Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation

  • Tanha Patel (a1), Julie Rainwater (a2), William M. Trochim (a3), Julie T. Elworth (a4), Linda Scholl (a5), Gaurav Dave (a6) and the Members of the CTSA Evaluation Guidelines Working Group (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4) (a5) (a6)...

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to describe the progress of the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program to address the evaluation-related recommendations made by the 2013 Institute of Medicine’s review of the CTSA Program and guidelines published in CTS Journal the same year (Trochim et al., Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(4): 303–309). We utilize data from a 2018 national survey of evaluators administered to all 64 CTSA hubs and a content analysis of the role of evaluation in the CTSA Program Funding Opportunity Announcements to document progress. We present four new opportunities for further strengthening CTSA evaluation efforts: (1) continue to build the collaborative evaluation infrastructure at local and national levels; (2) make better use of existing data; (3) strengthen and augment the common metrics initiative; and (4) pursue internal and external opportunities to evaluate the CTSA program at the national level. This article will be of significant interest to the funders of the CTSA Program and the multiple stakeholders in the larger consortium and will promote dialog from the broad range of CTSA stakeholders about further strengthening the CTSA Program’s evaluation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: T. Patel, MPH, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. Email: Tnpatel@wakehealth.edu

References

Hide All
1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). Clinical and translational science awards (CTSA) program, 2018. Retrieved from https://ncats.nih.gov/ctsa. Accessed November 1, 2018.
2. Institute of Medicine. The CTSA program at NIH: opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2013/The-CTSA-Program-at-NIH-Opportunities-for-Advancing-Clinical-and-Translational-Research.aspx. Accessed November 5, 2018.
3. Trochim, WM, et al. Evaluation guidelines for the clinical and translational science consortium. Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(4): 303309.
4. American Evaluation Association. Guiding principles for evaluators 2018. Retrieved from https://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51. Accessed November 5, 2018.
5. Patton, MQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 4th ed. London, England: Sage; 2008. 39.
6. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-06-002: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2005. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-06-002.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
7. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-07-002: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2006. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfafiles/RFA-RM-07-002.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
8. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-07-007: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2007. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-07-007.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
9. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-08-002: institutional clinical and translational science award (u54), 2007. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-08-002.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
10. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-09-004: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2009. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-09-004.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
11. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-09-019: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2009. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-09-019.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
12. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-10-001: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2010. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-10-001.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
13. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-RM-10-020: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2010. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-10-020.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
14. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-TR-12-006: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2012. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-TR-12-006.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
15. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). RFA-TR-14-009: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2014. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-TR-14-009.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
16. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). PAR-15-304: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2015. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-15-304.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
17. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). PAR-18-464: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2017. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-18-464.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
18. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). PAR-18-940: institutional clinical and translational science award (U54), 2018. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-18-940.html. Accessed February 6, 2019.
19. Clinical & Translational Science Awards Program (CTSA). Center for Leading Innovation & Collaboration (CLIC). Common metrics, 2018. Retrieved from https://clic-ctsa.org/common_metrics. Accessed February 5, 2019.
20. Research Process Improvement, Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Common metrics initiative, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.tuftsctsi.org/research-services/research-process-improvement/common-metrics-initiative/. Accessed February 3, 2019.
21. Friedman, M. Trying Hard is Not Good Enough. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Clear Impact, 2015. Retrieved from Fiscal Policy Studies Institute website: resultsaccountability.com
22. Kane, C, et al. Heterogeneity at work: implications of the 2012 clinical translational science award evaluators survey. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2013; 36(4): 447463.
23. Frechtling, J, et al. The CTSA National Evaluation Final Report. Bethesda, MD: Westat, 2012.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Patel et al. supplementary material
Patel et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (29 KB)
29 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed