Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Growth in syntactic complexity between four years and adulthood: evidence from a narrative task

  • Pauline FRIZELLE (a1) (a2), Paul A. THOMPSON (a1), David MCDONALD (a1) (a3) and Dorothy V. M. BISHOP (a1)
Abstract

Studies examining productive syntax have used varying elicitation methods and have tended to focus on either young children or adolescents/adults, so we lack an account of syntactic development throughout middle childhood. We describe here the results of an analysis of clause complexity in narratives produced by 354 speakers aged from four years to adulthood using the Expressive, Receptive, and Recall of Narrative Instrument (ERRNI). We show that the number of clauses per utterance increased steadily through this age range. However, the distribution of clause types depended on which of two stories was narrated, even though both stories were designed to have a similar story structure. In addition, clausal complexity was remarkably similar regardless of whether the speaker described a narrative from pictures, or whether the same narrative was recalled from memory. Finally, our findings with the youngest children showed that the task of generating a narrative from pictures may underestimate syntactic competence in those aged below five years.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: E-mail: p.frizelle@ucc.ie
References
Hide All
Berman, R. A. (1996). Form and function in developing narrative abilities: the case of ‘and’. In Slobin, D. I., Gerhardt, J., Kyratzis, A., & Guo, J. (Eds.), Social interaction, context, and language: essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 243–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2009). Clause packaging in narratives: a crosslinguistic developmental study. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K., & Ozcaliskan, S. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 149–62). New York: Psychology Press.
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994a). Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994b). Filtering and packaging in narrative. In Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 515–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5(1), 143.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The Test for Reception of Grammar – TROG 2. London: Pearson.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2004). Expression, Reception and Recall of Narrative Instrument. London: Pearson.
Bishop, D., & Donlan, C. (2005). The role of syntax in encoding and recall of pictorial narrative: evidence for specific language impairment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 2548.
Blake, J., Quartaro, G., & Onorati, S. (1993). Evaluating quantitative measures of grammatical complexity in spontaneous speech samples. Journal of Child Language, 20, 139–52.
Blything, L. P., Davies, R., & Cain, K. (2015). Young children's comprehension of temporal relations in complex sentences: the influence of memory on performance. Child Development, 86(6), 1922–34.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burton Roberts, N. (1986). Analysing sentences: an introduction to English syntax. Harlow: Longman.
Byrnes, J. P. (2008) Cognitive development during adolescence. In Adams, G. R. & Berzonsky, M. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (Wiley Blackwell Handbooks of Developmental Psychology) (pp. 227–46). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Chafe, W. (1984). How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10, 437–49.
Clark, E. V. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 266–75.
Coelho, C. A. (2002). Story narrative of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 45(6), 1232–48.
Crain, S., & Pietroski, P. (2001). Nature, nurture and universal grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24(2), 139–86.
Diessel, H. (2001). The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: a typological study. Language, 77, 343–65.
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, H. (2005). Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics, 43, 449–70.
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar in interaction: adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge University Press.
French, L. A., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Comprehension of before and after in logical and arbitrary sequences. Journal of Child Language, 4, 247–56.
Givón, T. (1990) Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity: diachrony, ontogeny, neuro-cognition, evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F., & Hofstetter, R. (1994). Syntactic complexity in Spanish narratives: a developmental study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 645–54.
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press.
Hesketh, A. (2004). Grammatical performance of children with language disorder on structured elicitation and narrative tasks. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 18(3), 161–82.
Huddleston, R., Pullum, G. K., & Bauer, L. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels: NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, IL: NCTE.
Klecan-Aker, J. S., & Hedrick, D. L. (1985). A study of the syntactic language skills of normal school-age children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 16(3), 187–98.
Klee, T., & Fitzgerald, M. D. (1985). The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 12(2), 251–69.
Klee, T., Schaffer, M., May, S., Membrino, I., & Mougey, K. (1989). A comparison of the age-MLU relation in normal and specifically language-impaired preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 226–33.
Leadholm, B. J., & Miller, J. F. (1992). Language sample analysis: the Wisconsin guide. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Liles, B. Z., Coelho, C. A., & Zalagens, M. R. (1989). Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. Journal Speech Hearing Disorders, 54(3), 356–66.
Loban, W. (1976). Language development: kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
McNeill, D. (1966). The creation of language by children. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (Eds.), Psycholinguistics papers (pp. 99115). Edinburgh University Press.
Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(2), 154–61.
Nippold, M. A. (2009). School-age children talk about chess: Does knowledge drive syntactic complexity? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 856–71.
Nippold, M. A., Cramond, P. M., & Hayward-Mayhew, C. (2013). Spoken language production in adults: examining age-related differences in syntactic complexity. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(3), 195207.
Nippold, M. A., Hesketh, L. J., Duthie, J. K., & Mansfield, T. C. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: a study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1048–64.
Nippold, M. A., Frantz-Kaspar, M. W., Cramond, P. M., Kirk, C., Hayward-Mayhew, C., & MacKinnon, M. (2014). Conversational and narrative speaking in adolescents: examining the use of complex syntax. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 57, 876–86.
Nippold, M. A., Frantz-Kaspar, M. W., Cramond, P. M., Kirk, C., Hayward-Mayhew, C., & MacKinnon, M. (2015). Critical thinking about fables: examining language production and comprehension in adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(2), 325–35.
Nippold, M. A., Mansfield, T. C., & Billow, J. L. (2007). Peer conflict explanations in children, adolescents, and adults: examining the development of complex syntax. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 179–88.
Phillips, N. (2016). A companion to the e-book ‘YaRrr!: the pirate's guide to R’. R package version 0.1.2. Retrieved from: <https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=yarrr>.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from: <http://www.R-project.org/>.
Renfrew, C. (1991). The Bus Story, 2nd ed. Oxford: Speechmark Publishing Ltd.
Rondal, J. A., Ghiotto, M., Bredart, S., & Bachelet, J. F. (1987). Age-relation, reliability and grammatical validity of measures of utterance length. Journal of Child Language, 14, 433–46.
Schneider, P., Dubé, R. V., & Hayward, D. (2005). The Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument. University of Alberta Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Retrieved from<www.rehabresearch.ualberta.ca/enni>.
Scott, C. M. (1988). Producing complex sentences. Topics in Language Disorders, 8(2), 4462.
Scott, C. M., & Balthazar, C. H. (2010). The grammar of information: challenges for older students with language impairments. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 288307.
Scott, C. M., & Stokes, S. L. (1995). Measures of syntax in school-age children and adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26(4), 309–19.
Southwood, F., & Russell, A. F. (2004). Comparison of conversation, freeplay, and story generation as methods of language sample elicitation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(2), 366–76.
Thordardottir, E. T., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2002). Verb argument structure weakness in specific language impairment in relation to age and utterance length. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16(4), 233–50.
Trosborg, A. (1982). Children's comprehension of ‘before’ and ‘after’ reinvestigated. Journal of Child Language, 9, 381402.
Tyack, D., & Gottsleben, R. (1986). Acquisition of complex sentences. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 7, 160–74.
Verhoeven, L., Aparici, M., Cahana-Amitay, D., van Hell, J., Kriz, S., & Viguie-Simon, A. (2002). Clause packaging in writing and speech: a cross-linguistic developmental analysis. Written Language and Literacy, 5(2), 135–62.
Wagner, C. R., Nettelbladt, U., Sahlén, B., & Nilholm, C. (2000). Conversation versus narration in pre-school children with language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35(1), 8393.
Westerveld, M. F., Gillon, G. T., & Miller, J. F. (2004). Spoken language samples of New Zealand children in conversation and narration. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 6(4), 195208.
Westerveld, M. F., & Vidler, K. (2016). Spoken language samples of Australian children in conversation, narration and exposition. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 288–98.
Wong, A. M. Y., Au, C. W. S., & Stokes, S. F. (2004). Three measures of language production for Cantonese-speaking school-age children in a story-retelling task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5), 1164–78.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Frizelle et al. supplementary material
Frizelle et al. supplementary material 2

 Word (112 KB)
112 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Frizelle et al. supplementary material
Frizelle et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (86 KB)
86 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 102 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 889 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th June 2018 - 18th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.