2010). Typological constraints on the acquisition of spatial language in French and English. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(2), 189–215.
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., & Champaud, C. (2009a). Typological constraints on motion in French and English child language. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Ervin-Tripp, S., Budwig, N., Nakamura, K., & Özçalışkan, Ş. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 209–24). New York: Psychology Press.
Hickmann, M., Taranne, P., & Bonnet, P. (2009b). Motion in first language acquisition: manner and path in French and English child language. Journal of Child Language, 36, 705–41.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K., & Özçalışkan, S. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–14). New York: Psychology Press.
Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. (2011a). The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: some typological issues. Linguistics, 49(5), 1041–76.
Ji, Y., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. (2011b). How children express caused motion events in Chinese and English: universal and language-specific influences. Lingua, 121, 1796–819.
Kopecka, A. (2006). The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: typological perspectives. In Hickmann, M. & Robert, S. (Eds.), Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kopecka, A., & Narasimhan, B. (2012). Events of putting and taking: a crosslinguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam/New York: Benjamins.
Lloyd, P. (1991). Strategies used to communicate route directions by telephone: a comparison of the performance of 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds and adults. Journal of Child Language, 18(1), 175–89.
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., van Staden, M., & Boster, J. S. (2007). The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: a crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2), 133–52.
Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: clarifications and reformulations. In Chiba, S. et al. (Eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita (pp. 403–18). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M., & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 521–49.
Narasimhan, B., & Brown, P. (2009). Getting the INSIDE story: learning to talk about containment in Tzeltal and Hindi. In Mueller-Gathercole, V. (Ed.), Routes to language: studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 97–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Newcombe, N. S., Uttal, D. H., & Sauter, M. (2013). Spatial development. In Zelazo, P. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology, Vol. 1: body and mind (pp. 564–90). Oxford University Press.
Nys, M., Gyselinck, V., & Hickmann, M. (2016). The role of visuo-spatial abilities and working memory in the development of children's spatial representation of a virtual route. Paper presented at the European Workshop on Imagery and Cognition (EWIC), Paris-Descartes, 6–8 June. Retrieved from <http://ewic2016.parisdescartes.fr/>.
Özçalişkan, S. (2015). Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 485–508.
Özçalişkan, S., & Slobin, D. I. (1999). Learning how to search for the frog: expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish and Turkish. In Greenhill, A., Littlefield, H., & Tano, C. (Eds.), BUCLD 23 Proceedings (pp. 541–52). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–84.
Pickering, S. J. (2001). The development of visuo-spatial working memory. Memory, 9(4/6), 423–32.
Richmond, J. L., Zhao, J. L., & Burns, M. A. (2015). What goes where? Eye tracking reveals spatial relational memory during infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 79–91.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.), Language in mind: advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–57). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Slobin, D. I., Bowerman, M., Brown, P., Eisenbeiss, S., & Narasimhan, B. (2011). Putting things in places: developmental consequences of linguistic typology. In Bohnemeyer, J. & Pederson, E. (Eds.), Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 134–65). Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.