Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Morphosyntax in children with word finding difficulties


Children with word finding difficulties (CwWFDs) are slower and less accurate at naming monomorphemic words than typically developing children (Dockrell, Messer & George, 2001), but their difficulty in naming morphologically complex words has not yet been investigated. One aim of this paper was to identify whether CwWFDs are similar to typically developing children at producing inflected (morphologically complex) words. A second aim was to investigate whether the dual-mechanism model could account for the use of morphology in a sample of CwWFDs, exemplifying the notion that regular inflections are part of a rule-based system and computed on-line, while irregular inflections are retrieved directly from the associative system (Pinker, 1999). The inflectional knowledge of a group of CwWFDs was compared against a group of language age-matched typically developing peers in three experiments. In Experiment 1 children produced the past tenses of high- and low-frequency regular and irregular English verbs. In Experiment 2 children generalized their knowledge of the past tense system onto nonsense verbs and in Experiment 3 children produced past tenses of verbs used in either a denominal or a verb root context. In each of these three studies, the CwWFDs performed similarly to matched typical children, suggesting that they do not have a selective problem with morphosyntactic features of words. The findings provide mixed support for the dual-mechanism model.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Victoria A. Murphy, Department of Education, University of Oxford, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford, OX2 6PY. Email:
Hide All

This research was funded by a grant from the ESRC RHP0043. We would like to thank all the children and schools for their willingness to take part in the studies.

Hide All
Berko J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150–77.
Clahsen H. & Almazan M. (1998). Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition 68, 167–98.
Cohen J. D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M. & Povost J. (1993). Psyscope: an interactive graphics system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 25, 257–71.
Constable A., Stackhouse J. & Wells B. (1997). Developmental word-finding difficulties and phonological processing: the case of the missing handcuffs. Applied Psycholinguistics 18, 507–36.
Dockrell J. E., Messer D. & George R. (2001). Patterns of naming objects and actions in children with word finding difficulties. Language and Cognitive Processes 16, 261–86.
Ellis N. C. & Schmidt R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes 13, 307–36.
Francis W. N. & Kucera H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
German D. J. (1989). A diagnostic model and a test to assess word-finding skills in children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 24, 2139.
German D. J. & Simon E. (1991). Analysis of children's word-finding skills in discourse. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34, 309–16.
Goldman R. & Fristoe M. (2000). Test of Articulation 2. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.
Joanisse M. F. & Seidenberg M. S. (1998). Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 240–47.
Kim J. J., Marcus G. F., Pinker S., Hollander M. & Coppola M. (1994). Sensitivity of children's inflection to grammatical structure. Journal of Child Language 21, 173209.
McGregor K. & Appel A. (2002). On the relationship between mental representations and naming in a child with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 16, 120.
McGregor K. & Waxman S. (1998). Object naming at multiple hierarchical levels: A comparison of preschoolers with and without word-finding deficits. Journal of Child Language 25, 419–30.
Messer D., Dockrell J. E. & Murphy N. (2004). Relation between naming and literacy in children with word-finding difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(3), 462–70.
Miozzo M. (2003). On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition 87, 101–27.
Murphy V. A. (2004). Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 433–59.
Pinker S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Prasada S. & Pinker S. (1993). Similarity-based and rule-based generalizations in inflectional morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 156.
Prasada S., Pinker S. & Snyder W. (1990). Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-generated. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, New Orleans, November 1990.
Raven J. (1982). The coloured progressive matrices. Dumfries: H. K. Lewis and Co. Ltd.
Semel E., Wiig E. K. & Secord W. 1986. The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Ullman M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92, 231–70.
Ullman M. T., Maloof C. J., Hartshorne J. K., Estabrooke I. V., Brovetto C. & Walenski M. (under revision). Sex, regularity, frequency and consistency: A study of factors predicting the storage of inflected forms.
van der Lely H. K. J. & Ullman M. T. (2001). Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes 16, 177217.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 141 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.