Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T13:42:35.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the role of logically constrained sentences in the comprehension of ‘before’ and ‘after’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Robert D. Kavanaugh
Robert D. Kavanaugh
Affiliation:
Williams College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sentences were constructed in which the terms before and after were embedded in logically constrained and logically reversible sequences. As in French & Brown (1977), pre-school children found the constrained sentences easier to comprehend. These findings add a new dimension to Clark's (1971) original before and after study in which the effect of logically constrained sentences was not considered. The results of the two studies are consistent with a growing literature (including current formulations of semantic feature theory) which implicates contextual cues and child strategies in the comprehension process, and raises questions about the role of parental speech in the child's comprehension of temporal terms.

Information

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 353 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Clark, E. V. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. JVLVB 10. 266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition 2. 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1975). Knowledge, context, and strategy in the acquisition of meaning. In Dato, D. P. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1977). Strategies and the mapping probem in first language acquisition. In Macnamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Garnica, O. K. (1974). Is he coming or going? On the acquisition of deictic verbs. JVLVB 13. 559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, L. A. & Brown, A. (1977). Comprehension of before and after in logical and arbitrary sequences. JChLang 4. 247–56.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, R. D. (1977). Effects of sentence type on the comprehension of before and after. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar