Skip to main content Accessibility help

Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings*



Previous research has found that children who are acquiring argument-drop languages such as Turkish and Chinese make use of syntactic frames to extend familiar verb meanings (Göksun, Küntay & Naigles, 2008; Lee & Naigles, 2008). This article investigates whether two-year-olds learning Japanese, another argument-drop language, make use of argument number and case markings in learning novel verbs. Children watched videos of novel causative and non-causative actions via Intermodal Preferential Looking. The novel verbs were presented in transitive or intransitive frames; the NPs in the transitive frames appeared ‘bare’ or with case markers. Consistent with previous findings of Morphosyntactic Bootstrapping, children who heard the novel verbs in the transitive frame with case markers reliably assigned those verbs to the novel causative actions.


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: e-mail:


Hide All

We would like to thank all the nurseries and children who participated in the study. We benefited from useful discussions with Kerstin Abbot-Smith and Aylin Küntay. This study was funded by Economic and Social Research Council in the UK (RES-000-22-1398).



Hide All
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation, a theory of grammatical function changing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language, 279362. New York: Wiley.
Bowerman, M. & Brown, P. (2007). Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data, 839–80. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development 79, 1152–67.
DuBois, J. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63, 4252.
Farmer, A. (1980). On the interaction of morphology and syntax. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for Case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory, 190. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology 31, 4181.
Fisher, C., Hall, G., Rakowitz, S. & Gleitman, L. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua 92, 333–75.
Fukuda, M. (1993). Head government and case marker drop in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1), 168–72.
Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1, 355.
Göksun, T, Küntay, A. C. & Naigles, L. (2008). Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 35, 291323.
Goldberg, A. E. (2004). But do we need universal grammar? A comment on Litz et al. (2003). Cognition 94, 7784.
Golinkoff, R. M., Jacquet, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Nandakumar, R. (1996). Lexical principles may underlie the learning of verbs. Child Development 67(6), 3101–119.
Guerriero, S., Oshima-Takane, Y. & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: A discourse−pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language 3, 823–57.
Hakuta, K. (1982). Interaction between particles and word order in the comprehension and production of simple sentences in Japanese children. Developmental Psychology 18, 6275.
Hale, K. (1980). Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: Comments on the papers on Japanese syntax in Theoretical Issues in Japanese Linguistics. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 185203.
Hoji, H. (1985). Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Ishii, T. (1999). The JUN Corpus. Unpublished.
Kuno, S. (1972). Functional Sentence Perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3(3), 269320.
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1979) Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. New York: Garland Publishing.
Landau, B. & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lee, J. & Naigles, L. (2008). Mandarin learners use syntactic bootstrapping in verb acquisition. Cognition 106(2), 1028–37.
MacWhinney, B (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Vol. 1: Transcription format and programs. Volume 2: The database. 3rd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Morikawa, H. (1989). Acquisition of case marking and predicate−argument structures in Japanese: A longitudinal study of language acquisition mechanisms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
Naigles, L. R. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 17, 357–74.
Naigles, L., Bavin, E. & Smith, M. (2005). Toddlers recognize verbs in novel situations and sentences. Developmental Science 8, 424–31.
Naigles, L. & Kako, E. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition. Child Development 64(6), 1665–87.
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N. & Murty, L. (2005). Argument realization in Hindi caregiver–child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37(4), 461–95.
Nishiyama, K. (1999). Adjectives and the copulas in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Languages 8, 183222.
Okubo, A. (1967). Yooji gengo no hattatsu [Development of Child Language]. Tokyp: Tokyodo.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rispoli, M. (1987). The acquisition of the transitive and intransitive action verb categories in Japanese. First Language 7, 183200.
Rispoli, M. (1989). Encounters with Japanese verbs: Caregiver sentences and the categorization of transitive and intransitive action verbs. First Language 9, 5780.
Rispoli, M. (1991). The acquisition of verb subcategorization in a functionalist framework. First Language 11(31), 4163.
Rispoli, M. (1995). Missing arguments and the acquisition of predicate meanings. In Tomasello, M. & Merriman, W. E. (eds), Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs, 331–52. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ross, J. R. (1969). Guess who? In Binnick, Robert I., Davison, Alice, Green, Georgia M. and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–86. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, MIT.
Schafer, G. & Plunkett, K. (1998) Rapid word learning by fifteen-month-olds under tightly controlled conditions. Child Development 69, 309320.
Shibamoto, J. (1985). Japanese women's language. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Shibatani, M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shibatani, M. (2001). Non-canonical constructions in Japanese. In Aikhenvald, A. Y., Dixon, R. M. W. & Onishi, M. (eds), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 307348. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Suzuki, T. (2000). Multiple factors in morphological case-marking errors. Studies in Language Science 1, 123–34.
Swensen, L., Kelley, E., Fein, D. & Naigles, L. (2007). Children with autism display typical language learning characteristics: Evidence from preferential looking. Child Development 78, 542–57.
Takezawa, K. (1987). A configurational approach to case marking in Japanese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Yokoyama, M. (1997). Bumpo no kakutoku (2) [Acquisition of Grammar]. In Kobayashi, H. & Sasaki, M. (eds), Kodomotati no gengo kakutoku in, 131–51. Tokyo: Taishukan.

Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings*



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed