Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Wanting to be wanted: a comparative study of incidence and severity in indirect complaint on the part of French and English language teaching assistants


Using data from the ESRC funded project Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication (PIC), this paper applies contrastive quantitative and qualitative analysis to data derived from oral statements, logbooks and retrospective reports by language teaching assistants in France and England. The data concerns their ‘rapport’ (Spencer-Oatey, 2003; 2005) with the members of staff responsible for their professional supervision and the paper assesses complaint behaviour across the two national groups. Basing our study on computer recorded discourse segments taxonomically codified as ‘negative assessment’, we show that the incidence of ‘indirect’ complaint (Boxer, 1993) is significantly higher among English assistants than among their French counterparts. A revised model for measuring ‘severity’ (House and Kasper, 1981; Olshtain and Weinbach, 1993) is applied to the data using corpus linguistic techniques. Its findings demonstrate that English assistants also complain more ‘severely’ than their French peers. Nevertheless, the difference in linguistic behaviour between individuals within each group is shown to be greater than that between the two national groups, implying that personality is a stronger determinant of cultural outlook than nationality.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Robert Crawshaw, Department of European Languages and Cultures, Lancaster University, Lancashire, LA1 4YN,
Hide All
Boxer D. (1993). Social distance and speech behavior: the case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics, 19: 103125.
Brown P. and Levinson S. (1978). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conley T. (1994). Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crawshaw R. and Harrison J. (2007). Politics and pragmatics in the cross-cultural management of ‘rapport’. Language and Intercultural Communication, Vol. 7 (3)217239.
Culpeper J., Crawshaw R. and Harrison J. (2008). Activity types as a bridge for micro and macro (politeness) research: contexts of culture in interactions between student foreign language assistants and their supervisors in schools in France and England. Multilingua: 297–324.
D'Amico-Reisner L. (1985). An Ethnographic Study of Disapproval Exchanges. Cit. Boxer (1993). Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Glaser B. and Strauss A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Halliday M. and Matthieson C. (2004). A Functional Grammar of English. Second edition, London: Arnold.
House J. and Kasper G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In: Coulmas F. (ed.), Conversational Routine. Explorations in Sstandardised Communication Situations and Pre-patterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton, pp.157185.
Köhl M. (2006). ‘Rotten Service!!’ or ‘Nie wieder!!!!!!’ – Complaining in British and German electronic discourse. Unpublished paper delivered at 31st International LAUD Symposium, Intercultural Pragmatics. Landau, March 2006.
Leech G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech G. and Svartvik J. (1994). A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.
Martinet A. (1979). Grammaire fonctionnelle du français. Paris: Didier.
Olshtain E. and Weinbach L. (1987). Complaint: a study of speech-act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew. In: Bertucelli-Papi M. and Verschuren J. (eds), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.195208.
Olshtain E. and Weinbach L. (1993). Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining. In: Kasper G. and Blum-Kulka S. (eds), Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108122.
Richards L. and Richards T. (1991). The transformation of qualitative research: computational paradigms and research processes. In: Fielding N. and Lee R. (eds), Using Computers in Qualitative Research. London: Sage, pp. 3853.
Spencer-Oatey H. (2005). (Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships. Journal of Politeness research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, Vol. 1.1: 95119.
Spencer-Oatey H. (2003). Managing Rapport in intercultural business interactions: a comparison of two Chinese-British welcome meetings. Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 24 (1): 3346.
Trosborg A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Crawshaw R. (2005). Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication: interim report on the PIC project to the British Council and the ESRC
Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication: the website of the PIC Project:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of French Language Studies
  • ISSN: 0959-2695
  • EISSN: 1474-0079
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-french-language-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 128 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.