Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Does size matter? Subsegmental cues to vowel mispronunciation detection*

  • NIVEDITA MANI (a1) and KIM PLUNKETT (a2)

Abstract

Children look longer at a familiar object when presented with either correct pronunciations or small mispronunciations of consonants in the object's label, but not following larger mispronunciations. The current article examines whether children display a similar graded sensitivity to different degrees of mispronunciations of the vowels in familiar words, by testing children's sensitivity to 1-feature, 2-feature and 3-feature mispronunciations of the vowels of familiar labels: Children aged 1 ; 6 did not show a graded sensitivity to vowel mispronunciations, even when the trial length was increased to allow them more time to form a response. Two-year-olds displayed a robust sensitivity to increases in vowel mispronunciation size, differentiating between small and large mispronunciations. While this suggests that early lexical representations contain information about the features contributing to vocalic identity, we present evidence that this graded sensitivity is better explained by the acoustic characteristics of the different mispronunciation types presented to children.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Nivedita Mani, Free-Floater (Junior) Research Group, ‘Language Acquisition’, University of Göttingen, Gosslerstrasse, 14, 37073 Göttingen. e-mail: nmani@gwdg.de

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

This research was supported by an ESRC grant RES-000-23-1322 awarded to Kim Plunkett.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bailey, T. & Plunkett, K. (2002). Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development 17, 1265–82.
Ballem, K. & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in 14-month-olds. Journal of Child Language 32, 159–73.
Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R. & Micell, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 403, 428–30.
Connine, C. M., Titone, D., Deelman, T. & Blasko, D. (1997). Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 463–80.
Curtin, S., Fennell, C. & Escudero, P. (2009). Weighting of acoustic cues explains patterns of word-object associative learning. Developmental Science 12, 725–31.
Gerken, L., Murphy, W. D. & Aslin, R. N. (1995). 3-year olds' and 4-year-olds' perceptual confusions for spoken words. Perception and Psychophysics 57, 475–86.
Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition 87, B23B34.
Hamilton, A., Plunkett, K. & Schafer, G. (2000). Infant vocabulary development assessed with a British communicative development inventory. Journal of Child Language 27, 689705.
Havy, M. & Nazzi, T. (2009). Better processing of consonantal over vocalic information in word learning at 16 months of age. Infancy 14(4), 439–56.
Kuhl, P., Williams, K., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255(5044), 606608.
Liberman, A., Delattre, P., Cooper, F. & Gerstman, L. (1954). The role of consonant–vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. Psychological Monographs 68, 113.
Mani, N., Coleman, J. & Plunkett, K. (2008). Phonological specificity of vocalic features at 18-months. Language and Speech 51, 3–21.
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2007). Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 57(2), 252–72.
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2008a). Vowels and consonants, difference or no difference. Paper presented to the International Conference on Infant Studies, Vancouver, Canada.
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2008b). 14-month-olds pay attention to vowels in novel words. Developmental Science 11(1), 5359.
Mather, E. & Plunkett, K. (2009). Learning words over time: The role of stimulus repetition in mutual exclusivity. Infancy 14(1), 6076.
Miller, G. A. & Nicely, P. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27(2), 338–52.
Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words, differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition 98(1), 1330.
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., Moquet, B. & Butler, J. (2009). Bias for consonantal over vocalic information in French- and English-learning 30-month-olds: Crosslinguistic evidence in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102, 522–37.
Nespor, M., Pena, M. & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different role of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2, 203229.
Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics 13(2), 253–60.
Stager, C. L. & Werker, J. F. (1997). Children listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than word learning tasks. Nature 388, 381–82.
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 76, 147–66.
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighbourhoods and the word form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science 13(5), 480–84.
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2007). Lexical competition in young children's word learning. Cognitive Psychology 54, 99–132.
Werker, J. F. & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR, A Developmental Framework of Infant Speech Processing. Language Learning and Development 1(2), 197234.
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M. & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy 3(1), 130.
Werker, J. & Tees, R. (1984). Cross-language speech perception, Evidence for perceptual reorganisation during the first year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development 7, 4963.
White, K. S. & Morgan, J. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 114–32.

Does size matter? Subsegmental cues to vowel mispronunciation detection*

  • NIVEDITA MANI (a1) and KIM PLUNKETT (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed