Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:27:53.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

565. A study of variation in twin cattle: III. Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. W. B. King  and
H. P. Donald
J. W. B. King
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh
H. P. Donald
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Polynomial coefficients have been fitted to data on growth in live weight to 19 months and on height at withers to 27 months of age shown by one-egg (MZ) and two-egg (DZ) twins and pairs of half-sisters (HZ). The coefficients obtained (a0, a2 and a3) have been subjected to analysis of variance.

2. For growth in live weight, the ratio of intrapair variances for MZ, DZ and HZ pairs was 1:6·8:10 for a1, which gives the straight line best fitting the observed curve. Unrelated pairs, it is calculated, would have had an intrapair variance 20·9 times as great as MZ pairs. From the point of view of minimizing the intrapair variance, the advantage of the MZ pairs was usually a little less for a0, and considerably less for a2 and a3.

3. For height at withers, the results were similar to those for weight.

4. The contribution of environmental variance to total intrapair variance increased from a0 to a3, while that due to additive genetic effects diminished. Owing to the wide fiducial limits applicable, the results can be accommodated assuming only additive genetic effects in addition to environmental effects as estimated from one-egg twins. The extent to which HZ pairs exceeded the variance expected, however, suggests that this simple assumption may prove inadequate.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1955 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

(1)Aitken, A. C. (1933). Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 53, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Bonnier, G. & HANSSON, A. (1948). Heredity 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Dick, I. D. & WHITTLE, P. (1951). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. B, 33, 145.Google Scholar
(4)Donald, H. P. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Donald, H. P. & ANDERSON, D. (1953). J. Dairy Res. 20, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Hancock, J. (1951). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 33 (4), 17.Google Scholar
(7)Hancock, J. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A, 35, 189.Google Scholar
(8)Hutt, F. B. (1930). J. Hered. 21, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Knapp, B. (Jr) & Clark, R. T. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Lush, J. L. (1948). The Genetics of Populations. Mimeographed, Ames.Google Scholar
(11)Thoele, H. W. & HERVEY, M. C. (1953). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 494 (Abstract).Google Scholar
(12)Touchberry, R. W. (1951). J. Dairy Sci. 34, 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar