Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T10:00:01.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of syntactic subjects in Portuguese-speaking children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Virginia Valian  and
Zena Eisenberg
Virginia Valian*
Affiliation:
Hunter College
Zena Eisenberg
Affiliation:
Hunter College
*
Department of Psychology, Hunter College, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to separate competence and performance factors in acquisition of knowledge of syntactic subjects, we audiotaped and analysed the spontaneous speech of 20 Portuguese-speaking two-year-olds in natural conversation with Portuguese-speaking adults. We separated the children into three groups based on Mean Length of Utterance in Words: 1·5–1·99; 2·0–2·99; 3·0–4·99. Our cross-sectional data demonstrated that Portuguese-speaking children increased their use of subjects from 28% in the lowest-MLUW group to 57% in the highest-MLUW group. The children in the highest-MLUW group almost perfectly matched the adult speakers in the study on every measure. The increase in children's use of subjects was primarily due to an increase in the use of pronominal subjects. A comparison between Portuguese- and English-speaking children suggests that adult competence about the status of subjects is present at the onset of combinatorial speech, as shown by differential production of subjects. Each group also experiences performance limitations, as shown by the increase in subject use as development proceeds.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 103 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-24369), and in Part by a grant from The City University of New York PSC-CUNY Research Award Program. We thank Stephanie Aubry and Heliana Mello for discussion of earlier drafts, James Hoeffner for comments on memory development, and two anonymous readers for their helpful reviews. We thank the children, parents and day care centres whose participation made this study possible.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 491–504.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (1993). Grammatical continuity in language development: the case of subjectless sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 721–34.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, R., Kurland, M. & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short- term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 33, 386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In Siegler, R. S. (ed.), Children's thinking: what develops? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.Google Scholar
Duarte, M. E. L. (1993). Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: a trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil. In Roberts, I. & Kato, M. A. (eds), Português Brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica. Campinas, S.P.: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Galves, C. (1987). A sintaxe do português brasileiro. Ensaios de Estudos Lingüísticos 13, 13–50.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1991). The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30, 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1994). Young children's representation of prosodic phonology: evidence from English-speakers' weak syllable productions. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilfoyle, E. & Noonan, M. (1992). Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de Linguistigue 37, 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. & Wexler, K. (1993). On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 421–59.Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-J. (in press). The acquisition of Korean. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
La Berge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (1994). Setting the null argument parameters: evidence from American Sign Language and other languages. In Lust, B., Hermon, G. & Kornfilt, J. (eds), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: Binding, dependencies, and learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lira, S. d. A. (1982). Nominal, pronominal and zero subject in Brazilian Portuguese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Mazuka, R., Lust, B., Wakayama, T. & Snyder, W. (1986). Distinguishing effects of parameters in early syntax acquisition: a cross-linguistic study of Japanese and English. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 25. Stanford.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. K. & Leonard, L. B. (1994). Subject pronoun and article omissions in the speech of children with specific language impairment: a phonological interpretation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 171–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuñez del Prado, Z., Foley, C., Proman, R. & Lust, B. (1993). Subordinate CP and pro-drop: evidence for degree-n learnability from an experimental study of Spanish and English. Paper presented at NELS, University of Massachusetts: Amherst.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Lust, B., Hermon, G. & Kornfilt, J. (eds), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: crosslinguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: Binding, dependencies, and learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Rohrbacher, B. (1995). Null subjects in early child English and the theory of economy of projection. In R. Izvorski & V. Tredinnick (eds), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 83–119.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarallo, F. (1993). Sobre a alegada origem crioula do português brasileiro: mudanças sintáticas aleatórias. In Roberts, I. & Kato, M. A. (eds), Portugues Brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica. Campinas, S.P.: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Teixeira, R. F. (1986). Zero anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese subjects and objects: morphological and typological considerations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1990 a). Null subjects: a problem for parameter setting models of language acquisition. Cognition 35, 105–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valian, V. (1990 b). Logical and psychological constraints on the acquisition of syntax. In Frazier, L. & de Villiers, J. (eds), Language processing and language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40, 21–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valian, V. (1992). Categories of first syntax: be, be + ing, and nothingness. in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement:functional categories and V2 phenomena in language development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1993). Parser failure and grammar change. Cognition 46, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. (1994). Children's postulation of null subjects: parameter setting and language acquisition. In Lust, B., Hermon, G. & Kornfilt, J. (eds), Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: crosslinguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: Binding, dependencies, and learnability. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Valian, V., Hoeffner, J. & Aubry, S. (in press). Young children's imitation of sentence subjects: evidence of processing limitations. Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C. T. & Levitt, A. (1992). Null subject vs. null object: some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2, 221–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, D. (1992). A' antecedents and empty subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. In Macedo, D. P. & Koike, D. A. (eds), Romance linguistics: the Portuguese context. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar