Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: A comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model*

  • DANIEL FREUDENTHAL (a1), JULIAN PINE (a1) and FERNAND GOBET (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

In this study, we use corpus analysis and computational modelling techniques to compare two recent accounts of the OI stage: Legate & Yang's (2007) Variational Learning Model and Freudenthal, Pine & Gobet's (2006) Model of Syntax Acquisition in Children. We first assess the extent to which each of these accounts can explain the level of OI errors across five different languages (English, Dutch, German, French and Spanish). We then differentiate between the two accounts by testing their predictions about the relation between children's OI errors and the distribution of infinitival verb forms in the input language. We conclude that, although both accounts fit the cross-linguistic patterning of OI errors reasonably well, only MOSAIC is able to explain why verbs that occur more frequently as infinitives than as finite verb forms in the input also occur more frequently as OI errors than as correct finite verb forms in the children's output.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence:Daniel Freudenthal, School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Bedford Street South Liverpool, L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. tel: 0151 794 1108; e-mail: D.Freudenthal@liverpool.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

We would like to thank the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig for allowing us access to the Leo Corpus. This research was funded by the ESRC under Grant Number RES-062-23-1348.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

N. Hyams (1996). The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives in language acquisition, 91–128. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

A. Pierce (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

C. Pye , B. Pfeiler , L. De León , P. Brown & P. Mateo (2007). Roots or edges? Explaining variation in children's early verb forms across five Mayan languages. In B. Pfeiler (ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica, 1546. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

K. Wexler (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation in child grammar. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (eds), Verb movement, 305365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 136 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.