Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T04:19:38.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation sets in the speech directed to toddlers in Argentinian households.SES and type of activity effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2021

Florencia ALAM Open the ORCID record for Florencia ALAM [Opens in a new window] ,
Celia Renata ROSEMBERG ,
Leandro GARBER  and
Alejandra STEIN Open the ORCID record for Alejandra STEIN [Opens in a new window]
Florencia ALAM*
Affiliation:
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CIIPME-CONICET) University of Buenos Aires
Celia Renata ROSEMBERG
Affiliation:
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CIIPME-CONICET) University of Buenos Aires
Leandro GARBER
Affiliation:
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CIIPME-CONICET) University of 3 de Febrero
Alejandra STEIN
Affiliation:
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CIIPME-CONICET) University of Buenos Aires
*
Address for correspondence: Florencia Alam National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CIIPME-CONICET) florenciaalam@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study adopts a naturalistic perspective, looking at the relationship between socio-economic status (SES), activities and variation sets in child-directed speech (CDS) to Spanish-speaking Argentinian toddlers. It aims to determine the effect of SES and type of activity on the proportion of words and utterances in variation sets and on the pragmatic function they serve in interaction. Thirty two children (mean: 14.3 months) and their families were audio-recorded for four hours and the middle two hours were analyzed using CLAN. We developed an automatic algorithm for variation sets extraction that compares noun, verb and adjective lexemes in successive utterances. Mixed-effects beta regression showed SES and activity type effects on the proportion of variation sets and on the pragmatic function served by variation sets. Findings revealed that the contextual variables considered impact on how interlocutors organize the information to young children at the local level of natural at home interactions.

Keywords

toddlerspartial self-repetitionsSESinputnaturalistic study

Information

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , July 2022 , pp. 799 - 823
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Presidente Teniente General Juan Domingo Perón 2158, C1040AAH, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 54-11-4953-1477

References

Abelenda, N., Canevari, J., & Montes, N. (2016). Territorios de mayor vulnerabilidad social en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Recorrido en perspectiva histórica sobre aspectos estructurales no resueltos. Población de Buenos Aires, Vol 13, núm. 23, 7–30. Dirección General de Estadística y Censos: Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Alarcos Llorach, E. (1994). Gramática de la lengua española [Spanish grammar] Espasa Calpe – Real Academia Española.Google Scholar
Altınkamış, N. F., Kern, S., & Sofu, H. (2014). When context matters more than language: Verb or noun in French and Turkish caregiver speech. First Language, 34(6), 537–550. doi:10.1177/0142723714560179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergelson, B., Amatuni, A., Dailey, S., Koorathota, S., & Tor, S. (2018). Day by day, hour by hour: Naturalistic language input to infants. Developmental Science, e12715. doi:10.1111/desc.12715.Google ScholarPubMed
Bernstein Ratner, N., & Brundage, S. (2015). A clinician's complete guide to CLAN and PRAAT. Talkbank Organization: https://talkbank.org/manuals/Clin-CLAN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. H., & Corwin, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brodsky, P., & Waterfall, H. (2007). Characterizing motherese: On the computational structure of child-directed language. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 29, No. 29).Google Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27(6), 843–873.10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, M., Amatuni, A., Seidl, A., Söderström, M., Warlaumont, A., & Bergelson, E. (2017). What do Babies hear? Analyses of child- and adult-directed speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2017 (pp. 2093–2097). doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribari-Neto, F., & Zeileis, A. (2010). Beta Regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 34(i02). doi:10.18637/jss.v034.i02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, L. C., Kariger, P., Hidrobo, M., & Gertler, P. J. (2012). Socioeconomic gradients in child development in very young children: Evidence from India, Indonesia, Peru, and Senegal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Suppl. 2), 17273–17280. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121241109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garber, L. (2019). Variation Sets extractor. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3377965Google Scholar
Glas, L., Rossi, C., Hamdi-Sultan, R., & Batailler, C. (2018). Activity types and child-directed speech: a comparison between French, Tunisian Arabic and English Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 1–34. doi:10.1017/cnj.2018.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (2000). Nouns before verbs in comprehension vs. production: The view from pragmatics. Journal of Child Language, 27(3), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, M. H., Waterfall, H. R., Lotem, A., Halpern, J. Y., Schwade, J. A., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S. (2010). General cognitive principles for learning structure in time and space. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(6), 249–258.10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2003). The Specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74, 1368–1378.10.1111/1467-8624.00612CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1), 55–88. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 4–14. doi: 10.1037/a0027238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, C. (1981). Acquiring language in a conversational context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V.A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish learning children. Developmental Science, 11(6), 31–39.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00768.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children's language growth. Cognitive psychology, 61(4), 343–365.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337–374.10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
INDEC (2014). Encuesta Permanente de Hogares. https://redatam.indec.gob.ar/Google Scholar
INDEC (2020). Incidencia de la pobreza y la indigencia en 31 aglomerados urbanos. Primer semestre de 2020. https://www.indec.gob.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/eph_pobreza_01_200703093514.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kavanaugh, R. D., & Jirkovsky, A. M. (1982). Parental speech to young children: A longitudinal analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28(2), 297–311.Google Scholar
Kaye, K. (1980). Why we don't talk ‘baby talk' to babies. Journal of Child Language, 7(3), 489–507.10.1017/S0305000900002804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuchirko, Y.A., Schatz, J.L., Fletcher, K.F., & Tamis-LeMonda, C.S. (2019). Do, say, learn: the functions of mothers’ speech to infants. Journal of Child Language, 47(1), 64–84. doi:10.1017/S0305000919000308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Küntay, A., & Slobin, D. I. (1996). Listening to a Turkish mother: Some puzzles for acquisition. In Slobin, D.I., Gerhartd, J., Kyratzis, A., & Guo, J. (eds.) Social interaction, social context, and language: essays in honor of Sudan Ervin Tripp (pp. 265–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Küntay, A., & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication, 6(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua, 120(11), 2546–2556.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mastin, J. D., Marchman, V., Elwood-Lowe, M., & Fernald, A. (2016). Quantity and quality of child-directed speech (CDS) predict children's vocabulary size and language processing abilities. Paper presented at 20th Biennial Meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies.Google Scholar
McGillion, M. L., Herbert, J. S., Pine, J. M., Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., & Matthews, D. E. (2013). Supporting early vocabulary development: What sort of responsiveness matters?. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 240–248.10.1109/TAMD.2013.2275949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRoberts, G. W., McDonough, C., & Lakusta, L. (2009). The role of verbal repetition in the development of infant speech preferences from 4 to 14 months of age. Infancy, 14(2), 162–194.10.1080/15250000802707062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R., & Edelman, S. (2008). Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition, 109(3), 423-430.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onnis, L., Edelman, S., Esposito, G., & Venuti, P. (2021). Parental Speech to Typical and Atypical Populations: A Study on Linguistic Partial Repetition. Language Sciences, 83, 101311.10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (2017). Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics. 3, 285–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papousek, M., Papousek, H., & Haekel, M. (1987). Didactic adjustments in fathers’ and mothers’ speech to their 3-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16(5), 491–516.10.1007/BF01073274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psaki, S. R., Seidman, J. C., Miller, M., Gottlieb, M., Bhutta, Z. A., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, A. S., Bessong, P., John, S. M., Kang, G., Kosek, M., Lima, A., Shrestha, P., Svensen, E., & Checkley, W. (2014). Population Health Metrics, 12(8), doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-12-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, L., Migdalek, M.J., Stein, A., Cristia, A., & Rosemberg, C.R. (2016). La función pragmática de las emisiones dirigidas a bebés. Un estudio en hogares de distintos grupos socioeconómicos de Argentina. PRAXIS. Revista de Psicología, 18(29), 91–114.Google Scholar
Rosemberg, C. R., Alam, F., Stein, A., Migdalek, M., Menti, A., & Ojea, G. (2015–2016). El entorno lingüístico de niños pequeños argentinos [Language environments of young Argentinian children]. CONICET.Google Scholar
Rosemberg, C. R., Alam, F., Audisio, C. P., Ramirez, M. L., Garber, L., & Migdalek, M. J. (2020). Nouns and verbs in the linguistic environment of Argentinian toddlers: Socioeconomic and context-related differences. First Language, 40(2), 192–21710.1177/0142723719901226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosemberg, C. R., & Alam, F. (2021). Socioeconomic disparities in the comprehension of lexical categories. A study with Spanish-speaking Argentinian toddlers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1–20.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., Coker, D., & Pan, B. A. (2004). A comparison of fathers’ and mothers’ talk to toddlers in low-income families. Social development, 13(2), 278–291.10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.000267.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española (1983). Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development, and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35: 185–205. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, M. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development, 83(5), 1762–1774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01805.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, M., & Snow, C. (2019). Analyzing input quality along three dimensions: interactive, linguistic and conceptual. Journal of Child Language, 1–17, doi:10.1017/S0305000919000655Google ScholarPubMed
Roy, B. C., Frank, M. C., DeCamp, P., Miller, M., & Roy, D. (2015). Predicting the birth of a spoken word. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(41), 12663–12668.10.1073/pnas.1419773112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwab, J.F., & Lew-Williams, C. (2016) Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech. WIREs Cognitive Science 2016, 7, 264–275. doi:10.1002/wcs.1393Google ScholarPubMed
Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological methods, 11(1), 54–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E., Arlman-Rupp, A., Hassing, Y., Jobse, J., Joosten, J., & Vorster, J. (1976). Mothers' speech in three social classes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, M., & Wittebolle, K. (2013). When do caregivers talk? The influences of activity and time of day on caregiver speech and child vocalizations in two childcare environments. PloS one, 8(11), e80646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderström, M. (2007). Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review, 27(4), 501–532.10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, D. E., Sperry, L. L., & Miller, P. (2019). Reexamining the verbal environments of children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Child Development. doi:10.1111/cdev.13072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, A., Menti, A. B., & Rosemberg, C. R. (2021). Socioeconomic status differences in the linguistic environment: a study with Spanish-speaking populations in Argentina. Early Years, 1–15 doi: 10.1080/09575146.2021.1904383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., & MacKain, K. (1982). Intonation Contours as Signals in Maternal Speech to prelinguistic infants. Developmental Psychology, 18(5), 727–735.10.1037/0012-1649.18.5.727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tal, S., & Arnon, I. (2018a). SES effects on the use of variation sets in child-directed speech. Journal of child language, 45(6), 1423–1438.10.1017/S0305000918000223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tal, S., & Arnon, I. (2018b). SES differences in the communicative functions of variation sets. In BUCLD 42: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 736–49).Google Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Kuchirko, Y., & Song, L. (2014). Why is infant language learning facilitated by parental responsiveness? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 121– 126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414522813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C.S., Kuchirko, Y., Luo, R., Escobar, K., & Bornstein, M.H. (2017). Power in methods: Language to infants in structured and naturalistic contexts. Developmental Science, 20(6), e12456. doi:10.1111/desc.12456CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Custode, S., Kuchirko, Y., Escobar, K., & Lo, T. (2018). Routine language: Speech directed to infants during home activities. Child Development, 90(6), 2135–2152. doi:10.1111/cdev.13089CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiramonti, G. (ed.). (2004). La trama de la desigualdad educativa: mutaciones recientes en la escuela media. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Manantial.Google Scholar
Vanormelingen, L., & Gillis, S. (2016). The influence of socio-economic status on mothers’ volubility and responsiveness in a monolingual Dutch-speaking sample. First Language, 36(2), 140–156.10.1177/0142723716639502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon-Feagans, L., Garrett-Peters, P., Willoughby, M., Mills-Koonce, R., & the Family Life Project Key Investigators (2012). Chaos, poverty, and parenting: Predictors of early language development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 339–351. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–2152. doi:10.1177/0956797613488145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisleder, A., Mendelsohn, A., Villanueva, A., Canfield, C., Cates, C. B., Seery, A., Vasques, S., & Robertson, N. (2019). Language interactions in the homes of Latino infants in the first year of life. Paper presented at the 2019 SRCD Biennial Meeting Society for Research in Child Development. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Waterfall, H. R. (2006). A little change is a good thing: feature theory, language acquisition and variation sets (Doctoral dissertation). University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Waterfall, H. R., Sandbank, B., Onnis, L., & Edelman, S. (2010). An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 37(3), 671–703.10.1017/S0305000910000024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weizman, Z. O., & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: Effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental psychology, 37(2), 265.10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirén, M., Nilsson Björkenstam, K., Grigonytė, G., & Cortes, E. E. (2016). Longitudinal studies of variation sets in child-directed speech. In The 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, August 11, 2016 (pp. 44–52). Association for Computational LinguisticsGoogle Scholar