Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:19:46.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overextensions in early language comprehension: evidence from a signal detection approach*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Douglas A. Behrend
Douglas A. Behrend*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
Developmental Psychology, 3433 Mason Hall, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies of children's early language comprehension were performed using the signal detection paradigm introduced by Thomas et al. (1981). Experiment 1 replicated the original findings of Thomas et al., demonstrating that 13-month-olds understand a word that a parent reported they would understand and did not understand a word that a parent reported they would not. In Experiment 2, the procedure was modified to test for overextensions in early language comprehension. On half of the trials, children saw an array of objects including a referent for a ‘known word’. On the other half, the array included an object perceptually similar to the referent of the known word, but which itself was not an appropriate referent (e.g. an apple instead of an orange). Though the children demonstrated an understanding of the known word, they also overextended that word to the inappropriate referent. Mechanisms for such overextensions are discussed, as is the general relationship between comprehension and production.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 63 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was carried out while the author was a predoctoral trainee at the Center for Research in Human Learning at the University of Minnesota. Portions of this work were presented at the Boston University Conference on Language and Language Development, 1984. The author would like to thank Pat Broen for her assistance in all phases of this research and Susan Gelman for comments on an earlier draft of this article.

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6. 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. S. & Thomson, J. (1980). What is the source of overextension errors in comprehension testing of two-year-olds? A reply to Fremgen and Fay. Journal of Child Language 7. 575–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language: New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Hecht, B. F. (1983). Comprehension and production. Annual Review of sychology 34. 325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremgen, A. & Fay, D. (1980). Overextensions in production and comprehension: a methodological clarification. Journal of Child Language 7. 205–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleason, J. B. & Weintraub, S. (1978). Input language and the acquisition of communicative competence. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's Language. Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origins of language comprehension. In Solso, R. L. (ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: the Loyola symposium. Potomac MD: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. (1979). Young children's overextension of object words in comprehension and/or production: support for a prototype theory of early object word meaning. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Newhoff, M. & Fey, M. E. (1980). Some instances of word usage without comprehension. Journal of Child Language 7. 186–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C. B. & Canada, K. (1983). On the existence of competence errors in early comprehension: a reply to Fremgen & Fay and Chapman & Thomson. Journal of Child Language 10. 431–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straight, H. S. (1980). Auditory versus articulatory phonological processes and their development in children. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Child phonology. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. G., Campos, J. J., Shucard, D. W., Ramsay, D. S. & Shucard, J. (1981). Semantic comprehension in infancy: a signal detection analysis. Child Development 52. 798–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. & Chapman, R. S. (1977). Who is ‘Daddy’ revisited: the status of two-year-olds' overextended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Child Language 4. 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84. 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar