Skip to main content

What's in a name? Coming to terms with the child's linguistic environment


This article reviews the proliferation of terms that have been coined to denote the language environment of the young child. It is argued that terms are often deployed by researchers without due consideration of their appropriateness for particular empirical studies. It is further suggested that just three of the dozen or more available terms meet the needs of child language researchers in most instances: child-directed speech, infant-directed speech and exposurelanguage. The phenomena denoted by these terms are then considered. The term register is generally borrowed for this purpose from sociolinguistics. However, close inspection of this concept reveals that the notion of register needs to be constrained, in specified ways, in order to be of any real value within the field of child language research.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Matthew Saxton, Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, University of London, 25 Woburn Square, London, WC1H 0AA, UK. fax: +44 (0)20-7612-6304; e-mail:
Hide All

I am very grateful to the following for information, suggestions and comments, offered via the Info-CHILDES discussion forum ( Ruth Berman, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, John Bohannon, John Bonvillian, Robin Campbell, Leila Gleitman, Keith Nelson, Anat Ninio, Barbara Zurer Pearson, Brian Richards, Dan Slobin, Catherine Snow, Carol Stoel-Gammon, Edy Veneziano, Marilyn Vihman and Fay Wouk. I also thank Dick Hudson for helpful comments.

Hide All
Anderson D. R. & Pempek T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist 48(5), 505–22.
Biber D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: a cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohannon J. N. & Marquis A. L. (1977). Children's control of adult speech. Child Development 48, 1002–8.
Chomsky N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Clark E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cole E. B. & St. Clair-Stokes J. (1984). Caregiver-child interactive behaviours – a videotape analysis procedure. Volta Review 86(4), 200–16.
Cooper R. P. & Aslin R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development 61(5), 1584–95.
Corder S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5, 161–70.
Fernald A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 1497–510.
Gergely G., Egyed K. & Kiraly I. (2007). On pedagogy. Developmental Science 10(1), 139–46.
Gillette J., Gleitman H., Gleitman L. & Lederer A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73(2), 135–76.
Holmes J. (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics, 2nd ed.Harlow: Longman.
Hudson R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iwasaki S. & Horie P. I. (2000). Creating speech register in Thai conversation. Language in Society 29(4), 519–54.
Jakobson R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
Lukens H. T. (1894). Preliminary report on the learning of language. Pedagogical Seminary 3, 424–60.
Mannle S. & Tomasello M. (1987). Fathers, siblings, and the bridge hypothesis. In Nelson K. E. & Kleeck A. van (eds), Children's language, Vol. VI, 2342. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacNeilage P. F. & Davis B. L. (2004). Baby talk and the emergence of first words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(4), 517–8.
Nelson K. E., Denninger M. M., Bonvillian J. D., Kaplan B. J. & Baker N. (1984). Maternal input adjustments and non-adjustments as related to children's linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In Pellegrini A. D. & Yawkey T. D. (eds), The development of oral and written language in social contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Newport E. L. (1975). Motherese: the speech of mothers to young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Ninio A. (1986). The direct mapping of function to form in children's early language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15, 559 (Abstract).
Ochs E. (1982). Ergativity and word order in Samoan child language. Language 58(3), 646–71.
Rowland C. F., Pine J. M., Lieven E. V. M. & Theakston A. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language 30(3), 609–35.
Sanders C. (1993). Sociosituational variation. In Sanders C. (ed.), French today: language in its social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schachter F. F., Fosha D., Stemp S., Brotman N. & Ganger S. (1976). Everyday caretaker talk to toddlers vs. 3s and 4s. Journal of Child Language 3(2), 221–45.
Schlesinger I. M. (1977). Role of cognitive development and linguistic input in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 4(2), 153–69.
Skinner B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sokol R. I., Webster K. L., Thompson N. S. & Stevens D. A. (2005). Whining as mother-directed speech. Infant and Child and Development 14(5), 478–90.
Solano-Flores G. (2006). Language, dialect, and register: sociolinguistics and the estimation of measurement error in the testing of English language learners. Teachers College Record 108(11), 2354–79.
Tardif T., Shatz M. & Naigles L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children's use of nouns versus verbs: a comparison of English, Italian, and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 24(3), 535–65.
Warren-Leubecker A. & Bohannon J. N. (1984). Intonation patterns in child-directed speech – mother-father differences. Child Development 55(4), 1379–85.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 32 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 144 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.