Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T17:44:30.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of dietary palmitic and stearic acids on milk fat composition in the cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

R. C. Noble
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
W. Steele
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland
J. H. Moore
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland

Summary

The effects of the isocaloric replacement of starch in a low-fat concentrate mixture by either 5 or 10% ‘stearic acid’ (85% pure) or 10% ‘palmitic acid’ (85% pure) on the yield and composition of milk fat were investigated in a feeding experiment with 12 cows in mid-lactation. The concentrate mixtures were given with a highroughage diet that supplied daily 4·4kg of hay and 2·7kg of sugar-beet pulp.

The inclusion of 5 or 10% ‘stearic acid’ in the concentrate mixture decreased the concentrations and yields of 10:0, 12:0, 14:0, 14:1, 16:0 and 16:1 in the milk fat but increased the concentrations and yields of 18:0 and 18:1. When the concentrate mixture contained 10% ‘stearic acid’ the decreases in the yields of the shorter chain acids and the increases in the yields of 18:0 and 18:1 in the milk fat were more pronounced than when the concentrate mixture contained 5% ‘stearic acid’. The inclusion of 10% ‘stearic acid’ in the concentrate mixture also decreased the concentrations of 6:0 and 18:2 in the milk fat. The inclusion of 10% ‘palmitic acid’ in the concentrate mixture decreased the concentrations of 6:0, 8:0, 10:0, 12:0, 14:0, 14:1, 18:0 and 18:2 in the milk fat but increased the concentrations of 16:0 and 16:1. This dietary treatment also reduced the yields of 6:0, 10:0, 12:0, 14:0 and 18:2 but increased the yields of 4:0, 16:0 and 16:1 in the milk fat. The inclusion of 5% ‘stearic acid’ or 10% ‘palmitic acid’ in the concentrate mixture increased the yield of total milk fat.

The inclusion of 10% ‘palmitic acid’ or 10% ‘stearic acid’ in the concentrate mixture increased the relative proportions of propionic and iso-butyric acids in the rumen liquor but decreased the proportions of η-butyric and valeric acids. The inclusion of ‘stearic acid’ at the level of 5% in the concentrate mixture increased the relative proportions of iso-butyric and iso-valeric acids but decreased the proportion of butyric acid in the rumen liquor.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bickerstaffe, R. & Annison, E. F. (1968). Biochem. J. 108, 47 P.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn.London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Cottyn, B. G. & Boucque, C. V. (1968). J. agric. Fd Chem. 16, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganguly, J. (1960). Biochim. biophys. Acta 40, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbitt, K. S. (1966). Biochim. biophys. Acta 116, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howanitz, P. J. & Levy, H. R. (1965). Biochim. biophys. Acta 106, 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, K. & Seeley, R. C. (1966). Nature, Lond. 212, 1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S., Singh, V. N. & Keren-Paz, R. (1965). Biochim. biophys. Acta 98, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. H. & Steele, W. (1968). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. & Dils, R. (1966). Biochim. biophys. Acta 125, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968a). J. Dairy Res. 35, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968b). J. Dairy Res. 35, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968c). J. Dairy Res. 35, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, W. & Moore, J. H. (1968d). J. Dairy Res. 35, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E., Rook, J. A. F. & Hall, A. J. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar