Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T01:19:41.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological properties of indigenous Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from Lait caillé, a spontaneous fermented milk from Burkina Faso

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2020

Geoffroy Romaric Bayili ,
Pernille Greve Johansen ,
Anni Bygvrå Hougaard ,
Bréhima Diawara ,
Georges Anicet Ouedraogo ,
Lene Jespersen  and
Hagretou Sawadogo-Lingani
Geoffroy Romaric Bayili*
Affiliation:
Département Technologie Alimentaire (DTA), IRSAT/CNRST, 03 BP 7047 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso
Pernille Greve Johansen
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Anni Bygvrå Hougaard
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Bréhima Diawara
Affiliation:
Département Technologie Alimentaire (DTA), IRSAT/CNRST, 03 BP 7047 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso
Georges Anicet Ouedraogo
Affiliation:
Université Nazi Boni de Bobo-Dioulasso, 01 BP 1091 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
Lene Jespersen
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Hagretou Sawadogo-Lingani
Affiliation:
Département Technologie Alimentaire (DTA), IRSAT/CNRST, 03 BP 7047 Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso
*
Author for correspondence: Geoffroy Romaric Bayili, Email: jgbroma2000@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experiments reported in this research paper aimed to determine the technological properties of indigenous Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from Lait caillé, a spontaneous fermented milk, from the perspective of starter culture development. Fermentations were conducted to determine the acidification patterns. The ropy character, growth in 0.04 g/ml NaCl and citrate metabolism were additionally tested. Furthermore, the rheological properties of samples from selected strains and the impact of cold storage were evaluated. Based on the rate of acidification, the indigenous strains were divided into 2 groups depending on their fermentation time, i.e. 10–13 h (fast acidifier), and up to 72 h (slow acidifier), respectively. The physiological tests suggested that most of these strains produced exopolysaccharides but none could ferment citrate. The flow properties of the samples inoculated by the fast acidifier strains showed a time-dependent shear thinning behaviour, while their viscoelastic properties corresponded structurally to those of weak gels. Cold storage decreased the viscosity and CFU counts for most of the indigenous strains tested. This study is a step towards the definition of starter cultures for African spontaneous fermented milks such as Lait caillé.

Keywords

Dairy productsindigenous strainslactic acid bacteriatechnological properties
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 110 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Hannah Dairy Research Foundation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akabanda, F, Owusu-Kwarteng, J, Tano-Debrah, , Parkouda, C and Jespersen, L (2014) The use of lactic acid bacteria starter culture in the production of Nunu, a spontaneously fermented milk product in Ghana. International Journal of Food Science 2014, Article ID 721067, 1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Baranyi, J and Roberts, TA (1994) A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. International Journal of Food Microbiology 23, 277–294.Google ScholarPubMed
Bayili, GR, Johansen, P, Nielsen, DS, Sawadogo-Lingani, H, Ouedraogo, GA, Diawara, B and Jespersen, L (2019) Identification of the predominant microbiota during production of lait caillé, a spontaneously fermented milk product made in Burkina Faso. Word Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 35(100), 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Bintsis, T and Athanasoulas, A (2015) Dairy starter cultures. In Papademas, P (ed.), Dairy Microbiology, A Practical Approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 114–154.Google Scholar
Douglas, J (2018) Weak and strong gels and the emergence of the amorphous solid state. Gels 4, 19.Google ScholarPubMed
Duteurtre, G (2007) Trade and development of dairy production in West Africa: a review. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux 60, 209–223.Google Scholar
Eroglu, A, Bayrambas, K, Eroglu, Z, Toker, OS, Mustafa, TY, Karaman, S and Dogan, M (2014) Steady, dynamic, creep/recovery, and textural properties of yoghurt/molasses blends: temperature sweep tests and applicability of Cox-Merz rule. Food Science and Technology International 22, 31–46.Google Scholar
Irigoyen, A, Arana, I, Castiella, M, Torre, P and Ibanez, FC (2005) Microbiological, physicochemical, and sensory characteristics of kefir during storage. Food Chemistry 90, 613–620.Google Scholar
Jans, C, Meile, L, Kaindi, DWM, Kogi-Makau, W, Lamuka, P, Renault, P, Kreikemeyer, B, Lacroix, C, Hattendorf, J, Zinsstag, J, Schelling, E, Fokou, G and Bonfoh, B (2017) African fermented dairy products – overview of predominant technologically important microorganisms focusing on African Streptococcus infantarius variants and potential future applications for enhanced food safety and security. International Journal of Food Microbiology 250, 27–36.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.03.012Google ScholarPubMed
Karenzi, E, Fauconnier, M-L, Destain, J, Laurent, P and Thonart, P (2015) Technological features of selected Kivuguto strains during milk fermentation. Bioengineering and Bioscience 3, 13–22.Google Scholar
Kim, W (2014) The genus Lactococcus. In Holzapfel, WH and Wood, BJB (eds), Lactic Acid bacteria: Biodiversity and Taxonomy. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 429–443.Google Scholar
Koussou, MO, Grimaud, P and Mopate, LY (2007) Hygienic and physico- chemical quality of local milk and milk products sold in milk bars in Chad. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux 60, 45–49.Google Scholar
Larsen, N, Werner, BB, Vogensen, FK and Jespersen, L (2015) Effect of dissolved oxygen on redox potential and milk acidification by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a DL-starter culture. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 1640–1651.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, H, Liu, F, Kang, L and Zheng, M (2015) Study on the buffering capacity of wort. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 122, 138–142.Google Scholar
Lynch, KM, Zannini, E, Coffey, A and Arendt, EK (2018) Lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides in foods and beverages: isolation, properties, characterization, and health benefits. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 9, 155–176.10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012537Google ScholarPubMed
Reddy, MS, Vedamuthu, ER and Reinbold, GW (1971) A differential broth for separating the lactic streptococci. Journal of Milk and Food Technology 34, 43–45.Google Scholar
Ruas-Madiedo, P and de los Reyes-Gavilan, CG (2005) Methods for the screening, isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 843–856.Google ScholarPubMed
Russel, B and Diez-Gonzalez, F (1997) The effects of fermentation acids on bacterial growth. Advances in Microbial Physiology 39, 205–234.Google Scholar
Tankoano, A, Kabore, D, Savadogo, A, Soma, A, Fanou-Fogny, N, Compaore-Sereme, D, Hounhouigan, JD and Sawadogo-Lingani, H (2016) Evaluation of microbiological quality of raw milk, sour milk and artisanal yoghurt from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. African Journal of Microbiology Research 10, 535–541.Google Scholar
Tidona, F, Zago, M, Corredig, M, Locci, F, Contarini, G, Giraffa, G and Carminati, D (2016) Selection of Streptococcus thermophilus strains able to produce exopolysaccharides in milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology 69, 569–575.Google Scholar
Ustunol, Z (2014) Dairy starter cultures. In Özer, B and Akdemir-Evrendilek, G (eds), Dairy Microbiology and Biochemistry: Recent Developments. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp 39–67.10.1201/b17297-3Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bayili et al. supplementary material

Table S1 and Figures S1-S3

Download Bayili et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 553.2 KB