Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Testing an input-based account of children's errors with inflectional morphology: an elicited production study of Japanese

  • Tomoko TATSUMI (a1), Ben AMBRIDGE (a1) and Julian M. PINE (a1)
Abstract

This study tested the claim of input-based accounts of language acquisition that children's inflectional errors reflect competition between different forms of the same verb in memory. In order to distinguish this claim from the claim that inflectional errors reflect the use of a morphosyntactic default, we focused on the Japanese verb system, which shows substantial by-verb variation in the frequency distribution of past and nonpast forms. 22 children aged 3;2–5;8 (Study 1) and 26 children aged 2;7–4;11 (Study 2) completed elicited production studies designed to elicit past and nonpast forms of 20 verbs (past-biased and nonpast-biased). Children made errors in both directions, using past forms in nonpast contexts, and vice versa, with the likelihood of each determined by the frequency bias of the two forms in the input language, even after controlling for telicity. This bi-directional pattern provides particularly direct evidence for the role of frequency-sensitive competition between stored forms.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Testing an input-based account of children's errors with inflectional morphology: an elicited production study of Japanese
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Testing an input-based account of children's errors with inflectional morphology: an elicited production study of Japanese
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Testing an input-based account of children's errors with inflectional morphology: an elicited production study of Japanese
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford St South, L69 7ZA. E-mail: tomokota@liverpool.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Aguado-Orea, J., & Pine, J. M. (2015). Comparing different models of the development of verb inflection in early child Spanish. PloS One, 10(3), e0119613.
Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90(2), 119–61.
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 4161.
Ambridge, B., et al. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42, 239–73.
Andersen, R. W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viborg, A. (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 309–39). Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgincreole connection. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–70). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Antinucci, F., & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3(2), 167–89.
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19(3), 241–48.
Barr, D. J., et al. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–78.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 148.
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–90.
Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 128.
Bybee, J. L. (1991). Natural morphology: the organization of paradigms and language acquisition. In Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories, (Vol. 2) (pp. 6792). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Bybee, J. L. (2006). From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–33.
Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: a multi-disciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 9911060.
Clahsen, H., Aveledo, F., & Roca, I. (2002). The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language, 29, 591622.
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 373524), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–88.
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J., & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 643–69.
Gries, S. T. (2015). More (old and new) misunderstandings of collostructional analysis: on Schmid and Küchenhoff (2013). Cognitive Linguistics, 26(3), 505–36.
Grinstead, J. (1998). Subjects, sentential negation and imperatives in child Spanish and Catalan (Doctoral dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles.
Guasti, M. T. (1993). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3(1), 140.
Hartshorne, J. K., & Ullman, M. T. (2006). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Developmental Science, 9(1), 2132.
Johnson, B. W., & Fey, M. E. (2006). Interaction of lexical and grammatical aspect in toddlers’ language. Journal of Child Language, 33(2), 419–35.
Kato, S., et al. (2003). ‘Root infinitives’: Nihongo karano kensho [‘Root infinitives’: from the perspective of Japanese]. Tohoku University Linguistics Journal, 12, 113–27.
Legate, J. A., & Yang, C. (2007). Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition, 14(3), 315–44.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Matthews, D. E., & Theakston, A. L. (2006). Errors of omission in English-speaking children's production of plurals and the past tense: the effects of frequency, phonology, and competition. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1027–52.
Murasugi, K. (2015). Root infinitive analogues in child Japanese. In Nakayama, M. (Ed.). Handbook of Japanese psycholinguistics (pp. 117–47). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Murasugi, K., Nakatani, T., & Fuji, C. (2010). The roots of root infinitive analogues: the surrogate verb forms common in adult and child grammars. Poster presented at BUCLD, 34.
Nisisawa, H. Y., & Miyata, S. (2009). Japanese – MiiPro – Nanami Corpus. Pittsburgh, PA: TalkBank.
Nisisawa, H. Y. & Miyatam, S. (2010). Japanese – MiiPro – ArikaM Corpus. Pittsburgh, PA: TalkBank.
Otomo, K., Miyata, S., & Shirai, Y. (2015). Doosi no gobi keitaiso no kakutoku katei: Kakutoku no zyunzyosei to hahaoya kara no gengo teki nyuuryoku tono kanrennsei [The acquisition of verb morphology in Japanese: order of acquisition and relationships with maternal language input]. Hattatsu Shinrigaku Kenkyuu [Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology], 26(3), 197209.
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1/2), 813.
Pizzuto, E., & Caselli, M. C. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 491557.
Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 156.
R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from <https://www.R-project.org>.
Radford, A., & Ploennig-Pacheco, I. (1995). The morphosyntax of subjects and verbs in child Spanish: a case study. Essex Reports in Linguistics, 5, 2367
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B., and Pine, J. M. (2014). Infinitives or bare stems? Are English-speaking children defaulting to the highest-frequency form? Journal of Child Language, 41(4), 756–79.
Räsänen, S. H. M., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2016). An elicited-production study of inflectional verb morphology in child Finnish. Cognitive Science, 40, 1704–38.
Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Redmond, S. M. (1999). Grammaticality judgments of an extended optional infinitive grammar: evidence from English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(4), 943–61.
Sano, T. (2002). Roots in language acquisition. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Shirai, Y. (1993). Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese. In Nakajima, H. & Otsu, Y. (Eds), Argument structure: its syntax and acquisition (pp. 185211). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Shirai, Y. (1998). The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: universal predisposition? First Language, 18(54), 281309.
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language, 71(4), 743–62.
Shirai, Y., & Miyata, S. (2006). Does past tense marking indicate the acquisition of the concept of temporal displacement in children's cognitive development? First Language, 26, 4566.
Tatsumi, T., Ambridge, B., & Pine, J. M. (2017). Disentangling effects of input frequency and morphophonological complexity on children's acquisition of verb inflection: an elicited production study of Japanese. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12554.
Tatsumi, T., & Pine, J. M. (2016). Comparing generativist and constructivist accounts of the use of the past tense form in early child Japanese. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1365–84.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Valian, V. (2006). Young children's understanding of present and past tense. Language Learning and Development, 2(4), 251–76.
Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28(3), 661–81.
Wagner, L. (2002). Understanding completion entailments in the absence of agency cues. Journal of Child Language, 29(01), 109–25.
Wagner, L. (2006). Aspectual bootstrapping in language acquisition: telicity and transitivity. Language Learning and Development, 2(1), 5176.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 2379.
Wexler, K., Schaeffer, J., & Bol, G. (2004). Verbal syntax and morphology in Dutch normal and SLI children: how developmental data can play an important role in morphological theory. Syntax, 7(2), 148–98.
Wulff, S., et al. (2009). The acquisition of tense–aspect: converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 354–69.
Wurm, L. H., & Fisicaro, S. A. (2014). What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 3748.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 21
Total number of PDF views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 11th May 2018 - 22nd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.