Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols*

  • ANN SUTTON (a1), NATACHA TRUDEAU (a1), JILL MORFORD (a2), MONICA RIOS (a1) and MARIE-ANDRÉE POIRIER (a1)...
Abstract

Children who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems while they are in the process of acquiring language face unique challenges because they use graphic symbols for communication. In contrast to the situation of typically developing children, they use different modalities for comprehension (auditory) and expression (visual). This study explored the ability of three- and four-year-old children without disabilities to perform tasks involving sequences of graphic symbols. Thirty participants were asked to transpose spoken simple sentences into graphic symbols by selecting individual symbols corresponding to the spoken words, and to interpret graphic symbol utterances by selecting one of four photographs corresponding to a sequence of three graphic symbols. The results showed that these were not simple tasks for the participants, and few of them performed in the expected manner – only one in transposition, and only one-third of participants in interpretation. Individual response strategies in some cases lead to contrasting response patterns. Children at this age level have not yet developed the skills required to deal with graphic symbols even though they have mastered the corresponding spoken language structures.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Ann Sutton, École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7.
Footnotes
Hide All
[*]

This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Research Council of Canada. Parts of the data were presented at the American Speech–Language–Hearing Association meeting in Philadelphia in November 2004 and at the American Speech–Language–Hearing Association meeting in Boston in November 2007. The authors wish to thank all the children who participated in the study and the research assistants who collected the data.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Acredolo, L. & Goodwyn, S. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development 59, 450–66.
Barton, A., Sevcik, R. & Romski, M. (2006). Visual–graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 22, 1020.
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
Beukelman, D. & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults, 3rd edn.Baltimore: Brookes.
Blockberger, S. & Sutton, A. (2003). Towards linguistic competence: The language experiences and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. In Light, J., Beukelman, D. & Reichle, J. (eds), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC, 63–106. Baltimore: Brookes.
Bruno, J. & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 22, 300313.
Callaghan, T. (2005). Developing an intention to communicate through drawing. Enfance 1, 4556.
Callaghan, T. & Rankin, M. (2002). Emergence of graphic symbol functioning and the question of domain specificity: A longitudinal training study. Child Development 73, 359–76.
Chute, D. (1996). PowerLaboratory for Macintosh. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Clancy, P., Lee, H. & Zoh, M. (1986). Processing strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses: Universal principles and language-specific realizations. Cognition 24, 225–62.
DeLoache, J. & Burns, N. (1994). Symbolic functioning in preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 15, 513–27.
DeLoache, J., Pierroutsakos, S. & Uttal, D. (2003). The origins of pictorial competence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12, 114–18.
Dunn, L., Thériault-Whalen, C. & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Toronto: Psycan.
Fallon, K., Light, J. & Achenbach, A. (2003). The semantic organization patterns of young children: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 19, 7485.
Fischer, K. W. & Rose, S. P. (1996). Dynamic growth cycles of brain and cognitive development. In Thatcher, R., Lyon, G. R., Rumsey, J. & Krasnegor, N. (eds), Developmental neuroimaging: Mapping the development of brain and behavior, 263–80. New York: Academic Press.
Gelman, R., Bullock, M. & Meck, E. (1980). Preschoolers' understanding of simple object transformations. Child Development 51, 691–99.
Genesee, F., Paradis, J. & Crago, M. (2004). Dual language development and disorders. Baltimore: Brookes.
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language development, Volume 2, 301334. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Feldman, H. (1977). The development of language-like communication without a language model. Science 197(4301), 401403.
Golomb, C. (2004). The child's creation of a pictorial world, 2nd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Groupe coopératif en orthophonie – Région Laval, Laurentides, Lanaudière (1995). Épreuve de compréhension de Carrow-Woolfolk, adaptation française du Test of Auditory Comprehension of Language-R. Montréal: Ordre des orthophonistes et audiologistes du Québec.
Johnson, R. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer Johnson.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: Evidence from children's drawing. Cognition 34, 5783.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Sims, K., Jones, M.-C. & Cuckle, P. (1996). Rethinking metalinguistic awareness: Representing and accessing knowledge about what counts as a word. Cognition 58, 197219.
Lust, B. (2006). Child language: Acquisition and growth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCune, L. (1995). A normative study of representational play in the transition to language. Developmental Psychology 31, 198206.
Mineo Mollica, B. (2003). Representational competence. In Light, J., Beukelman, D. & Reichle, J. (eds), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice, 107145. Baltimore: Brookes.
Namy, L. (2005). Symbol use and symbolic representation: Developmental and comparative perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paul, R. (1998). Communication development in augmented modalities: Language without speech? In Paul, R. (ed.), Exploring the speech–language connection, 139–62. Baltimore: Brookes.
Picard, D. & Vintner, A. (2005). Development of graphic formulas for the depiction of familiar objects. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29, 418–32.
Rochat, P. & Callaghan, T. (2005). What drives symbolic development? In Namy, L. (ed.), Symbol use and symbolic representation: Developmental and comparative perspectives, 2546. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sevcik, R. (2006). Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation 28, 159–67.
Sevcik, R. & Romski, M. (2002). The role of language comprehension in establishing augmented conversations. In Reichle, J., Beukelman, D. & Light, J. (eds), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators, 453–74. Baltimore: Brookes.
Siegler, R. S. (1994). Cognitive variability: A key to understanding cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science 3, 15.
Smith, M. M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In von Tetzchner, S. & Jensen, M. H. (eds), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, 119–36. London: Whurr.
Smith, M. M. & Grove, N. C. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In Light, J., Beukelman, D. & Reichle, J. (eds), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice, 163–98. Baltimore: Brookes.
Soto, G. (1999). Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message formulation structure. In Loncke, F., Clibbens, J., Arvidson, H. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice, 4048. London: Whurr.
Stephenson, J. & Linfoot, K. (1996). Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 12, 244–54.
Sutton, A. (1997). Children's comprehension performance prior to mastery of relative clauses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Sutton, A., Gallagher, T., Morford, J. P. & Shahnaz, N. (2000). Relative clause sentence production using augmentative and alternative communcation systems. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 473–86.
Sutton, A., Gallagher, T., Morford, J. P. & Shahnaz, N. (2002). Interpretation of graphic symbol utterances. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 18, 205213.
Sutton, A., Morford, J. & Gallagher, T. (2004). Production and comprehension of graphic symbol utterances expressing complex propositions by adults who use AAC systems. Applied Psycholinguistics 25, 349–71.
Tomasello, M. & Merriman, W. (1995). Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S. & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children: The effect of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech–Language–Hearing Research 50, 1314–29.
Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Morford, J., de Broeck, S., Dagenais, E., Pauzé, A.-M. & Vallée, V. (2006). Producing and interpreting symbol sequences: The impact of language development. Paper presented at the 12th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Dusseldorf, Germany, August.
von Balkom, H. & Welle Donker-Gimbrère, M. (1996). A psycholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In von Tetzchner, S. & Jensen, M. H. (eds), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, 153–70. London: Whurr.
Wilkinson, K., Sevcik, R. & Romski, M. (1993). Emergence of visual graphic symbol combinations by youth with moderate or severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 883–95.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed