Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:20:21.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The digestion of fatty acids in the stomach and intestines of sheep given widely different rations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. E. Storry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. W. G. Nicholson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading

Summary

The amounts of total lipid and fatty acids consumed, leaving the stomach and excreted in the faeces were examined in 4 sheep fitted with rumen and re-entrant duodenal cannulas. Diets of high (HM1) and low (CM1) roughage content were given at 0·9 times maintenance and the low-roughage diet was also given at 1·7 and 2·3 times maintenance. With all the rations more fatty acid left the abomasum than was consumed in the food, the difference being greater on ration CM1 than on ration HM1 and increasing irregularly with the amount of the low-roughage ration fed. Of the fatty acid entering the duodenum in the chyme, 72–89% was digested in the intestine. About 80% of the increase in fatty acids in the stomach was stearic acid and most of the remainder was palmitic acid. Almost all the polyunsaturated C18 acids ingested in the food were hydrogenated in the stomach, and the amounts of oleic acid were also greatly reduced, although more oleic acid entered the duodenum in the chyme with ration CM1 than with ration HM1. The possible origins of the increase in fatty acids in the stomach are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, E. P. & Heath, T. J. (1963). Biochim. biophya. Acta 70, 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1965). The nutrient requirements of farm livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Technical Reviews and Summaries. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Allison, M. J., Bryant, M. P., Katz, I. & Keeney, M. (1962). J. Bact. 83, 1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bath, I. H. & Hill, K. J. (1967). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, J. W., Insull, W. Jr, Rosen, P., Stoffel, W. & Ahrens, E. H. Jr (1959). Nutr. Rev. 17, Suppl.Google Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, J., Williams, P. P., Davis, R. E. & Warwick, E. J. (1962). Appl. Microbiol. 10, 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habel, R. E. (1959). Am. J. vet. Res. 20, 437.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1965). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant, p. 311. (Ed. Dougherty, R. W..) Washington: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Katz, I. & Keeney, M. (1964). Biochim. biophys. Acta 84, 128.Google Scholar
Keeney, M., Katz, I. & Allison, M. J. (1962). J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 39, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leat, W. M. F. & Harrison, F. A. (1969). Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 54, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, A. M. & Garton, G. A. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lough, A. K., Navia, J. M. & Harris, R. S. (1966). J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 43, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, R. D. (1962). In Use of Radioisotopes in Animal Biology and the Medical Sciences, Vol. 2, p. 151. (Ed. Fried, M..) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McGilliard, A. D. (1961). Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, L. D. & Schmitz, A. A. (1961). Analyt. Chem. 33, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, R. A., McCarthy, R. D. & Griel, L. C. Jr (1968). J. Dairy Sci. 51, 1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. M., Ulyatt, M. J., Kay, R. N. B. & Czerkawski, J. W. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 51 A.Google Scholar
Sheremet, Z. I. & Mikhailova, M. M. (1953). In Fiziologiya pitaniya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnylch, p. 275. (Ed. Sineshchekov, A. D.). Moscow: Sel'khozgiz. (The nutritional physiology of farm animals. English Translation, 1964. National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Boston Spa, Yorkshire.)Google Scholar
Sineshchekov, A. D. (1965). Biologiya pitaniya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh: biologicheskie osnovy ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniya kormov. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo ‘Kolos’.Google Scholar
(The biology of nutrition of farm animals. Biological bases of rational feed utilization. Vol. 1, p. 170. English Translation, 1968. National Lending Library for Science and Technology, Boston Spa, Yorkshire.)Google Scholar
Storry, J. E. & Rook, J. A. F. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tove, S. B. & Matrone, G. (1962). J. Nutr. 76, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viviani, R., Borgatti, A. R., Monetti, P. G. & Mordenti, A. (1967). Zentbl. VetMed., A 14, 833.Google Scholar
Wood, R. D., Bell, M. C., Grainger, R. B. & Teekel, R. A. (1963). J. Nutr. 79, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar