Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T10:25:38.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Jersey and Friesian cows to once a day milking and prediction of response based on udder characteristics and milk composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Vicki R. Carruthers
Affiliation:
Dairying Research Corporation, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
Stephen R. Davis
Affiliation:
Dairying Research Corporation, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
Arnold M. Bryant
Affiliation:
Dairying Research Corporation, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
Harold V. Henderson
Affiliation:
MAF Technology, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
Chris A. Morris
Affiliation:
MAF Technology, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
Peter J. A. Copeman
Affiliation:
Dairying Research Corporation, Ruakura Agricultural Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand

Summary

The response of dairy cows to once a day (OAD) milking was investigated in four trials. Two trials involved Friesians (F) and Jersey cows selected for high (HP) or low (LP) milk protein concentration. Trial 1 compared 74 HP, LP and F cows milked either OAD or twice daily (TAD) for 2 weeks in both mid and late lactation. Trial 2 compared 98 HP, LP and F cows milked OAD or TAD for 12 weeks in early lactation. Trial 3 investigated the repeatability of production loss by milking identical twin cows either OAD or TAD during three 1 week periods. Trial 4 compared the time course of milk production in 32 cows milked every 12 or 24 h for 72 h. Cows milked OAD produced 10–28% less milk and milk solids in early to mid lactation and 9–13% less in late lactation than cows milked TAD. Losses in fat and protein yield were slightly lower than those of milk. HP, LP and F cows did not differ in percentage loss in milk and milk solids in Trial 1, except for loss in protein yield which was lower for HP than LP and F cows. In Trial 2 the losses in milk and milk solids were lower for HP cows than for F cows but the other differences were not significant. Milk storage ability of the udder (hours worth of secretion) was higher and productivity of the udder was lower for HP cows than F cows. Levels of residual milk did not differ among groups. The loss in udder capacity during lactation was greater for cows milked OAD than for those milked TAD. The correlations for repeated estimates of percentage losses in yields of milk and milk solids between successive OAD periods ranged from 0·29 to 0·49. Secretion rate of cows milked OAD was lower during the second 12 h than the first 12 h during each 24 h milking interval. Prediction of OAD performance based on milk composition and udder characteristics was poor. A high level of residual milk was the factor most consistently associated with high loss on OAD milking.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carruthers, V. R. & Copeman, P. J. A. 1990 Once a day milking. What are the effects on productivity? Dairyfarming Annual (Massey University) 42 7578Google Scholar
Carruthers, V. R., Davis, S. R. & Copeman, P. J. A. 1993 Effect of oxytocin, machine stripping and milking rate on production loss of cows milked once a day. Journal of Dairy Research 60 1318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claesson, O., Hansson, A., Gustafsson, N. & Brännäng, E. 1959 Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XVII. Once-a-day milking compared with twice-a-day milking. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 9 3858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. R., Farr, V. C. & Henderson, H. V. 1987 Relationship of udder capacity of Friesian and Jersey cows to yield reduction under extended milking intervals. Proceedings of the 4th AAAP Animal Science Congress, p. 151Google Scholar
Davis, S. R. & Hughson, G. A. 1988 Measurement of functional udder capacity in lactating Jersey cows. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39 11631168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. R., Hughson, G. A. & Bryant, A. M. 1983 Differences in the extent of mammary development between Jersey cows of high or low genetic merit. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 43 7172Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W., Wilson, G. F., Mackenzie, D. D. S. & Purchas, J. 1992 The effects of milking once daily throughout lactation on performance of dairy cows grazing pasture. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 52 1316Google Scholar
L'Huillier, P. J., Davis, S. R., Carruthers, V. R., Morris, C. A. & Bryant, A. M. 1989 Development of cattle of superior genotypes: Novel approaches to increasing tolerance of dairy cows to extended milking intervals. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 49 5763Google Scholar
Shinde, Y. 1978 Role of milking in initiation and maintenance of lactation in the dairy animals. In Physiology of Mammary Glands, pp. 347460 (Eds Yokoyama, A., Mizuno, H. and Nagasawa, H.). Baltimore, MD: University Park PressGoogle Scholar
Silver, I. A. 1956 Vascular changes in the mammary gland during engorgement with milk. Journal of Physiology 133 65P66PGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F. & Dodd, F. H. 1965 The effect of incomplete milking or of an extended milking interval on the yield and composition of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Research 32 237248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, C. J. & Peaker, M. 1990 Antocrine control in milk secretion. Journal of Agricultural Science 114 235238CrossRefGoogle Scholar