Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Functions of Turkish evidentials in early child–caregiver interactions: a growth curve analysis of longitudinal data

  • Berna A. UZUNDAG (a1), Süleyman S. TAŞÇI (a1), Aylin C. KÜNTAY (a1) and Ayhan AKSU-KOÇ (a2)
Abstract

In languages with evidential marking, utterances consist of an informational content and a specification of the mode of access to that information. In this first longitudinal study investigating the acquisition of the Turkish evidential marker −mIş in naturalistic child–caregiver interactions, we examined six children between 8 and 36 months of age. We charted individual differences in child and caregiver speech over time by conducting growth curve analyses. Children followed a similar course of acquisition in terms of the proportion of the marker in overall speech. However, children exhibited differences with respect to the order of emergence of different evidential functions (e.g., inference, hearsay), where each child showed a unique pattern irrespective of the frequency in caregiver input. Nonfactual use of the marker was very frequent in child and caregiver speech, where high-SES caregivers mostly produced the marker during story-telling and pretend play, and low-SES caregivers for regulating the child's behavior.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: buzundag13@ku.edu.tr
References
Hide All
Aikhenvald, Y. A. (2004). Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aksu-Koç, A. (1988/2006). The acquisition of aspect and modality: the case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge University Press.
Aksu-Koç, A. (2016). The interface of evidentials and epistemics in Turkish: perspectives from acquisition. In Güven, M., Akar, D., Öztürk, B., & Kelepir, M. (Eds.), Exploring the Turkish linguistic landscape: essays in honor of Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan (Studies in Language Companion Series 175) (pp. 143–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aksu-Koç, A., & Slobin, D. (1986). A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe, W. & Nichols, J. (Eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 159–67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Retrieved from <http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4>.
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Choi, S. (1991). Early acquisition of epistemic meanings in Korean: a study of sentence-ending suffixes in the spontaneous speech of three children. First Language, 11, 93119.
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1 (pp. 373524). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Courtney, E. (2008). Child production of Quechua evidential morphemes in conversations and story retellings. Unpublished ms, University of Texas at El Paso. Retrieved from <http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=ellenhcourtney>.
de Haan, F. (2001). The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics, 67, 193219.
DeLancey, S. (2001). The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 369–82.
Göksel, A., & Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
Hocking, T. D. (2014). directlabels: direct labels for multicolor plots in lattice or ggplot2. R package version 2014.1.31/r678. Retrieved from <http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/directlabels/>.
Johanson, L. (2003). Evidentiality in Turkic. In Aikhenvald, A. & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp. 273–90). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 328.
Küntay, A. C., Koçbaş, D., & Taşçı, S. S. (2015). Koç University Longitudinal Language Development Database as a part of the ‘ACQDIV Corpus’. retrieved from <http://www.acqdiv.uzh.ch/en/resources.html>.
Lee, H. T., & Law, A. (2000). Evidential final particles in child Cantonese. In Clark, E. V. (Ed.), The proceedings of the 30th annual Child Language Conference (pp. 131–8). Stanford, CA: Center for the study of Language and Information.
Matsui, T. (2014). Children's understanding of linguistic expressions of certainty and evidentiality. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 295316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matsui, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2013). Developing sensitivity to the sources of information: early use of the Japanese quotative particles tte and to in mother–child conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 525.
Ögel, H. (2007). Developments in source monitoring and linguistic encoding of source. Unpublished master's thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozturk, O., & Papafragou, A. (2016). The acquisition of evidentiality and source monitoring. Language Learning and Development, 12, 199230.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team (2017). nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-118. Retrieved from <http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme>.
Plungian, V. A. (2001). The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 349–57.
Sarkar, D. (2008). Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R. New York: Springer.
Scheipl, F., Greven, S., & Kuechenhoff, H. (2008). Size and power of tests for a zero random effect variance or polynomial regression in additive and linear mixed models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(7), 3283–99.
Shirai, J., Shirai, H., & Furuta, Y. (2000). Acquisition of sentence-final particles in Japanese. In Perkins, M. & Howard, S. (Eds.), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 243–50). London: Plenum.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
Slobin, D., & Aksu, A. (1982). Tense, aspect, modality, and more in Turkish evidentials. In Hopper, P. (Ed.), Tense–aspect: between semantics and pragmatics (pp. 185200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Production–comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 179–99.
Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Willett, T. L. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12, 5197.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Uzundag et al. supplementary material
Uzundag et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (188 KB)
188 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 58 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 208 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st February 2018 - 15th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.