Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-2h7tr Total loading time: 0.307 Render date: 2022-06-30T04:37:28.822Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Semi-quantitative method for Staphylococci magnetic detection in raw milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2016

Carla Margarida Duarte*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, University of Lisbon, Portugal INESC–MN Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores – Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias, Lisbon, Portugal
Carla Carneiro
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Susana Cardoso
Affiliation:
INESC–MN Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores – Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias, Lisbon, Portugal Physics Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal
Paulo Peixeiro Freitas
Affiliation:
INESC–MN Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores – Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias, Lisbon, Portugal International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Braga, Portugal
Ricardo Bexiga
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, University of Lisbon, Portugal
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: duarte.margarida72@gmail.com

Abstract

Bovine mastitis is the most costly disease for dairy farmers, hence, control measures to prevent it are crucial for dairy farm sustainability. Staphylococcus aureus is considered a major mastitis pathogen because of its impact on milk quality and low cure rates. Prevention of S. aureus mastitis includes segregation of infected animals, whilst treatment of such animals should be performed for a longer time to improve cure rates. This makes identification of S. aureus infected quarters and animals of significant importance. The experiments reported in this research paper aimed to develop and validate a sensitive method for magnetic detection of S. aureus and of the Staphylococcus genus in raw milk samples. Mastitic milk samples were collected aseptically from 47 cows with subclinical mastitis, from 12 Portuguese dairy farms. Forty nine quarter milk samples were selected based on bacteriological results. All samples were submitted to PCR analysis. In parallel, these milk samples were mixed with a solution combining specific antibodies and magnetic nanoparticles, to be analysed using a lab-on-a-chip magnetoresistive cytometer, with microfluidic sample handling. The antibodies used in this work were a rabbit polyclonal IgG anti-S. aureus ScpA protein and a mouse monoclonal IgM anti-S. aureus ATCC 29740. This paper describes the methodology used for magnetic detection of bacteria, including analysis of false positive/negative results. This immunological recognition was able to detect bacterial presence above 100 cfu/ml, independently of antibody and targeted bacteria used in this work. Comparison with PCR results showed sensitivities of 57·1 and 79·3%, specificity values of 75 and 50%, and PPV values of 40 and 95·8% for magnetic identification of Staphylococci species with an anti-S. aureus antibody and an anti-Staphylococcus spp. antibody, respectively. Some constraints are described as well as the method's limitations in bacterial quantification. Sensitivities and specificities require to be improved, nevertheless, the methodology described may form the basis for a means of identifying S. aureus infected cows at the point of care.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bexiga, R, Rato, MG, Lemsaddek, A, Semedo-Lemsaddek, T, Carneiro, C, Pereira, H, Mellor, DJ, Ellis, KA & Vilela, CL 2014 Dynamics of bovine intramammary infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci on four farms. Journal of Dairy Research 81 208214 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittar, F, Ouchenane, Z, Smati, F, Raoult, D & Rolain, JM 2009 MALDI-TOF MS for rapid detection of staphylococcal Panton–Valentine leucocidin. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 34 467470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, AJ 2002 Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. Veterinary Journal 164 116128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ávila, BEF, Pedrero, M, Campuzano, S, Escamilla-Gómez, V & Pingarrón, JM 2012 Sensitive and rapid amperometric magneto immunosensor for the determination of Staphylococcus aureus . Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 403 917925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, C, Costa, T, Carneiro, C, Soares, R, Jitariu, A, Cardoso, S, Piedade, M, Bexiga, R & Freitas, P 2016 Semi-quantitative method for Streptococci magnetic detection in raw milk. Biosensors 6 19 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duarte, CM, Fernandes, AC, Cardoso, FA, Bexiga, R, Cardoso, S & Freitas, PP 2015a Magnetic counter for group B streptococci detection in milk. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 51 5100304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, CM, Freitas, PP & Bexiga, R 2015b Technological advances in Bovine Mastitis Diagnosis: an overview. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 27 665672 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabres-Klein, MH, Aguilar, AP, Silva, MP, Silva, DM & Ribon, AOB 2014 Moving towards the immunodiagnosis of staphylococcal intramammary infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 33 20952104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, AC, Duarte, CM, Cardoso, FA, Bexiga, R, Cardoso, S & Freitas, PP 2014 Lab-on-chip cytometry based on magnetoresistive sensors for bacteria detection in milk. Sensors 14 1549615524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, AD, Wang, SX & Hansen, MF 2015 On the importance of sensor height variation for detection of magnetic labels by magnetoresistive sensors. Scientific Reports 5 12282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiitiö, H, Riva, R, Autio, T, Pohjanvirta, T, Holopainen, J, Pyörälä, S & Pelkonen, S 2015 Performance of a real-time PCR assay in routine bovine mastitis diagnostics compared with in-depth conventional culture. Journal of Dairy Research 82 200208 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovinen, M, Aisla, A-M & Pyörälä, S 2006 Accuracy and reliability of mastitis detection with electrical conductivity and milk color measurement in automatic milking. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A Animal Sciences 56 121127 Google Scholar
Koskinen, MT, Holopainen, J, Pyörälä, S, Bredbacka, P, Pitkälä, A, Barkema, HW, Bexiga, R, Roberson, J, Sølverød, L, Piccinini, R, Kelton, D, Lehmusto, H, Niskala, S & Salmikivi, L 2009 Analytical specificity and sensitivity of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for identification of bovine mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science 92 952959 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazcka, O, Del Campo, FJ & Muñoz, FX 2007 Pathogen detection: a perspective of traditional methods and biosensors. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 22 12051217 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libing, W, Chuanlai, X, Qianqian, Y, Xiaofang, D, Shanshan, S & Xun, Z 2012 Kit for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in sample and detection method thereof. Pat. No. CN102323416 (A)Google Scholar
Mortari, A & Lorenzelli, L 2014 Recent sensing technologies for pathogen detection in milk: a review. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 60 821 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Mastitis Council (NMC) 1999 Sample collection and handling. In Laboratory Handbook of Bovine Mastitis. Madison, WI, USA: Natl. Mastitis Council Inc Google Scholar
Ohbayashi, T, Irie, A, Murakami, Y, Nowak, M, Potempa, J, Nishimura, Y, Shinohara, M & Imamura, T 2011 Degradation of fibrinogen and collagen by staphopains, cysteine proteases released from Staphylococcus aureus . Microbiology 157 786792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, PJ, Carter, ME, Markey, B & Carter, GR 1994 The Streptococci and related cocci. In Veterinary Clinical Microbiology, pp. 127136 (Eds Mosby). London, UK: Elsevier Google Scholar
Taponen, S, Salmikivi, L, Simojoki, H, Koskinen, MT & Pyörälä, S 2009 Real-time polymerase chain reaction-based identification of bacteria in milk samples from bovine clinical mastitis with no growth in conventional culturing. Journal of Dairy Science 92 26102617 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tenhagen, BA, Koster, G, Wallmann, J & Heuwieser, W 2006 Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. Journal of Dairy Science 89 25422551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truchetti, G, Bouchard, E, Descôteaux, L, Scholl, D & Roy, JP 2014. Efficacy of extended intramammary ceftiofur therapy against mild to moderate clinical mastitis in Holstein dairy cows: a randomized clinical trial. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 78 3137 Google Scholar
van der Woude, MW & Baümler, AJ 2004 Phase and antigenic variation in bacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 17 581611 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walstra, P, Wouters, J & Geurts, T 2006 Dairy Science and Technology, 2nd edn. New York: Taylor & Francis Group Google Scholar
Zschöck, M, Nesseler, A & Sudarwanto, I 2005 Evaluation of six commercial identification kits for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Journal of Applied Microbiology 98 450455 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Semi-quantitative method for Staphylococci magnetic detection in raw milk
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Semi-quantitative method for Staphylococci magnetic detection in raw milk
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Semi-quantitative method for Staphylococci magnetic detection in raw milk
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *