Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B. & Sigmann, H. (2014). Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Software]. R-package version 1.1-6. Online: <http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4> (last accessed 1 May 2014).
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K. & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language
Cain, K. & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology
Cain, K., Patson, N. & Andrews, L. (2005). Age- and ability-related differences in young readers’ use of conjunctions. Journal of Child Language
Degand, L., Lefèvre, N. & Bestgen, Y. (1999). The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension. Document Design
Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language
Dragon, N., Berendes, K., Weinert, S., Heppt, B. & Stanat, P. (2015). Ignorieren Grundschulkinder Konnektoren? – Untersuchung einer bildungssprachlichen Komponente [Do primary school children ignore connectives? – Investigation of a literary component]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft
Evers-Vermeul, J. & Sanders, T. (2009). The emergence of Dutch connectives: how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language
Goldman, S. R. & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: a comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology
Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K. & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology
Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Isberner, M.-B. & Richter, T. (2013). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica
Kail, M. & Weissenborn, J. (1984). A developmental cross-linguistic study of adversative connectives: French ‘mais’ and German ‘aber/sondern’. Journal of Child Language
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T. & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: sorting things out. Discourse Processes
Katz, E. W. & Brent, S. B. (1968). Understanding connectives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Knoepke, J., Richter, T., & Diener, P. (2015). Processing local coherence relations as a function of polarity and of position of the connective in German. Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text & Discourse, July.
Knoepke, J. & Richter, T. (in press). Reading comprehension: individual differences, disorders, and underlying cognitive processes. In Bar On, A. & Ravid, D. (eds), Handbook of communication disorders: theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Köhne, J. & Demberg, V. (2013). The time-course of processing discourse connectives. In Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N. & Wachsmuth, I. (eds), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013, Berlin). Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R-package version 2.06. Online: <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html> (last accessed June 2014).
Maury, P. & Teisseranc, A. (2005). The role of connectives in science text comprehension and memory. Language and Cognitive Processes
Millis, K. K., Golding, J. M. & Barker, G. (1995). Causal connectives increase inference generation. Discourse Processes
Millis, K. K. & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language
Murray, J. D. (1995). Logical connectives and local coherence. In Lorch, R. F. Jr. & O'Brien, E. J. (eds), Sources of coherence in reading, 107–25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murray, J. D. (1997). Connectives and narrative text: the role of continuity. Memory and Cognition
Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In Kantowitz, B. H. (ed.), Human information processing: tutorials in performance and cognition, 41–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Richter, T., Isberner, M.-B., Naumann, J. & Kutzner, Y. (2012). Prozessbezogene Diagnostik von Lesefähigkeiten bei Grundschulkindern [Process-based assessment of reading skills in pimary school children]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie
Richter, T., Isberner, M.-B., Naumann, J. & Neeb, Y. (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading
Richter, T., Naumann, J., Isberner, M.-B., Neeb, Y. & Knoepke, J. (in press). ProDi-L: Prozessbezogene Diagnostik des Leseverstehens bei Grundschulkindern [Process-based assessment of reading skills in primary school children] [Computerized test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Sanders, T. J. M., Land, J. & Mulder, G. (2007). Linguistic markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts. Information Design Journal
Sanders, T. J. M. & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing, Discourse Processes
Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M. & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes
Schroeder, S., Würzner, K.-M., Heister, J., Geyken, A. & Kliegl, R. (2015). childLex: a lexical database for German read by children. Behavior Research Methods, 86, 155–165.
Spooren, W. P. M. & Sanders, T. J. M. (2008). The acquisition order of coherence relations: on cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics
Van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Van Silfhout, G., Evers-Vermeul, J., Mak, W. M. & Sanders, T. J. M. (2014). Connectives and layout as processing signals: how textual features affect students’ processing and text representation. Journal of Educational Psychology
Van Veen, R., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T. J. M. & Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Parental input and connective acquisition: a growth curve analysis. First Language
Van Veen, R., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T. J. M. & Van den Bergh, H. (2013). The influence of input on connective acquisition: a growth curve analysis of English because and German weil
. Journal of Child Language
Wing, C. S. & Scholnick, E. K. (1981). Children's comprehension of pragmatic concepts expressed in ‘because’, ‘although’, ‘if’ and ‘unless’. Journal of Child Language