Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:33:18.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The semantic development of negation: a cross-linguistic longitudinal study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Soonja Choi
Soonja Choi*
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo
*
Department of Linguistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Negative utterances were collected longitudinally from two English-, five French- and four Korean-speaking children between 1;7 and 3;4. An analysis focusing on both non-verbal context and linguistic form led to the distinction of nine semantic/pragmatic categories which could capture cognitive and linguistic development in some detail: non-existence, prohibition, rejection, failure, denial, inability, epis-temic negation, normative and inferential negation. The nine categories were found in all three languages and their developmental order was similar across the languages. Different patterns were shown concerning the form-function relationship for different categories; for some categories, the distinct form emerged gradually after the function was acquired, while for others, the distinct form emerged simultaneously with the new function. Thus new forms emerged to subdivide an old category or to express a new function. This pattern was most typical for categories developed at later periods. It is suggested that whereas cognitive development precedes language development at an early period, at later periods cognitive and language development interact with each other.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , October 1988 , pp. 517 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is a revised version of a part of the author's doctoral dissertation. I would like to thank Dr David Zubin, major adviser, and Drs Joan Bybee and Judy Duchan, advisers on the dissertation, for their continuous support for the project and their valuable comments provided throughout the research period. I would also like to thank Lois Bloom, Julie Gerhardt and Alison Gopnik for their valuable criticisms on an earlier version of this paper. The project was partly supported by Doctoral Dissertation Grant # BNS-8405033 from the National Science Foundation.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1967). A transformational analysis of the development of negation. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M. (1973). One word at a time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budwig, N. (1985). I, me, my and ‘name’: children's early systematizations of forms, meanings and functions in talking about the self. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 24. 30–7.Google Scholar
Choi, S. (1986). A cross-linguistic developmental study of negation in English, French, and Korean. Doctoral dissertation, SUNY at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. (ed.), Cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dromi, E. & Berman, R. (1982). A morphemic measure of early language development: data from modern Hebrew. Journal of Child Language 9. 403–24.Google Scholar
Gee, J. & Savasir, I. (1985). On the use of ‘will’ and ‘gonna’: toward a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes 8. 143–75.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. (1982). Words and plans: early language and the development of intelligent action. Journal of Child Language 9. 173–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A. & Meltzoff, A. (1986). Relationships between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage: the specificity hypothesis. Child Development 57. 1040–53.Google Scholar
Hahn, K. P. (1981). The development of negation in one Korean child. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Ito, K. (1981). Two aspects of negation in child language. In Dale, P. D. & Ingram, D. (eds), Child language – an international perspective. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. & McNeill, N. B. (1973). What does a child mean when he says ‘no’? In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds), Studies in child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Pea, R. D. (1980). The development of negation in early child language. In Olson, D. R. (ed.), The social foundations of language and thought. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Tomasello, E. & Parrar, M. (1984). Cognitive bases of lexical development: object permanence and relational words. Journal of Child Language 11. 477–93.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. & Antinucci, F. (1979). Negation in child language: a pragmatic study. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar