Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T16:53:47.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 Time to Sustained Recovery between Oral Tablet and Inhaler Placebos in the ACTIV-6 Platform Clinical Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2024

Yue Gao
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Ahmad Mourad
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center
Chris Lindsell
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Clinical Research Institute
Thomas Stewart
Affiliation:
School of Data Science, University of Virginia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Platform trials gain efficiency by sharing placebo controls among different study arms. However, the varying routes of administration make it unclear whether participants exposed to different placebos have similar outcomes. As such, we seek to compare outcomes between participants receiving tablet and inhaler placebos in the ACTIV-6 trial. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: ACTIV-6 is a large, decentralized platform trial exploring repurposed drugs for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate COVID-19. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned to a study arm vs. placebo and then mailed the study drug. They were monitored until symptom resolution or Day 28. Here, we compare outcomes for control participants contributing to the fluticasone furoate study arm, in which 251 were assigned to a tablet placebo and 370 an inhaler placebo. Time to sustained recovery and time to resolution of individual symptoms are compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and unadjusted log-rank tests. A step-down procedure is applied to control the false discovery rate. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Control participants assigned to tablet placebos had shorter time to sustained recovery (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.34 (95% CI 1.11, 1.62)). When examining each of the eleven individually reported symptoms on study Day 14, nasal symptoms (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.44 (0.27, 0.72), p<0.01), dyspnea (OR 0.44 (0.22, 0.87), p = 0.02), and cough (OR 0.54 (0.35, 0.83), p<0.01) were identified as symptoms in which the tablet-placebo group performed notably better than those who received inhaler-placebos. In the follow-up, longitudinal analysis, we anticipate similar results. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Among ACTIV-6 control participants, those receiving a tablet placebo had a significantly shorter time to sustained recovery than those receiving an inhaler placebo. Platform trials using shared controls should consider efficiency in the context of the additional variability when sharing controls with a different route of administration.

Type
Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. The Association for Clinical and Translational Science