Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T02:01:32.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strategies in the acquisition of deixis*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Eve V. Clark  and
C. J. Sengul
Eve V. Clark
Affiliation:
Stanford University
C. J. Sengul
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although deictic terms are among the earliest words children acquire, the proximal/non-proximal contrast (the true deictic contrast) between here and there, and between this and that, takes several years to master. As research on spontaneous production shows, children may start, for example, by using here with a deictic meaning, there with a non-deictic meaning, and a gesture to indicate a deictic contrast. On the basis of two experiments on comprehension, we argue that children go through at least three stages in acquiring the deictic contrasts. They start with NO CONTRAST, work out a PARTIAL CONTRAST used only in certain contexts, and finally master a FULL CONTRAST equivalent to the adult's. However, children follow different routes through these stages, depending on their initial choice of (a) the point of reference for the contrast – themselves or the speaker – and (b) the spatial relation to that point of reference – proximity or distance.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1978 , pp. 457 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, M. (1974). Prerequisites for reference. Paper presented at the British Association for Applied Linguistics meeting,University of Newcastle-on-Tyne.Google Scholar
Bateman, W. G. (1914). A child's progress in speech, with detailed vocabularies. JEdPsych 5. 307–20.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. MPQ 21. 205–26.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (eds), (1964). The acquisition of language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 29 (Serial No. 92).Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1976). Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1. 1–14.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Boyd, W. (1914). The development of a child's vocabulary. Pedagogical Seminary 21. 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 41 (Serial No. 164).Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. JChLang 2. 1–19.Google Scholar
Carter, A. L. (1975). The transformation of sensori-motor morphemes into words: a case study of the development of ‘here’ and ‘there’. Papers & Reports on Child Language Development 10. 31–48. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Carter, A. L. (1978). Learning to point with words: The structural evolution of attention-directing communication in the second year. In Lock, A. (ed.), Action, gesture, and symbol: the emergence of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition 2. 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1974). Normal states and evaluative viewpoints. Lg 50. 316–32.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1975). Knowledge, context, and strategy in the acquisition of meaning. In Dato, D. P. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on languages and linguistics 1975. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1978). From gesture to word: on the natural history of deixis in language acquisition. In Bruner, J. S. & Garton, A. (eds), Human growth and development. Wolfson College lectures 1976. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Garnica, O. K. (1974). Is he coming or going? On the acquisition of deictic verbs. JVLVB 13. 556–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Collis, G. M. (1977). Visual co-orientation and maternal speech. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, P. & de Villiers, J. G. (1974). On this, that, and the other: non-egocentrism in very young children. JExpChPsych 18. 438–47.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & McGarrigle, J. (1974). Some clues to the nature of semantic development. JChLang 1. 185–94.Google Scholar
Escalona, S. K. (1973). Basic modes of social interaction: their emergence and patterning during the first two years of life. MPQ 19. 205–32.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Lectures on deixis. Unpublished manuscript, Summer Program in Linguistics, University of California at Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Frei, H. (1944). Systèmes de déictiques. Acta Linguistica 4. 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheorgov, I. A. (1905). Die ersten Anfänge des sprachlichen Ausdrucks für das Selbst-bewusststein bei Kindern. Archive für gesamte Psychologic 5. 329–404.Google Scholar
Grant, J. R. (1915). A child's vocabulary and its growth. Pedagogical Seminary 22. 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. (1974). That there deixis I: that. Unpublished paper, University of York.Google Scholar
Huxley, R. (1970). The development of the correct use of subject personal pronouns in two children. In d'Arcais, G. B. Flores & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kernan, K. T. (1969). The acquisition of language by Samoan children. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J. (1964). The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag.Google Scholar
Lange, S. & Larsson, K. (1973). Syntactical development of a Swedish girl Embla, between 20 and 42 months of age, I: Age 20–25 months. Report No. 1, Project Child Language Syntax, Institutionem for Nordiska Sprak, Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Lempers, J. D., Flavell, E. L. & Flavell, J. H. (1977). The development in very young children of tacit knowledge concerning visual perception. Genetic Psychology Monographs 95. 3–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Leopold, W. F. (1949). Speech development of a bilingual child (4 vols.). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lindner, G. (1898). Aus dem Naturgarten der Kindersprache. Leipzig: Grieben.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. M. & Messer, D. J. (1977). Mothers, infants, and pointing: a study of a gesture. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 38 (Serial No. 149).Google Scholar
Nice, M. M. (1915). The development of a child's vocabulary in relation to environment. Pedagogical Seminary 23. 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T.-Z. (1970). Language acquisition in a Korean child. Unpublished manuscript, Psychologisches Institut, Universität Bern.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1926). Language and thought of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaurr, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. F., Hay, D. F. & West, M. J. (1976). Sharing in the second year of life. ChDev 47. 1148–58.Google Scholar
Richards, M. M. (1976). Come and go revisited: children's use of deictic verbs in contrived situations. JVL VB 15. 655–65.Google Scholar
Sanches, M. (1968). Features in the acquisition of Japanese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Snyder, A. D. (1914). Notes on the talk of a two-and-a-half year old boy. Pedagogical Seminary 21. 412–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, C. & Stern, W. (1928). Die Kindersprache: eine psychologische und sprachtheoretische Untersuchung (rev. 4th. ed.). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Tanz, C. (1976). The acquisition of deictic terms. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Thorne, J. P. (1972). On the notion ‘definite’. FL. 8. 562–68.Google Scholar
van der Geest, T. (1975). Some aspects of communicative competence and their implications for language acquisition. Amsterdam: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Webb, P. A. & Abrahamson, A. A. (1976). Stages of egocentrism in children's use of this and that: a different point of view. JChLang 3. 349–67.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar