Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:56:00.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rule discovery in phonological acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Marc E. Fey
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Jack Gandour
Affiliation:
Purdue University

Abstract

Menn has suggested that most early phonological rules have the effect of reducing the variety of the child's phonetic output forms. This proposal is compatible with the Interactionist–Discovery (I–D) theory of phonological acquisition. This paper presents one child's unique phonological rule which increases output variety and yet still yields a mismatch with the adult form. Evidence is presented which indicates that the rule was a stable and productive part of the child's phonology and that it was both phonetically and phonologically motivated. It is argued that an addition to the early strategies described by Menn is needed to account, specifically, for the discovery of this unique rule and, generally, for later stages of phonological development.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Review of N. V. Smith, The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Lg 52. 489–98.Google Scholar
Branigan, G. (1976). Syllabic structure and the acquisition of consonants: the great conspiracy in word formation. PsycholingRes 5. 117–33.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donegan, P. J. & Stampe, D. (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen, D. A.. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Farwell, C. B. (1976). Some strategies in the early production of fricatives. PRCLD 12. 97104.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1975). Surface contrast in phonology: evidence from children's speech. JChLang 2. 287–92.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1979). Phonological patterns in the speech of young children. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M.. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. & Menn, L. (1977). On the acquisition of phonology. In Macnamara, J.. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1971). Phonotactic rules in beginning speech: a study in the development of English discourse. Lingua 26. 225–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1976). Evidence for an interactionist-discovery theory of child phonology. PRCLD 12. 169–77.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1978 a). Pattern, control and contrast in beginning speech. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1978 b). Phonological units in beginning speech. In Bell, A. & Hooper, J.. (eds), Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Menn, L. (1979). Transition and variation in child phonology: modeling a developing system. Proc. 9th Int. Cong. Phon. Sci. Vol. 11, 169–75. Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. & Menn, L. (1979). Early strategies for the perception and production of words and sounds. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M.. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1937). An example of vowel-harmony in a young child. MLN 52. 508–9.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Stern, C. & Stern, W. (1928). Die Kindersprache: eine psychologische und sprachtheorische Untersuchung. (4th edn.) Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar