Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:55:05.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of 17 mesophilic lactic Streptococcus bacteriophages to pasteurization and spray-drying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Marie-Christine Chopin
Marie-Christine Chopin
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Laboratoire de Recherches de Technologie Laitière, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

For 17 phages active against Streptococcus cremoris, Str. lactis and Str. lactis subsp. diacetylactis, the killing efficiency of pasteurization (log No/N) at 72°C for 15 s in skim-milk showed large variations from > 6 to 0; the efficienty of killing during spray-drying ranged from 3.7 to 0.2 and phages survived well storage of milk powder at room temperature. Destruction in a heat exchanger was found to be greater than that calculated from biphasic curves obtained by heating phages in sealed ampoules. No relationship was established between lytic classification of phages and their heat resistance.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 131 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. H. (1959). Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adda, J. & Grosclaude, G. (1967). Annates de Technologie Agricole 16, 301–308.Google Scholar
Babos, P. & Kassanis, B. (1963). Virology 20, 490–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopin, M. -C., Chopin, A. & Roux, C. (1976). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 32, 741–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daoust, D. R., El-Bisi, H. M. & Litsky, W. (1965). Applied Microbiology 13, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daudin, J. D. & Cerf, O. (1977). Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Technologie 10, 203–207.Google Scholar
Farkhondbh, A. (1978). International Dairy Congress 20, Paris, Lecture 17pp.Google Scholar
Heap, H. A. & Lawrence, R. C. (1977). New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 12, 213–218.Google Scholar
Heap, H. A., Limsowtin, G. K. Y. & Lawrence, R. C. (1978). New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 13, 16–22.Google Scholar
Hiatt, C. W. (1964). Bacteriological Reviews 28, 150–163.Google Scholar
International Dairy Federation (1970). IDF Standard 49B.Google Scholar
Koka, M. & Mikolajcik, E. M. (1967). Journal of Dairy Science 50, 1025–1031.Google Scholar
Koka, M. & Mikolajcik, E. M. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 853–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. C., Heap, H. A., Limsowtin, G. & Jarvis, A. W. (1978). Journal of Dairy Science 61, 1181–1191.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. C., Thomas, T. D. & Terzaghi, B. E. (1976). Journal of Dairy Research 43, 141–193.Google Scholar
Martley, F. G. & Accolas, J. P. (1978). International Dairy Congress 20, Paris E, 555.Google Scholar
Patch, C. T. (1959). Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 81, 273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, L. E., Lowrie, R. J. & Lawrence, R. C. (1974). Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 29, 105.Google Scholar
Pflug, I. J. & Schmidt, C. F. (1968). Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, pp. 63–105. (Eds Lawrence, C. A. & Block, S. S..) Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Smith, L. S. & Krueger, A. P. (1952). Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 81, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sozzi, T., Poulin, J. M. & Maret, R. (1978). Journal of Dairy Research 45, 259–265.Google Scholar
Stamatin, N. (1963). Annales de l'Institut Pasteur 105, 515–523.Google Scholar
Stumbo, C. R. (1973). Thermobacteriology in Food Processing, 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R., Tierney, J. T., Larkin, E. P., Read, R. B. Jr & Peeler, J. T. (1971). Applied Microbiology 22, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsaneva, K. (1973). Khranitelna Promishlenost 22 (8/9), 27–29. (Dairy Science Abstracts 36, 365.)Google Scholar
Tsaneva, K. (1974). Nauchni Trudove, Vissh Institutpo Khranitelnai V kusova Promishlenost 21, 211–217. (Dairy Science Abstracts 39, 450.)Google Scholar
Wilkowske, H. H., Nelson, F. E. & Parmelee, C. E. (1954). Applied Microbiology 2, 250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woese, C. (1960). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 83, 741–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeterian, M. (1968). Dissertation Abstracts B 28, 3807–3808.Google Scholar
Zottola, E. A. & Marth, E. H. (1966). Journal of Dairy Science 49, 1338–1342.Google Scholar