Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Development of the first-mention bias*

  • JOSHUA K. HARTSHORNE (a1), REBECCA NAPPA (a1) and JESSE SNEDEKER (a1)
Abstract

In many contexts, pronouns are interpreted as referring to the character mentioned first in the previous sentence, an effect called the ‘first-mention bias’. While adults can rapidly use the first-mention bias to guide pronoun interpretation, it is unclear when this bias emerges during development. Curiously, experiments with children between two and three years old show successful use of order of mention, while experiments with older children (four to five years old) do not. While this could suggest U-shaped development, it could also reflect differences in the methodologies employed. We show that children can indeed use first-mention information, but do so too slowly to have been detected in previous work reporting null results. Comparison across the present and previously published studies suggests that the speed at which children deploy first-mention information increases greatly during the preschool years.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Joshua Hartshorne, 77 Massachusetts Ave., 46-4053H, Cambridge, MA 02139. tel: 617 324 2894; e-mail: jkhartshorne@gmail.com
Footnotes
Hide All
[*]

This work was presented at BUCLD 35 and benefited from comments there. JKH's participation in this project was supported by the Department of Defense (DoD) through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) Program. RN's participation was funded by a grant from the Ellison Medical Foundation (‘Cognitive Neuroscience of Autism and Dyslexia’ to N. Kanwisher & J. Gabrieli, subcontract to JS). Participant recruitment and expenses were funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (0921012 to JS).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Arnold, J. E. (1998). Reference form and discourse patterns. (Unpublished dissertation), Stanford University.
Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S. & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language & Cognitive Processes 22, 527–65.
Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S. & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition 76, B1326.
Bakker, M., van Dijk, A. & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7, 543–54.
Bates, D. M. & Sarkar, D. (2007). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (Version R package version 0.9975-12).
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, John R. & Brown, Roger (ed.), Cognition and the development of language, 279362. New York: Wiley.
Cazden, C. B. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. Child Development 39, 433–48.
Choe, J. (2012). Acquisition of raising: intervention effects in A-movement. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meetings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS).
Corbett, A. T. & Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: accessing potential antecedents. Memory & Cognition 11, 283–94.
Crawley, R. A. & Stevenson, R. J. (1990). Reference in single sentences and in texts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19, 191210.
Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J. & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19, 245–64.
Crinean, M. & Garnham, A. (2006). Implicit causality, implicit consequentiality, and semantic roles. Language and Cognitive Processes 21, 636–48.
Ervin, S. M. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In Lenneberg, E. H. (ed.), New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fagan, J. F. (1971). Infants’ recognition memory for a series of visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 11, 244–50.
Fantz, R. L. (1958). Pattern vision in young infants. Psychological Record 8, 43–7.
Fernald, A., Perfors, A. & Marchman, V. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology 42, 98116.
Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingly, D., Weinberg, A. & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science 9, 228–31.
Fernald, A., Thorpe, K. & Marchman, V. A. (2010). Blue car, red car: developing efficiency in online interpretation of adjective-noun phrases. Cognitive Psychology 60, 190217.
Garvey, C. & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 459–64.
Gordon, P. C. & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 216–31.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J. & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 17, 311–47.
Gordon, P. C. & Scearce, K. A. (1995). Pronominaliation and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Memory & Cognition 23, 313–23.
Hartshorne, J. K. & Schachner, A. (2012). Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 6(8).
Hartshorne, J. K. & Snedeker, J. (2013). Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: the advantages of finer-grained semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(10), 14741508.
Hirsch, C. & Wexler, K. (2007). The late acquisition of raising: what children seem to think about seem. In Dubinsky, S. & Davies, B. (eds), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising, 3570. New York: Springer.
Jaeger, F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Langauge 59, 434–46.
Järvikivi, J., van Gompel, R., Hyona, J. & Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject preference accounts. Psychological Science 16, 260–4.
Kaiser, E. & Trueswell, J. C. (2008). Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 23, 709–48.
Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H. & Elman, J. L. (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics 25, 144.
Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maratsos, M. P. (1974). Children who get worse at understanding the passive: a replication of Bever. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3, 6574.
Marcus, G., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, J. T. & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57.
Pyykkönen, P. & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. Experimental Psychology 57(1), 516.
Pyykkönen, P., Matthews, D. & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: a visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 115–29.
R-development-core-team (2005). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Satistical Computing, online: <http://www.R-project.org>.
Smyth, R. (1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholiguistic Research 23, 197229.
Song, H.-J. & Fisher, C. (2005). Who's “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 52, 2957.
Song, H.-J. & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2·5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. Lingua 117, 1959–87.
Spelke, E. S. (1985). Preferential-looking methods as tools for the study of cognition in infancy. In Krasnegor, N. A. (ed.), Measurement of audition and vision in the first year of postnatal life: a methodological overview,, 323–63. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A. & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9, 519–48.
Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J. & Sanford, A. J. (1998). Implicit consequentiality. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1031–6. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M. & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integreation of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632–4.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. & Hue, C. W. (2003). Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition 86, 283315.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed