Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Gaeta, Livio 2016. Exaptation and Language Change. Vol. 336, Issue. , p. 57.
    Battistella, Edwin 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. p. 533.
    Liszkowski, U. 2014. Two sources of meaning in infant communication: preceding action contexts and act-accompanying characteristics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 369, Issue. 1651, p. 20130294.
    Deleau, Michel 2012. Language and theory of mind: Why pragmatics matter. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 295.
    ×
  • Get access
    Add to cart USD25.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian

Young children's understanding of markedness in non-verbal communication*

  • KRISTIN LIEBAL (a1), MALINDA CARPENTER (a1) and MICHAEL TOMASELLO (a1)
Abstract

Speakers often anticipate how recipients will interpret their utterances. If they wish some other, less obvious interpretation, they may ‘mark’ their utterance (e.g. with special intonations or facial expressions). We investigated whether two- and three-year-olds recognize when adults mark a non-verbal communicative act – in this case a pointing gesture – as special, and so search for a not-so-obvious referent. We set up the context of cleaning up and then pointed to an object. Three-year-olds inferred that the adult intended the pointing gesture to indicate that object, and so cleaned it up. However, when the adult marked her pointing gesture (with exaggerated facial expression) they took the object's hidden contents or a hidden aspect of it as the intended referent. Two-year-olds' appreciation of such marking was less clear-cut. These results demonstrate that markedness is not just a linguistic phenomenon, but rather something concerning the pragmatics of intentional communication more generally.

Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 2011
Corresponding author
[*]Address for correspondence: Kristin Liebal, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology – Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig D-04103, Germany. E-mail: kliebal@eva.mpg.de
References
Hide All
Arnold, J. E. (2008). THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases. Cognition 108, 69–99.
Battistella, E. L. (1990). Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Battistella, E. L. (1996). The logic of markedness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Behne, T., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2005). One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Developmental Science 8, 492–99.
Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language 15, 317–35.
Clark, E. V. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417–31.
Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 292–314.
Ganea, P. & Saylor, M. M. (2007). Infants' use of shared linguistic information to clarify ambiguous requests for objects. Child Development 78, 493–502.
Grassmann, S. & Tomasello, M. (2007). Two-year-olds use primary sentence accent to learn new words. Journal of Child Language 34, 677–87.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review 66, 377–88.
Haspelmath, M. (2006). Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42, 25–70.
Liebal, K., Behne, T., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Infants use shared experience to interpret pointing gestures. Developmental Science 12, 264–71.
Markman, E. M. & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20, 121–57.
Moll, H., Richter, N., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2008). Fourteen-month-olds know what ‘we’ have shared in a special way. Infancy 13, 90–101.
Saylor, M. M., Baldwin, D. A. & Sabbagh, M. A. (2002). Children use whole–part juxtaposition as a pragmatic cue to word meaning. Developmental Psychology 38, 993–1003.
Saylor, M. M. & Ganea, P. (2007). Infants interpret ambiguous requests for absent objects. Developmental Psychology 43, 696–704.
Saylor, M. M. & Sabbagh, M. A. (2004). Different kinds of information affect word-learning in the preschool years: The case of part-term learning. Child Development 75, 395–408.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M. & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development 78, 705–722.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Child Language
  • ISSN: 0305-0009
  • EISSN: 1469-7602
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-child-language
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 185 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 573 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Cancel
Confirm
×