Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:28:16.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explicating the Conceptual Basis of Language*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

David McNeill
David McNeill
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 521 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Preparation of this Note was supported by grants to the University of Chicago from the Spencer Foundation and the Sloan Foundation. I am indebted, as always, to Nobuko B. McNeill for commenting on the paper. Address for correspondence: Center for Cognitive Science, University of Chicago, Beecher Hall, 5848 South University Ave., Chicago, 111. 60637, U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. (1980). Review of the conceptual basis of language. American Scientist 68. 702.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. and Miller, G. A. (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Foster, S. (1981). Review of the conceptual basis of language. JChLang 8. 660–3.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1978). Structural parallels between language and action in development. In Lock, A. J. (ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: the emergence of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozhevnikov, V. A. & Chistovich, L. A. (1965). Speech: articulation and perception. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, Joint Publication Research Service (30,543).Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1975). Semiotic extension. In Solso, R. L. (ed.), Information processing and cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1979). The conceptual basis of language. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). The collected works of Charles Sanders Peirce (Harshorne, C. & Weiss, P., eds.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library. (First published in 1915.)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. (Trans, by Pears, D. F. and Mc-Guinness, B. F..) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar