Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:25:43.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The action of calf rennet and other proteolytic enzymes on κ-casein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. C. Lawrence
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand
L. K. Creamer
Affiliation:
New Zealand Dairy Research Institute, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Summary

The hydrolysis of κ-casein by a number of rennets and other proteolytic enzymes has been followed by measuring the increase in opacity due to the formation of insoluble aggregates of para-κ-caseins. The stability of these precipitates varied markedly, some being solubilized rapidly by the further action of the enzyme. The turbidity obtained with certain enzymes was dependent upon the calcium ion concentration, indicating that the para-κ-caseins produced were not identical for all enzymes.

For high concentrations of calf rennet, the rate of aggregation was linear with respect to time. With low concentrations of enzyme, increase in turbidity was preceded by a lag period which was lengthened by decreasing the enzyme concentration or increasing the κ-casein concentration. This increase in lag is favoured by a high κ-casein/para-κ-casein ratio, suggesting that the aggregation of newly formed para-κ-casein is prevented by the unchanged κ-casein. In addition, small amounts of αs1- or β-caseins present in the κ-casein also markedly affected the aggregation of para-κ-casein, indicating that all 3 major casein components can inhibit the aggregation of para-κ-casein in the absence of calcium ions. In the light of these observations the possible role of protein-protein interactions in casein coagulation by calf rennet is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cheeseman, G. C. (1962). J. Dairy Res. 29, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. J. (1964). Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 21, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernstbom, C. A. (1965). In Fundamentals of Dairy Chemistry, chap. 12. (Eds. Webb, B. H. and Johnson, A. H..) Westport: Avi Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Foltmann, B. (1966). C. r. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg 35, 143.Google Scholar
Garnier, J. (1967). Biopolymers 5, 474.Google Scholar
Garnier, J., Ribadeau dumas, B. & Bbignon, G. (1964). 6th Int. Congr. Biochem. (Abst. II–65), p. 153.Google Scholar
Garnier, J., Yon, J. & Mocquot, G. (1964). Biochim. biophys. Acta 82, 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, G. H. & Swanson, A. M. (1965). J. Dairy Sci. 48, 1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipp, N. J., Groves, M. L., Custer, H. J. & Mcmeekin, J. L. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, H. A. (1967). Adv. Protein Chem. 22, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mocquot, G. & Garnier, J. (1965). J. agric. Fd Chem. 13, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nobie, R. W. & Waugh, D. F. (1965). J. Am. chem. Soc. 87, 2236.Google Scholar
Poulik, M. D. (1957). Nature, Lond. 180, 1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. P. (1966). J. Dairy Sci. 49, 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. M. (1967). Lab. Pract. 16, 968.Google Scholar
Wake, R. G. (1959). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 12, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. (1958). Discuss. Faraday Soc. 25, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F. & von Hippel, P. H. (1956). J. Am. chem. Soc. 78, 4576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, D. F., Ludwig, M. L., Gillespie, J. M., Melton, B., Foley, M. & Kleiner, G. S. (1962). J. Am. chem. Soc. 84, 4929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittle, C. A. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 650.Google Scholar