Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:36:50.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential leucocyte count for ewe milk with low and high somatic cell count

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2010

Marzia Albenzio  and
Mariangela Caroprese
Marzia Albenzio*
Affiliation:
Department of Production and Innovation in Mediteranean Agriculture and Food Systems (PrIME), University of Foggia, Italy
Mariangela Caroprese
Affiliation:
Department of Production and Innovation in Mediteranean Agriculture and Food Systems (PrIME), University of Foggia, Italy
*
*For correspondence: m.albenzio@unifg.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare flow cytometry (FC) and direct microscopic leucocyte count (MDLC) for the differentiation of macrophages, lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leucocyte (PMN) and to evaluate leucocyte distribution in ewe milk with low and high somatic cell count (SCC). Milk samples were grouped for somatic cell count in low SCC (LSCC) when the content was lower than 5·00×105/ml and high SCC (HSCC) when the content was higher than 1·00×106/ml. No differences were found between the two methods tested suggesting that FC could be used as a routine test for rapid discrimination of leucocytes. Percentages of lymphocytes in ewe milk were higher in LSCC (50%) than in HSCC (39%) and count ranged from 273·91±56·62×103cells/ml (LSCC) to 308·90±46·15×103cells/ml (HSCC). PMN number was lower in LSCC than in HSCC (248·83±46·87×103cells/ml v. 444·38±58·62×103cells/ml); accordingly the percentage was lower in LSCC (40%) than in HSCC (57%). No differences were found for macrophages which were 36·36±5·51×103cells/ml and 39·32±6·83×103cells/ml in LSCC and HSCC, respectively. Lymphocytes in ewe milk did not vary with increased number of somatic cells and were the predominant cell type in LSCC. PMN represented the main population detected in HSCC and the correlation with SCC evidenced that this leucocyte class could be useful in differentiating ewe milk cell count, being strictly responsible for the SCC increase.

Keywords

Ewe milksomatic cell countdifferential cell countflow cytometry

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 43 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albenzio, M, Caroprese, M, Marino, R, Santillo, A, Taibi, L & Sevi, A 2004 Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on the plasmin activity and cheese-making properties of ewe milk. Journal of Dairy Science 87 533–542Google ScholarPubMed
Albenzio, M, Caroprese, M, Santillo, A, Marino, R, Muscio, A & Sevi, A 2005 Proteolytic patterns and plasmin activity in ewe milk as affected by somatic cell count and stage of lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 72 86–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albenzio, M, Santillo, A, Caroprese, M, d'Angelo, F, Marino, R & Sevi, A 2009 Role of endogenous enzymes in proteolysis of sheep milk. Journal of Dairy Science 92 79–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caroprese, M, Marzano, A, Schena, L, Marino, R, Santillo, A & Albenzio, M 2007 Contribution of milk macrophages to proteolysis and to plasmin activity in ewe bulk milk. Journal of Dairy Science 90 2767–2772CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caroprese, M, Marzano, A, Schena, L & Sevi, A 2008 Immunomagnetic procedure for positive selection of macrophages in ovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1908–1912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuccuru, C, Moroni, P, Zecconi, A, Casu, S, Caria, A & Contini, A 1997 Milk differential cell counts in relation to total counts in Sardinian ewes. Small Ruminant Research 25 169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosogne, H, Vangroenweghe, F, Mehrzad, J, Massart-Leën, AM & Burvenich 2003 Differential leucocyte count method for bovine low somatic cell count milk. Journal of Dairy Science 86 828–834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EEC 92/46. Council directive 92/46/EEC of 16 June 1992 laying down the health rules for the production and placing on the market of raw milk, heat-treated milk and milk-based products. Official Journal L 268 14.9.1992, p 1Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation 1995 Enumeration of somatic cells. Brussels: IDF (FIL-IDF Standard no 148A)Google Scholar
Leitner, G, Shoshani, E, Krifucks, O, Chaffer, M & Saran, A 2000 Milk leucocyte population patterns in bovine udder infection of different aetiology. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 47 581–589Google ScholarPubMed
Kehrly, ME & Shuster, DE 1994 Factors affecting milk somatic cells and their role in health of the bovine mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science 77 619–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, AL, Tiernan, D, O'Sullivan, C & Joyce, P 2000 Correlation between bovine milk somatic cell count and polymorphonuclear leucocyte level for samples of bulk milk and milk from individual cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83 300–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, AL 2003 Milk quality and udder health: test methods and standard. In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Vol 3 (Eds Roginski, H, Fuquay, JW & Fox, PF). Bodmin, Cornwall, UK: MPG Books LimitedGoogle Scholar
Koess, C & Hamann, J 2008 Detection of mastitis in the bovine mammary gland by flow cytometry at early stages. Journal of Dairy Research 75 225–232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrzad, J, Duchateau, L & Burvenich, C 2004 Viability of milk neutrophils and severity of bovine coliform mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 87 4150–4161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgante, M, Ranucci, S, Paeselli, M, Casoli, C & Duranti, E 1996 Total and differential cell count in milk of primiparous Comisana ewes without clinical signs of mastitis. Small Ruminant Research 21 265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillai, SR, Kunze, E, Sordillo, LM & Jayarao, BM 2001 Application of differential inflammatory cell count as a tool to monitor udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 84 1413–1420Google ScholarPubMed
Raynal-Ljutovac, K, Pirisi, A, de Crémpux, R & Gonzalo, C 2007 Somatic cells of goat and sheep milk: Analytical, sanitary, productive and technological aspects. Small Ruminant Research 68 126–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainard, P & Riollet, C 2006 Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Veterinary Research 37 369–400Google ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute 1999 SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.1 ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, SS & Wilk, M 1965 An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52 591–601Google Scholar
Sordillo, LM & Streicher, KL 2002 Mammary gland immunity and mastitis susceptibility. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 2 135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar