Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Preschoolers' comprehension of pronouns and reflexives: the impact of the task*

  • CHRISTINA BERGMANN (a1), MARKUS PAULUS (a2) and PAULA FIKKERT (a3)

Abstract

Pronouns seem to be acquired in an asymmetrical way, where children confuse the meaning of pronouns with reflexives up to the age of six, but not vice versa. Children's production of the same referential expressions is appropriate at the age of four. However, response-based tasks, the usual means to investigate child language comprehension, are very demanding given children's limited cognitive resources. Therefore, they might affect performance. To assess the impact of the task, we investigated learners of Dutch (three- and four-year-olds) using both eye-tracking, a non-demanding on-line method, and a typical response-based task. Eye-tracking results show an emerging ability to correctly comprehend pronouns at the age of four. A response-based task fails to indicate this ability across age groups, replicating results of earlier studies. Additionally, biases seem to influence the outcome of the response-based task. These results add new evidence to the ongoing debate of the asymmetrical acquisition of pronouns and reflexives and suggest that there is less of an asymmetry than previously assumed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Christina Bergmann, Faculty of Arts, Radboud University, P. O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands. e-mail: C.Bergmann@let.ru.nl

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

The authors wish to thank the team at the Baby Research Centre Nijmegen, the Netherlands, which greatly supported this study, in particular Angela Khadar. Furthermore, we are thankful to the two anonymous reviewers and the editors who provided insightful recommendations on a previous version of this article.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Aguiar, A. & Baillargeon, R. (2000). Perseveration and problem solving in infancy. In Reese, H. W. (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 27, 135–80. San Diego: Academic Press.
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38(4), 419–39.
Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S. & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(4), 527–65.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX Lexical Database. [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science 255(5044), 556–59.
Bloom, P., Barss, A., Nicol, J. & Conway, L. (1994). Children's knowledge of binding and coreference: Evidence from spontaneous speech. Language 70(1), 5371.
Chien, Y. C. & Wexler, K. (1990). Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1(3), 225–95.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: the Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Conroy, A., Takahashi, E., Lidz, J. & Phillips, C. (2009). Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40(3), 446–86.
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., Ponomarev, I. & Saults, J. S. (1999). The role of attention in the development of short-term memory: Age differences in the verbal span of apprehension. Child Development 70(5), 1082–97.
de Villiers, J., Cahillane, J. & Altreuter, E. (2006). What can production reveal about Principle B? In Deen, K. U., Nomura, J., Schulz, B. & Schwartz, B. D. (eds), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition–North America, 89100. Connecticut: University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.
Diedrich, F. J., Highlands, T. M., Spahr, K. A., Thelen, E. & Smith, L. B. (2001). The role of target distinctiveness in infant perseverative reaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 78(3), 263–90.
Elbourne, P. (2005). On the acquisition of Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3), 333–65.
Francis, W. N. & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Grodzinsky, Y. & Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1), 69–101.
Hallett, P. E. (1986). Eye movements. In Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J. P. (eds), Handbook of perception and human performance, 10-1–10-112. New York: Wiley.
Hauf, P., Paulus, M. & Baillargeon, R. (2011). Infants use compression information to infer objects' weights: Examining cognition, exploration, and prospective action in a preferential-reaching task. Paper conditionally accepted for publication in Child Development.
Hendriks, P. & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition [Editorial]. Lingua 120(8), 1887–97.
Hendriks, P. & Spenader, J. (2005/2006). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition 13(4), 319–48.
Hendriks, P., Spenader, J. & Smits, E. (2008). Frequency-based constraints on reflexive forms in Dutch. In Villadsen, J. & Henning, C. (eds), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Constraints and Language Processing, 3347. Roskilde: Computer Science Research Reports.
Hillert, D. & Ackerman, F. (2002). Accessing and parsing phrasal predicates. In Dehé, N., Jackendoff, R., McIntyre, A. & Urban, S. (eds), Verb-particle-explorations, 289313. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jakubowicz, C. (1984). On markedness and binding principles. In Jones, C. & Sells, P. (eds), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 14, 154–82, Amherst: GLSA.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3), 599626.
Pyykkönen, P., Matthews, D. & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(1), 115–29.
Reinhart, T. (2011). Processing or pragmatics? Explaining the coreference delay. In Gibson, E. & Pearlmutter, N. J. (eds) The processing and acquisition of reference, 157–94. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reuland, E. J. (2001). Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32(3), 439–92.
Ruigendijk, E., Baauw, S., Zuckerman, S., Vasic, N., de Lange, J. & Avrutin, S. (2011). A cross-linguistic study on the interpretation of pronouns by children and agrammatic speakers: Evidence from Dutch, Spanish and Italian. In Gibson, E. & Pearlmutter, N. J. (eds), The processing and acquisition of reference, 133–55. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sekerina, I., Stromswold, K. & Hestvik, A. (2004). How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns? Journal of Child Language 31(1), 123–52.
Smith, L. B. & Thelen, A. (2003). Development as a dynamic system Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(8), 343–48.
Spenader, J., Smits, E. J. & Hendriks, P. (2009). Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Journal of Child Language 36(1), 352.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K. & Sedivy, J. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension. Science 268(5217), 1632–34.
Thelen, E., Schoner, G., Scheier, C. & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 186.
Trueswell, J. & Gleitman, L. R. (2004). Children's eye movements during listening: Evidence for a constraint-based theory of parsing and word learning. In Henderson, J. M. & Ferreira, F. (eds), Interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world, 319–46. New York: Psychology Press.
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. & Logrip, M. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73(2), 89–134.
Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision (trans. B. Haigh). New York: Plenum Press.
van Kampen, N. J. (1994). The learnability of the left branch condition. In Bok-Bennema, R. & Cremers, C. (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 8394. Amsterdam/Philadelpha: John Benjamins.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed