Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:02:31.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal inactivation of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase and Enterococcus faecium in milk-based systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Shailam S. Patel  and
R. Andrew Wilbey
Shailam S. Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, and Technology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AP, UK
R. Andrew Wilbey
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, and Technology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AP, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Untreated whole milk, skim milk, sweetened milks, sweetened and unsweetened creams and ice-cream mixes were preincubated with a culture of Enterococcus faecium, then subjected to heat treatment in a pilot-scale plate heat exchanger using a hold of 15 s at 76°C. The liquids were examined for γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTP) activity and total streptococcal count before and after heat treatment and the results plotted against water activity (aw). There was a good correlation between reduction in GGTP activity, destruction of streptococci and aw, demonstrating the potential of the enzymic assay for assessing the severity of HTST heat treatments above the minimum for pasteurization.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 263 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A. T., Anderson, M. & Goodenough, P. W. 1987 A study of the heat stabilities of a number of indigenous milk enzymes. Journal of Dairy Research 54 237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1980 Reduced water activity. In Microbial Ecology of Foods, vol. 1. Factors Affecting Life and Death of Microorganisms, pp. 70–92. (Ed. International Commission on Microbial Specifications for Foods). London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Balrd-Parker, A. C., Boothroyd, M. & Jones, E. 1970 The effect of water activity on the heat resistance of heat sensitive and heat resistant strains of Salmonellae. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 33 515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumrucker, C. R. 1979 γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase of bovine milk membranes: distribution and characterization. Journal of Dairy Science 62 253–258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, H. D., Cavanagh, C. F., Higgins, J. L. & Wilbey, R. A. 1990 Assessment of the heat treatment of ice cream mixes by enzyme assay. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 43 67–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Aoust, J. Y. 1977 Salmonella and the chocolate industry. A review. Journal of Food Protection 40 718–727CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J. G. & Wilbey, B. A. 1990 Microbiology of cream and dairy desserts. In Dairy Microbiology. The Microbiology of Milk Products, 2nd edn, vol. 2, pp. 41–108 (Ed. Robinson, R. K.). London: Elsevier Applied ScienceGoogle Scholar
Difco, 1984 Dehydrated Culture Media and Reagents for Microbiology, 10th edn.Detroit, MI: Difco LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, M. W. 1986 Use of milk enzymes as indices of heat treatment. Journal of Food Protection 49 696–705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrigan, W. F. & McCance, M. E. 1976 Laboratory Methods in Food and Dairy Microbiology, pp. 25–29. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Kitchen, B. J. 1985 Indigenous milk enzymes. Developments in Dairy Chemistry—3. Lactose and Minor Constituents, pp. 239–279 (Ed. Fox, P. F.). London: Elsevier Applied Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
McKellar, R. C., Emmons, D. B. & Farber, J. 1991 Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in milk and butter as an indicator of heat treatment. International Dairy Journal 1 241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumder, G. C. & Ganguli, N. C. 1972 γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase in milk. 1. Certain parameters influencing its activity. Milchwissenschaft 27 296–299Google Scholar
Patel, S. S. & Wilbey, R. A. 1989 Heat exchanger performance: γ-glutamyl transpeptidase assay as a heat treatment indicator for dairy products. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 42 79–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, S. S. & Wilbey, R. A. 1990 Heat exchanger performance: the use of food colourings for estimation of minimum residence time. Journal of the Society of Dairy Technology 43 25–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, B. A. 1979 Measurement of water activity in foods: a review. Journal of Food Protection 42 668–674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riemann, H. 1969 Food processing and preservation effects. In Food-borne Infections and Intoxications, pp. 489–535 (Ed. Riemann, H.). New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. C. & Tramer, J. 1954 Reactivation of milk phosphatase following heat treatment. III. Journal of Dairy Research 21 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar