Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:40:52.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of cognitive development and linguistic input in language acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

I. M. Schlesinger
I. M. Schlesinger
Affiliation:
Hebrew University, Jerusalem, and Israel Institute of Applied Social Research
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent years have witnessed a cognitivist reaction against previous views of language learning. It had been held that mere exposure to language is a sufficient condition for language acquisition, whether by hypothesis testing (Katz 1966) or through passive learning (Braine 1971). Symptomatic of this approach were experiments investigating the learning of grammar in which subjects were taught artificial miniature languages without meaning, either through making guesses and receiving feedback from the experimenter (e.g. Hunt 1965) or passively, just by listening (Braine 1971). Although no such claim was explicitly made, language learning was actually treated as if it occurred independently of cognitive development. This one-sided approach has since been corrected by the cognitivists as represented in particular by the Geneva school (Sinclair 1971), who stress the importance of general cognitive development in language acquisition. Experiments with artificial languages bear the imprint of this approach and now involve semantic referents of the linguistic symbols (e.g. Moeser & Bregman 1972, 1973).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 153 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

A shorter version of this paper was presented at the National Council for Research conference on ‘The effects of the environment on cognitive functioning’ (chaired by Charles Greenbaum), held in Arad, Israel, in October 1974. I have benefited from helpful criticism by Daniel Frankel, Charles Greenbaum, Anat Ninio, and Edy Veneziano, and comments by Jerome Bruner, John Macnamara and Walburga von Raffler-Engel. Special thanks are due to Mordechai Rimor and Etha Frenkel for their perceptive reading of drafts of this paper and their many suggestions for improvement in presentation.

References

REFERENCES

Blank, M. (1974). Cognitive functions of language in the preschool years. DevPsych 10. 229–45.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 40.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Miller, P. & Hood, L. (in press). Variation and reduction as aspects of competence in language development. In Pick, A. (ed.), The 1974 Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Structural relationships in children's utterances: syntactic or semantic? In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of rules for word use and sentence construction. In Morehead, D. M. & Morehead, A. E. (eds), Normal and deficient language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1971). On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In Slobin, D. L. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 41.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R. & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P. & Walter, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the production of visually perceived form. JExpPsych 15. 73–86.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1953). The philosophy of symbolic forms. Vol. I: Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1974). The development of language and cognition: the cognition hypothesis. In Foss, B. (ed.), New perspectives in child development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Daniel, T. C. (1972). Nature of the effect of verbal labels on recognition memory for form. JExpPsych 96. 152–7.Google ScholarPubMed
De Rivera, J. (1959). Some conditions governing the use of the cue-producing response as an explanatory device. JExpPsych 57. 299–304.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, D. (1973). Sensory-motor intelligence and semantic relations in early child grammar. Cognition 2. 395–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. (1976). Constraints on actions: a source of early meanings in child language. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Furth, H. G. & Youniss, J. (1971). Formal operations and language: a comparison of deaf and hearing adolescents. IJPsychol 6. 49–66.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. J. (1975). The representation of semantic relations in a manual language created by deaf children of hearing parents: a language you can't dismiss out of hand. Tech. Rep. 26. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1954). Das Passiv. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Herman, D. T., Lawless, R. H. & Marshall, R. W. (1957). Variables in the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived forms. PerceptMotSkills 7. 171–86.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. (1965). Selection and reception conditions in grammar and concept learning. JVLVB 4. 211–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, P. A. (1963). Effects of labels on children's perception and discrimination learning. JExpPsych 66. 423–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, J. J. (1966). The philosophy of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E. & Macnamara, J. (1974). What's in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. ChDev 45. 469–73.Google Scholar
Loftus, E. F. & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory. JVLVB 13. 585–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). The cognitive basis of language learning in children. PsychRev 79. 1–13.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1974). Semiotic extension. Paper presented at the Loyola symposium on cognition.Google Scholar
Moeser, S. D. & Bregman, A. S. (1972). The role of reference in the acquisition of a miniature artificial language. JVLVB 11, 759–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeser, S. D. & Bregman, A. S. (1973). Imagery and language acquisition. JVLVB 12. 91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsychRev 81. 267–85.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1974). Relational concepts underlying language. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Language perspectives – acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1976). Is there a natural word-order? In von Raffler-Engel, W. & Lebrun, Y. (eds), Baby talk and infant speech. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (in press). Production and comprehension of utterances. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sinclair-de-Zwart, H. (1967). Acquisition du langage et développement de la pensée: soussystèmes linguistiques et opérations concrètes. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1971). Sensorimotor action patterns as a condition for the acquisition of syntax. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: models and methods. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies in child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. (1973). Analysis of wish sentences in the one-word stage of language acquisition: a cognitive approach. Unpublished master's thesis, Tufts University, Boston.Google Scholar
Von Raffler-Engel, W. (1964). Ilprelinguaggio infantile. Brescia: Paideia.Google Scholar
Waismann, F. (1962). The resources of language. In Black, M. (ed.), The importance of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar