Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Children's on-line processing of epistemic modals*

  • VINCENZO MOSCATI (a1), LIKAN ZHAN (a2) and PENG ZHOU (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

In this paper we investigated the real-time processing of epistemic modals in five-year-olds. In a simple reasoning scenario, we monitored children's eye-movements while processing a sentence with modal expressions of different force (might/must). Children were also asked to judge the truth-value of the target sentences at the end of the reasoning task. Consistent with previous findings (Noveck, 2001), we found that children's behavioural responses were much less accurate compared to adults. Their eye-movements, however, revealed that children did not treat the two modal expressions alike. As soon as a modal expression was presented, children and adults showed a similar fixation pattern that varied as a function of the modal expression they heard. It is only at the very end of the sentence that children's fixations diverged from the adult ones. We discuss these findings in relation to the proposal that children narrow down the set of possible outcomes in undetermined reasoning scenarios and endorse only one possibility among several (Acredolo & Horobin, 1987, Ozturk & Papafragou, 2015).

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
[*]

We wish to thank Milena Romano for her help in recruiting and testing our young participants. This study is the result of the joint work of the authors, who equally contributed to the paper. For the sole purpose of the Italian academic system, V. Moscati is directly responsible for the ‘Introduction’ and the ‘Method’ sections. L. Zhan for ‘Results’ and ‘Discussion’ and P. Zhou for the ‘Conclusion’.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AcredoloC. & HorobinK. (1987). Development of relational reasoning and premature closure. Developmental Psychology 23(1), 1321.
BarrD. J. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 457–74.
BascelliE. & BarbieriM. S. (2002). Italian children's understanding of epistemic and deontic modal verbs dovere (must) and potere (may). Journal of Child Language 29, 87107.
BeckS. R. & RobinsonE. J. (2001). Children's ability to make tentative interpretations of ambiguous messages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 79, 95114.
BlissL. S. (1988). Modal usage by pre-school children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 9, 253–61.
ByrnesJ. P. & DuffM. A. (1989). Young children's comprehension of modal expressions. Cognitive Development 4, 369–87.
ChoiY. & TrueswellJ. C. (2010). Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106, 4161.
HirstW. & WeilJ. (1982). Acquisition of epistemic and deontic meaning of modals. Journal of Child Language 9, 659–66.
HornL. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
KuczajS. A. & MaratsosM. P. (1975). What children can say before they will. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 21, 89111.
NoveckI. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78(2), 165–88.
NoveckI. A., HoS. & SeraM. (1996). Children's understanding of epistemic modals. Journal of Child Language 23(3), 621–43.
OzturkO. & PapafragouA. (2015). The acquisition of epistemic modality: from semantic meaning to pragmatic interpretation. Language Learning and Development 11(3), 191214.
PalmerF. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PerkinsM. (1983). Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
PiagetJ. & InhelderB. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
PortnerP. (2009). Modality. New York: Oxford University Press.
RaynerK. & PollatsekA. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Online: <http://www.r-project.org/>.
RobinsonE. J. & WhittakerS. J. (1986). Children's conceptions of meaning–message relationships. Cognition 22, 4160.
ShepherdS. C. (1982). From deontic to epistemic: an analysis of modals in the history of English, creoles, and language acquisition. In Ahlquist A. (ed.), Papers from the fifth international conference on historical linguistics (pp. 316323). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
SnedekerJ. & TrueswellJ. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: the role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology 49, 238–99.
SnedekerJ. & YuanS. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language 58, 574608.
SomervilleS. C., HadkinsonB. A. & GreenbergC. (1979). Two levels of inferential behavior in young children. Child Development 50(1), 119–31.
SophianC. & SomervilleS. C. (1988). Early developments in logical reasoning – considering alternative possibilities. Cognitive Development 3, 183222.
StromswoldK. (1990). Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. Unpublished PhD dissertation, available through MIT's Working Papers in Linguistics.
TaylorM. (1988). Conceptual perspective taking: children's ability to distinguish what they know from what they see. Child Development 59, 703–18.
TanenhausM., Spivey-KnowltonM., EberhardK. & SedivyJ. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632–4.
TrueswellJ. C., SekerinaI., HillN. M. & LogripM. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73, 89134.
WellsG. (1979). Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English. In Lee V. (ed.), Cognitive development: language and thinking from birth to adolescence (pp. 250270). London: Croom Helm.
ZhanL., CrainS. & ZhouP. (2015). The online processing of only if and even if conditional statements: implications for mental models. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27(3), 367–79.
ZhouP., CrainS. & ZhanL. (2012). Sometimes children are as good as adults: the pragmatic use of prosody in children's on-line sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 67, 149–64.
ZhouP., CrainS., & ZhanL. (2014). Grammatical aspect and event recognition in children's online sentence comprehension. Cognition 133, 262–76.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 109 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 284 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.