Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T15:30:29.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

264. The effect of variations in the fat percentage and in the reaction (pH) of milk media on the heat resistance of certain milk bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Agnes. A. Nichols
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr, Scotland

Extract

1. A review of the literature shows that the destruction of living microorganisms by heat is a complex process, and that the problem is particularly difficult when it is applied to the heat resistance of spores.

2. The problems involved in the method of heating and in the choice of a container for the inoculated substrate for heat-resistance tests are discussed, with special reference to the difficulties encountered at high temperatures such as are used in studies with spores of aerobic bacteria. Four different types of containers, namely, (a) glass capillary tubes, (b) glass ampoules or bulbs, (c) glass Pasteur pipettes and (d) corked test tubes, have been tested, and the latter were found to fulfil the necessary requirements.

3. A trial test of the heat resistance was conducted on nearly forty strains of aerobic sporeformers isolated from canned milk products, in order to obtain general information regarding the difficulties which might be expected in later and more detailed studies. Many of the strains were found to be exceedingly heat resistant. No dormancy was apparent when the spores were heated and subsequently incubated in milk products. “Skips” were only observed to any great extent among strains of B. licheniformis.

4. Special studies of the heat resistance of three strains of B. subtilis which had produced bitterness and thinning in canned cream were made. Details are given of the methods of preparing spore suspensions for these tests and of preparing the substrates for subsequent inoculation in such a way that equal concentrations of spores are present in the final subsamples.

5. The effect of the reaction of the substrate on the destruction of two of these strains of B. subtilis by heat has been examined, but over the narrow range of pH. tested the results, which have been expressed as survival percentages, lack consistency.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Bigelow, W. B. & Esty, J. R. (1920). J. infect. Dis. 27, 602.Google Scholar
(2) Esty, J. R. & Meyeb, K. F. (1922). J. infect. Dis. 31, 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Burke, G. S. (1923). J. infect. Dis. 33, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Esty, J. R. & Williams, C. C. (1924). J. infect. Dis. 34, 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Dickson, E. C, Bubke, G. S., Beck, D. & Johnston, J. (1925). J. infect. Dis. 36, 472.Google Scholar
(6) Williams, O. B. (1929). J. infect. Dis. 44, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Sommer, E. W. (1930). J. infect. Dis. 46, 85.Google Scholar
(8) Magoon, C. A. (1926). J. Bact. 11, 253.Google Scholar
(9) Magoon, C. A. (1926). J. infect. Dis. 38, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Williams, F. T. (1932). J. Bact. 32, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11) Morrison, E. W. & Rettger, L. F. (1930). J. Bact. 20, 299.Google Scholar
(12) Morrison, E. W. & Rettger, L. F. (1930). J. Bact. 20, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Curran, H. R. (1935). J. infect. Dis. 56, 196.Google Scholar
(14) Howat, G. R. & Wright, N. C. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Nichols, A. A., Howat, G. R. & Jackson, C. J. (1937). J. Dairy Res. 8, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) Mattick, A. T. R. & Nichols, A. A. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 125.Google Scholar
(17) Brown, C. W. & Peiser, K. (1916). Tech. Bull. Mich, agric. Exp. Sta. no. 30.Google Scholar