Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-5vn5w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T15:24:17.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interface Delay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2021

John GRINSTEAD
John GRINSTEAD*
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, USA
*
*Corresponding author: John Grinstead, Department of Spanish & Portuguese, The Ohio State University, 298 Hagerty Hall, 1775 College Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210. E-mail: grinstead.11@osu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interface Delay is a theory of syntactic development, which attempts to explain an array of constructions that are slow to develop, which are characterized by being sensitive to discourse-pragmatic considerations of the type associated with the natural semantic class of definites. The theory claims that neither syntax itself, nor the discourse-pragmatic abilities related to executive function and theory of mind themselves are slow to develop. Rather, the claim is that the nexus or interface between the two cognitive domains is slow to develop. We review the development of subjects in child Spanish as an example of this delayed growth trajectory. Further, we review evidence that a delay in the development of tense causes concomitant delays in the seemingly unrelated phenomena of non-nominative case subject pronoun use and un-inverted wh- questions.

Keywords

interface delaymorphosyntaxspanishmodularitychild language

Information

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 48 , Special Issue 5: Special issue on Testable Theories of Core First Language Acquisition , September 2021 , pp. 888 - 906
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Avrutin, S. (1994). Psycholinguistic Investigations in the Theory of Reference. (PhD Doctoral Dissertation), MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, M. (2011). Time and Modality Without Tense or Modals. In Musan, R. & Rathert, M. (eds.), Tense Across Languages (pp. 147–188). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummerow, C. (2009). Developing Spanish Child Language—The Syntax of Pronominal Case. (Undergraduate Honors Thesis), The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Deen, K. U., & Hyams, N. (2006). The morphosyntax of mood in early grammar with special reference to Swahili. First Language, 26(1), 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H., & Edmondson, J. (1983). The Verbal Complex in Continental West Germanic. In Abraham, W. (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Papers from the ‘3rd Groningen Grammar Talks’ (pp. 155–216). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Donnellan, M. (2010). Case-Finiteness Contingencies in Child Language. (BA Undergraduate Honors Thesis), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S., Bartke, S., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Structural and Lexical Case in Child German: Evidence From Language-Impaired and Typically Developing Children. Language Acquisition, 13(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassi-Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, H. (2018). Discourse and Grammatical Cues in the Acquisition of Spanish Pronouns. (Doctoral Dissertation), Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J., & Gobet, F. (2006). Modeling the Development of Children's Use of Optional Infinitives in Dutch and English Using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(2), 277–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J., & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: A comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 643–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodall, G. (1991). SPEC of IP and SPEC of CP in Spanish wh-questions. In Ashby, W. J., Mithun, M., Perissinotto, G., & Raposo, E. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the XXI Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (pp. 199–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grinstead, J. (1998). Subjects, Sentential Negation and Imperatives in Child Spanish and Catalan. (Doctoral Dissertation), UCLA.Google Scholar
Grinstead, J. (2004). Subjects and Interface Delay in Child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80(1), 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J. (2016). The Development of Clause Structure. In Lidz, J., Snyder, W., & Pater, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics (pp. 341–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grinstead, J., Donnellan, M., Barajas, J., & Johnson, M. (2014). Pronominal Case and Verbal Finiteness Contingencies in Child English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J., Reig-Alamillo, A., Hernández, E., & Culicover, P. (2007). Subject-Verb Inversion in Child Spanish Wh- Questions. Paper presented at the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Grinstead, J., & Spinner, P. (2009). The Clausal Left Periphery in Child Spanish and German. Probus, 21(1), 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Goodall, G. (2018). Inversion and Finiteness in Spanish and English: Developmental Evidence From the Optional Infinitive and Optional Inversion Stages. Language, 94(3), 575–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J., Warren, V., Ricci, C., & Sanderson, S. (2009). Finiteness and Subject-Auxiliary Inversion in Child English. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. S. (1967). Topicalization in Child Language. Foundations of Language, 3, 37–65.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (1996). Acquisition of Italian interrogatives. In Clahsen, H. (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and crosslinguistic comparisons (pp. 241–269). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D., & Tyack, D. L. (1979). Inversion of subject NP and Aux in children's questions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(4), 333–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture Of The Language Faculty. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute Technology Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, E. (1984). Empty Categories, Case and Configurationality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 2, 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, D. F., & Leonard, L. B. (1988). Specific Language Impairment and Parameter Theory. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2(4), 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L., & Carreiras, M. (2011a). When persons disagree: An ERP study of unagreement in Spanish. Psychophysiology, 48(10), 1361–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L., & Carreiras, M. (2011b). A person is not a number: Discourse involvement in subject–verb agreement computation. Brain Research, 1410, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. (1974). Preschool children's use of definite and indefinite articles. Child Development, 45, 446–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onishi, K., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages. (Dissertation), City University of New York, New York.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F., & Olarrea, A. (2006). Microvariation in Caribbean/non-Caribbean Spanish Interrogatives. Probus, 18(1), 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C. (2012). Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialectal Leveling and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Lieven, E. V. M., & Theakston, A. L. (2005). Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: Why the Data on Children's Use of Non-Nominative 3psg Subjects Count against the ATOM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, C. (2009). Developmental Connections Between Verb Inflection and Subject-Verb Inversion in Pre-school Children with Specific Language Impairment. (B.S. Honors Thesis), The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Rispoli, M. (1994). Pronoun case overextensions and paradigm building. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispoli, M. (1999). Case and agreement in English language development. Journal of Child Language, 26(2), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rispoli, M. (2005). When Children Reach beyond Their Grasp: Why Some Children Make Pronoun Case Errors and Others Don't. Journal of Child Language, 32(1), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 501–557.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1992). Residual verb-second and the wh- criterion Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics. Geneva: Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax (pp. pp 281–337). Dordrecht: Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, A., & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1980). Specifying Reference to the Subject: French Causatives and Conditions on Representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(1), 97–202.Google Scholar
Santelmann, L., Berk, S., Austin, J., Someshankar, S., Lambert, K., & Lust, B. (2002). Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions. Journal of Child Language, 29(4), 813–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schütze, C. T., & Wexler, K. (1996). Subject Case Licensing and English Root Infinitives. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 20(2), 670–681.Google Scholar
Shin, N. (2016). Acquiring constraints on morphosyntactic variation: children's Spanish subject pronoun expression. Journal of Child Language, 43, 914–947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, N. L., & Cairns, H. (2012). The development of NP selection in school-age children: reference and Spanish subject pronouns. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 19(1), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. L., & Erker, D. (2015). The emergence of structured variability in morphosyntax: Childhood acquisition of Spanish subject pronouns. In Carvalho, A. M. a., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. (eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective (pp. 169–189). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, W., & Stromswold, K. (1997). The Structure and Acquisition of English Dative Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(2), 281–317.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1984). On Inversion In Spanish and Some of Its Effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(1), 103–129.Google Scholar
Vega-Mendoza, M. (2010). Subject-verb inversion in wh- questions in Spanish. (MA Master's Thesis), The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J., & Snyder, W. (2009). On the Acquisition of Overt Subjects, Topics and Wh-Questions in Spanish. In Castro, A., Costa, J., Lobo, M., & Pratas, F. (eds.), Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Warren, V. (2007). Children's Grammaticality Judgments of Nonfinite Verbs & Uninverted Wh-Questions. (B.A. Undergraduate Thesis), The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A New Explanation of the Optional Infinitive Stage. Lingua, 106(1–4), 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, J. A., Gerson, S., Henderson, A. M. E., & Buresh, J. (2009). The emergence of intention attribution in infancy The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol 51). (Vol. 51, pp. 187–222). San Diego, CA US: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar