Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Dense neighborhoods and mechanisms of learning: evidence from children with phonological delay*

  • JUDITH A. GIERUT (a1) and MICHELE L. MORRISETTE (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

There is a noted advantage of dense neighborhoods in language acquisition, but the learning mechanism that drives the effect is not well understood. Two hypotheses – long-term auditory word priming and phonological working memory – have been advanced in the literature as viable accounts. These were evaluated in two treatment studies enrolling twelve children with phonological delay. Study 1 exposed children to dense neighbors versus non-neighbors before training sound production in evaluation of the priming hypothesis. Study 2 exposed children to the same stimuli after training sound production as a test of the phonological working memory hypothesis. Results showed that neighbors led to greater phonological generalization than non-neighbors, but only when presented prior to training production. There was little generalization and no differential effect of exposure to neighbors or non-neighbors after training production. Priming was thus supported as a possible mechanism of learning behind the dense neighborhood advantage in phonological acquisition.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Judith A. Gierut, Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, 200 South Jordan Avenue, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47407, USA. e-mail: gierut@indiana.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DC001694. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We thank Dan Dinnsen for input on the manuscript, Rachel Dale and Maureen Orawiec for assistance with stimulus development, and members of the Learnability Project for help with phonetic transcription, reliability, data entry, and analyses. Paul and Alice Sharp of Sharp Designs & Illustration Inc. supplied the illustrations.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Baddeley , S. Gathercole & C. Papagno (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 105, 158–73.

H. Bird , S. Franklin & D. Howard (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verb and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 33, 73–9.

A. K. Bothe & J. D. Richardson (2011). Statistical, practical, clinical, and personal significance: definitions and applications in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 20, 233–42.

B. A. Church & C. Fisher (1998). Long-term auditory word priming in preschoolers: implicit memory support for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 523–42.

J. Cohen (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

T. L. Demke , S. A. Graham & P. D. Siakaluk (2002). The influence of exposure to phonological neighbours on pre-schoolers’ novel word production. Journal of Child Language 29, 379–92.

K. G. Estes , J. Edwards & J. R. Saffran (2011). Phonotactic constraints on infant word learning. Infancy 16, 180–97.

C. A. Ferguson & C. B. Farwell (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition: English initial consonants in the first fifty words. Language 51, 419–39.

V. M. Garlock , A. C. Walley & J. L. Metsala (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 468–92.

J. A. Gierut & M. L. Morrisette (2014). How to meet the neighbors: modality effects on phonological generalization. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 28, 477–92.

J. A. Gierut , M. L. Morrisette & A. H. Champion (1999). Lexical constraints in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 26, 261–94.

J. A. Gierut & K. M. O'Connor (2002). Precursors to onset clusters in acquisition. Journal of Child Language 29, 495517.

G. Glass (1977). Integrating findings: the meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education 5, 351–79.

J. R. Hoover & H. Storkel (2013). Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: neighbourhood density & third person singular -s. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 27, 661–80.

P. W. Jusczyk , P. A. Luce & J. Charles-Luce (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 630–45.

V. Krull , S. Choi , K. I. Kirk , L. Prusick & B. French (2010). Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing. Ear and Hearing 31, 102–14.

W. M. Merriman & J. M. Marazita (1995). The effect of hearing similar-sounding words on young 2-year-olds’ disambiguation of novel noun reference. Developmental Psychology 31, 973–84.

B. Munson (2001). Phonological pattern frequency and speech production in adults and children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 778–92.

S. Rvachew & M. Nowak (2001). The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 610–23.

C. Savage , E. Lieven , A. Theakston & M. Tomasello (2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: the persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development 2, 2749.

L. D. Shriberg , D. Austin , B. Lewis , J. McSweeny & D. Wilson (1997). The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 708–22.

L. D. Shriberg & J. Kwiatkowski (1982). Phonological disorders II: a conceptual framework for management. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47, 242–56.

L. D. Shriberg & J. Kwiatkowski (1994). Developmental phonological disorders I: a clinical profile. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 1100–26.

L. D. Shriberg , J. Kwiatkowski & F. A. Gruber (1994). Developmental phonological disorders II: short-term speech-sound normalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 1127–50.

A. V. Sosa & C. Stoel-Gammon (2012). Lexical and phonological effects in early word production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 596608.

S. F. Stokes , D. Bleses , H. Basbøll & C. Lambersten (2012). Statistical learning in emerging lexicons: the case of Danish. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 1265–73.

H. L. Storkel (2002). Restructuring of similarity neighborhoods in the developing mental lexicon. Journal of Child Language 29, 251–74.

H. L. Storkel (2004a). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25, 201–21.

H. L. Storkel (2004b). Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 1454–68.

H. L. Storkel (2013). A corpus of consonant-vowel-consonant real words and nonwords: comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods 45, 1159–67.

A. C. Walley (1993). The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review 13, 286350.

P. Beeson & R. Robey (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review 16, 161169.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 181 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.