Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Restrictions on addition: children's interpretation of the focus particles auch ‘also’ and nur ‘only’ in German*

  • FRAUKE BERGER (a1) and BARBARA HÖHLE (a1)

Abstract

Children up to school age have been reported to perform poorly when interpreting sentences containing restrictive and additive focus particles by treating sentences with a focus particle in the same way as sentences without it. Careful comparisons between results of previous studies indicate that this phenomenon is less pronounced for restrictive than for additive particles. We argue that this asymmetry is an effect of the presuppositional status of the proposition triggered by the additive particle. We tested this in two experiments with German-learning three- and four-year-olds using a method that made the exploitation of the information provided by the particles highly relevant for completing the task. Three-year-olds already performed remarkably well with sentences both with auch ‘also’ and with nur ‘only’. Thus, children can consider the presuppositional contribution of the additive particle in their sentence interpretation and can exploit the restrictive particle as a marker of exhaustivity.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Frauke Berger, Linguistics Department, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. e-mail: fberger@uni-potsdam.de

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

This research was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center ‘Information structure’ – SFB 632, Project C3 ‘L1-Acquisition of linguistic means to mark information structure: Prosodic, syntactic and lexical aspects’. We are grateful to Nadja Kühn, Caroline Magister, Eva Gercke, Silvia Dobler, Anne Adelt, Maja Stegenwallner and Marie Zielina for assistance in recruiting and testing participants, to Antje Sauermann and Silvana Poltrock for their support in the statistical analyses of the data, and to Robin Hörnig, Thomas Weskott and Malte Zimmermann, as well as to Edith L. Bavin and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M. & Dai, B. (2008). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. (R package version 0.999375-31) [Software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Bergsma, W. (2002). Children's interpretations of Dutch sentences with the focus particle alleen (‘only’). In Lasser, I. (ed.), The process of language acquisition: Proceedings of the 1999 GALA Conference, 263–80. Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang.
Bergsma, W. (2006). (Un)stressed ook in Dutch. In van Geenhoven, V. (ed.), Semantics in acquisition, 329–48). Dordrecht: Springer.
Costa, J. & SzendrŐi, K. (2006). Acquisition of focus marking in European Portuguese – Evidence for a unified approach to focus. In Torrens, V. & Escobar, L.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages, 319–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Crain, S., Ni, W. & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing and modularity. In Clifton, C., Frazier, L. & Rayner, K. (eds), Perspectives on sentence processing, 443–67. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crain, S. & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Davies, C. & Katsos, N. (2010). Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua 120(8), 1956–72.
Dimroth, C. (2009). Stepping stones and stumbling blocks: Why negation accelerates and additive particles delay the acquisition of finiteness in German. In Dimroth, C. & Jordens, P. (eds), Functional categories in learner language, 137–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Drozd, K. & van Loosbroek, E. (1998). Dutch children's interpretation of focus particle constructions. Poster presented at the 23rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
von Fintel, K. (2008). What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22(1), 137–70.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3, 4158. New York: Academic Press.
Gualmini, A., Maciukaite, S. & Crain, S. (2003). Children's insensitivity to contrastive stress in sentences with ONLY. In Arunachalam, S., Kaiser, E. & Williams, A. (eds), Proceedings of PLC 25, 87–110. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Heizmann, T. (2007). Child acquisition of exhaustivity in clefts. In Caunt-Nulton, H., Kulatilake, S. & Woo, I. (eds), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 298309. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hendriks, P. & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Introduction to special issue on asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua 120(8), 1887–97.
Höhle, B., Berger, F., Müller, A., Schmitz, M. & Weissenborn, J. (2009). Focus particles in children's language: Production and comprehension of auch ‘also’ in German learners from 1 year to 4 years of age. Language Acquisition 16(1), 3666.
Horn, L. R. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Binnick, R. I., Davison, A., Green, G. & Morgan, J. (eds), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 98–107. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior 13, 530–83.
Hüttner, T., Drenhaus, H., van de Vijver, R. & Weissenborn, J. (2004). The acquisition of the German focus particle auch ‘too’: Comprehension does not always precede production. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. & Smith, C. E. (eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, on-line supplement. Retrieved from <www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp.html>.
Karttunen, L. & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. In Oh, C.-K. & Dinneen, D. A. (eds), Syntax & Semantics Volume 11: Presupposition, 156. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
Katsos, N. & Smith, N. (2010). Pragmatic tolerance and speaker–comprehender asymmetries. In Franich, K., Iserman, K. M. & Keil, L. L. (eds), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston Conference in Language Development, 221–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Kim, C. (2008). Processing presupposition: Verifying sentences with (‘only’). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(1). Retrieved from, http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss1/17>.
König, E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.
Krifka, M. (1999). Additive particles under stress. In Strolovitch, D. & Lawson, A. (eds), Proceedings of SALT 8, 111–28. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Kripke, S. A. (2009). Presupposition and anaphora: Remarks on the formulation of the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 40(3), 367–86.
Matsuoka, K. (2004). Addressing the syntax/semantics/pragmatics interface: The acquisition of the Japanese additive particle mo. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. & Smith, C. E. (eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, On-line supplement. Retrieved from <www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp.html>.
Matsuoka, K., Miyoshi, N., Hoshi, K., Ueda, M., Yabu, I. & Hirata, M. (2006). The acquisition of Japanese focus particles: Dake ‘only’ and mo ‘also’. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T. & Zaller, C. (eds), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development, On-line supplement. Retrieved from <www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp.html>.
Müller, A. (2010). Wie interpretieren Kinder nur? Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Informationsstruktur. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.
Müller, A., Höhle, B., Schmitz, M. & Weissenborn, J. (2009). Information structural constraints on children's early language production: The acquisition of the focus particle auch (‘also’) in German-learning 12- to 36-month-olds. First Language 29(4), 373–99.
Müller, A., Schulz, P. & Höhle, B. (2011). Pragmatic children: How German children interpret sentences with and without the focus particle only. In Meibauer, J. & Steinbach, M. (eds), Experimental pragmatics/semantics, 79–100. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Müller, A., Schulz, P. & Höhle, B. (in press). How the understanding of focus particles develops: Evidence from child German. In Pirvulescu, M., Cuervo, C., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Steele, J. & Strik, N. (eds), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2010). Somerville: MA, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Nederstigt, U. (2003). Auch and noch in child and adult German. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Notley, A., Zhou, P., Crain, S. & Thornton, R. (2009). Children's interpretation of focus expressions in English and Mandarin. Language Acquisition 16(4), 240–88.
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition 78, 165–88.
Papafragou, A. (2006). From scalar semantics to implicature: Children's interpretation of aspectuals. Journal of Child Language 33, 721–57.
Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86, 253–82.
Papafragou, A. & Tantalou, N. (2004). Children's computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition 12(1), 7182.
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Rowland, C. & Filik, R. (2003). Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition 89, 263–94.
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., White, D., Filik, R. & Jaz, K. (2006). Children's interpretation of ambiguous focus in sentences with ‘only’. Language Acquisition 13(3), 253–84.
Penner, Z., Tracy, R. & Weissenborn, J. (2000). Where scrambling begins: Triggering object scrambling at the early stage in German and Bernese Swiss German. In Powers, S. M. & Hamann, C. (eds), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, 127–64. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 2.11.0) [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447–57.
Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6), 701721.
SzendrŐi, K. 2004. Acquisition evidence for an interface theory of focus. In van Kampen, J. & Baauw, S. (eds), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2003, 457–68. Utrecht: LOT.
Taglicht, J. (1984). Message and emphasis. On focus and scope in English. London, New York: Longman.
Zhou, P. & Crain, S. (2010). Focus identification in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 37, 965–1005.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Restrictions on addition: children's interpretation of the focus particles auch ‘also’ and nur ‘only’ in German*

  • FRAUKE BERGER (a1) and BARBARA HÖHLE (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.