Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T20:11:27.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preservative action of 11S (glycinin) and 7S (β-conglycinin) soy globulin on bovine raw milk stored either at 4 or 25 °C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2013

Ali O Osman
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig Univeristy, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
Samir A Mahgoub
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig Univeristy, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
Mahmoud Z Sitohy*
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig Univeristy, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: mzsitohy@hotmail.com

Abstract

Considerable inhibitory antibacterial actions were exerted by the soybean 11S subunit comparable with nisin on the proliferation of total viable count, Pseudomonas count and Enterobacteriaceae count in bovine milk stored at 4 or 25 °C for 30 d and 48 h, while 7S and lysozyme were much less effective. The maximum magnitudes of bacterial reduction by 11S and nisin were in the range 2–4 log CFU/ml. The proliferation of 3 pathogenic bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7) artificially inoculated into raw milk stored at 4 or 25 °C were particularly and significantly (P<0·05) reduced by 11S subunit and nisin (0·5% w/v), but only slightly by 7S and moderately by lysozyme. Lactose consumption, acidity development and casein degradation during storage of bovine raw milk were attenuated during storage at 4 or 25 °C and sensorial traits were better maintained by supplementation with 11S (0·5% w/v). 11S subunit may be used a safely food preservative, if permitted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC 1997 Official Methods of Milk Analysis. 16th edition. 3rd Revision Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
Conner, DE 1993 Naturally occurring compounds. In Antimicrobials in Foods. pp. 441468 (Ed. Davindson, PM & Branen, AL). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Crudden, A, Afoufa-Bastien, D, Fox, PF, Brisson, G & Kelly, AL 2005 Effect of hydrolysis of casein by plasmin on the heat stability of milk. International Dairy Journal 15 10171025Google Scholar
Davies, EA, Bevis, HE & Delves-Broughton, J 1997 The use of the bacteriocin as a preservative in ricotta type cheeses to control the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Letter Applied Microbiology 24 343346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dogan, B & Boor, KJ 2003 Genetic diversity and spoilage potentials among Pseudomonas spp. isolated from fluid milk products and dairy processing plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69 130138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, M, Gilles, KA, Hamilton, JK, Rebers, PA & Smith, F 1956 Calorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28 350356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dűring, K, Porsch, P, Mahn, A, Brinkmann, O & Gieffers, W 1999 The non-enzymatic microbicidal activity of lysozymes. FEBS Letter 449 93100Google Scholar
Fox, PF, Power, P & Cogan, TM 1989 Isolation and molecular characteristics. In Enzymes of Psychrotrophs in Raw Foods. pp. 57120 (Ed. McKellar, RC). Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press. Fox, P.F. Academic press, pp. 2340–2351Google Scholar
Frank, JF, Christen, GL & Bullerman, LB 1992 Tests for groups of microorganisms. In Standard Methods for Examination of Dairy Products. pp. 271276 (Ed. Marshall, RT). 16th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health AssociationGoogle Scholar
Haddadin, MS, Ibrahim, SA & Robinson, RK 1996 Preservation of raw milk by activation of the lactoperoxidase system. Food Control 7 149152Google Scholar
Jay, JM 2000 Modern Food Microbiology, 6th edition. Gaithersburg, MD: AspenGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, BJ & Gruppen, H 2008 Identification of strong aggregating regions in soy glycinin upon enzymatic hydrolysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 38183827Google Scholar
Laemmli, UK 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227 680685Google Scholar
Macedo, MLR, Matos, DGG, Machado, OLT, Marangoni, S & Novello, JC 2000 Trypsin inhibitor from Dimorphandra mollis seeds: purification and properties. Phytochemistry 54 553558Google Scholar
Mahgoub, S, Sitohy, M & Osman, A 2011 Inhibition of growth of pathogenic bacteria in raw milk by legume protein esters. Journal of Food Protection 74 14751481Google Scholar
Mathur, NB, Dwarkadas, AM, Sharma, VK, Saha, K & Jain, N 1990 Anti-infective factors in preterm human colostrum. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 79 10391044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maisnier-Patin, S, Deschamps, N, Tatini, SR & Richard, J 1992 Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in Camembert cheese made with a nisin-producing starter. Lait 72 249263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, P, Fernández-García, E & Nuñez, M 2003 Caseinolysis in cheese by Enterobacteriaceae strains of dairy origin. Letters in Applied Microbiology 37 410414Google Scholar
Mufandaedza, J, Viljoen, BC, Feresu, SB & Gadaga, TH 2006 Antimicrobial properties of lactic acid bacteria and yeast-LAB cultures isolated from traditional fermented milk against pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis strains. International Journal of Food Microbiology 108 147152Google Scholar
Munsch-Alatossava, P, Gursoy, O & Alatossava, T 2010 Potential of nitrogen gas (N2) to control Psychrotrophs and mesophiles in raw milk. Microbiological Research 165 122132Google Scholar
Nagano, T, Hirotsuka, M, Mori, H, Kohyama, K & Nishinari, K 1992 Dynamic viscoelastic study on the gelation of 7S globulin from soybeans. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40 941944Google Scholar
Nielsen, NC 1985 The structure and complexity of the 11S polypeptides in soybeans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 62 16801686Google Scholar
Pan, Y, Shiell, B, Wan, J, Coventry, MJ, Roginski, H & Lee, A 2007 The antimicrobial activity and molecular characterization of amidated bovine lactoferrin. International Dairy Journal 17 606616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. 2003 SAS version 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Shai, Y 2002 Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 66 236248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sitohy, M, Mahgoub, S & Osman, A 2011 Controlling psychrotrophic bacteria in raw buffalo milk preserved at 4 C with esterified legume proteins. LWT-Food Science and Technology 44 16971702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitohy, MZ, Mahgoub, SA & Osman, AO 2012 In vitro and in situ antimicrobial action and mechanism of glycinin and its basic subunit. International Journal of Food Microbiology 154 1929Google Scholar
Utsumi, S 1992 Plant food protein engineering. In Advances in .Food and Nutrition Research. pp. 89–20 (Ed. Kinsella, JE). Vol. 36. San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar