Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Variations in the recruitment of syntactic knowledge contribute to SES differences in syntactic development*

  • KATHRYN A. LEECH (a1), MEREDITH L. ROWE (a2) and YI TING HUANG (a3)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Average differences in children's language abilities by socioeconomic status (SES) emerge early in development and predict academic achievement. Previous research has focused on coarse-grained outcome measures such as vocabulary size, but less is known about the extent to which SES differences exist in children's strategies for comprehension and learning. We measured children's (N = 98) comprehension of passive sentences to investigate whether SES differences are more pronounced in overall knowledge of the construction or in more specific abilities to process sentences during real-time interpretation. SES differences in comprehension emerged when syntactic revision of passives was necessary, and disappeared when the need to revise was removed. Further, syntactic revision but not knowledge of the passive best explained the association between SES and a standardized measure of syntactic development. These results demonstrate that SES differences in syntactic development may result from how children recruit syntactic information within sentences.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Kathryn A. Leech, University of Maryland – Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, 3304 Benjamin Building, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States. e-mail: kleech@umd.edu
Footnotes
Hide All
*

This work was supported by an NSF IGERT fellowship (#0801465) to KL and a UMCP ADVANCE grant to YTH and MR. We are grateful to L. Abadie, D. Bemaman, M. Kahwaty, K. Lippitt, and others in the Language and Cognition Laboratory for help with data collection and coding, and to Jeff Lidz for commenting on an earlier version of the paper.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AmbridgeB., KiddE., RowlandC. F. & TheakstonA. L. (2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42, 239–73.
ArriagaR. I., FensonL., CronanT. & PethickS. J. (1998). Scores on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory of children from low- and middle-income families. Applied Psycholinguistics 19, 209–23.
BaronR. M. & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–82.
BloomL. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DemuthK. (1989). Maturation, continuity, and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language 65, 5680.
DollaghanC. A., CampbellT. F., ParadiseJ. L., FeldmanH. M., JanoskyJ. E., PitcairnD. N. & Kurs-LaskyM. (1999). Maternal education and measures of early speech and language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 42, 1432–43.
DurhamR. E., FarkasG., HammerC. S., TomblinJ. B. & CattsH. W. (2007). Kindergarten oral language skill: a key variable in the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 25, 294305.
FarkasG. & BeronK. (2004). The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: differences by class and race. Social Science Research 33, 464–97.
FernaldA. & MarchmanV. A. (2011). Causes and consequences of variability in early language learning. In Arnon I. & Clark E. V. (eds), Experience, variation, and generalization: learning a first language (Trends in language acquisition research) , 181202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
FernaldA., MarchmanV. A. & WeislederA. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science 16, 234–48.
FernaldA., PerforsA. & MarchmanV. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology 42, 98116.
FernaldA., PintoJ., SwingleyD., WeinbergA. & McRobertsG. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the 2nd year. Psychological Science 9, 72–5.
FurrowD., NelsonK. & BenedictH. (1979). Mothers’ speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language 6, 423–42.
GoodwinA., FeinD. & NaiglesL. (2014). The role of maternal input in the development of wh-question comprehension in autism and typical development. Journal of Child Language 42, 3263.
GordonP. & ChafetzJ. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives. Cognition 36, 227–54.
HalleT., ForryN., HairE., PerperK., WandnerL., WesselJ. & VickJ. (2009). Disparities in early learning and development: lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Birth Cohort (ECLS-B). Washington, DC: Child Trends.
HartB. & RisleyT. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing.
HoffE. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development 74, 1368–78.
Hoff-GinsbergE. (1986). Function and structure in maternal speech: their relation to the child's development of syntax. Developmental Psychology 22, 155–63.
HuangY. T., ZhengX., MengX. & SnedekerJ. (2013). Children's assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 589606.
HurewitzF., Brown-SchmidtS., ThorpeK., GleitmanL. & TrueswellJ. (2000). One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 597626.
HuttenlocherJ., VasilyevaM., CymermanE. & LevineS. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45, 337–74.
HuttenlocherJ., WaterfallH., VasilyevaM., VeveaJ. & HedgesL. V. (2010). Sources of variability in children's language growth. Cognitive Psychology 61, 343–65.
LidzJ. & GagliardiA. (2015). How nature meets nurture: Universal Grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics 1, 333–53.
MacDonaldM. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 116.
NaiglesL. R. & Hoff-GinsbergE. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language 25, 95120.
NewportE. L., GleitmanH. & GleitmanL. R. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow C. E. & Ferguson C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 109–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NovickJ. M., TrueswellJ. C. & Thompson-SchillS. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: re-examining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 263–81.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: new evidence and possible explanations. In Murnane R. & Duncan G. (eds), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality and the uncertain life chances of low-income children, 91116. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
RescorlaL., RobertsJ. & DahlsgaardK. (1997). Late talkers at 2: outcome at age 3. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 556–66.
RispoliM. & HadleyP. (2014). Input effects on the acquisition of finiteness. Proceedings of the 5th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (pp. 121–127). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
RoweM. L. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of the role of quantity and quality of child-directed speech in vocabulary development. Child Development 83, 1762–74.
RoweM. L. & Goldin-MeadowS. (2009). Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science 323, 951–3.
RowlandC. F., PineJ. M., LievenE. V. & TheakstonA. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: revaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language 30, 609–35.
SeymourH. N., RoeperT., De VilliersJ. G. & De VilliersP. A. (2003). Diagnostic evaluation of language variation: screening test (DELV-ST) . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
StromswoldK., EisenbandJ., NorlandE. & RatzanJ. (2002). Tracking the acquisition and processing of English passives: using acoustic cues to disambiguate actives and passives. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
TaborW. & HutchinsS. (2000). Evidence of self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, 431–50.
TrueswellJ., SekerinaI., HillN. & LogripM. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studyingon-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73, 89134.
WeislederA. & FernaldA. (2013). Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science 24, 2143–52.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 291 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.