Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Calculating correct compilers

  • PATRICK BAHR (a1) and GRAHAM HUTTON (a2)
Abstract

In this article, we present a new approach to the problem of calculating compilers. In particular, we develop a simple but general technique that allows us to derive correct compilers from high-level semantics by systematic calculation, with all details of the implementation of the compilers falling naturally out of the calculation process. Our approach is based upon the use of standard equational reasoning techniques, and has been applied to calculate compilers for a wide range of language features and their combination, including arithmetic expressions, exceptions, state, various forms of lambda calculi, bounded and unbounded loops, non-determinism and interrupts. All the calculations in the article have been formalised using the Coq proof assistant, which serves as a convenient interactive tool for developing and verifying the calculations.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Adams, N., Kranz, D., Kelsey, R., Rees, J., Hudak, P. & Philbin, J. (1986) ORBIT: An optimizing compiler for scheme. In Proceedings of the 1986 SIGPLAN Symposium on Compiler Construction. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 219–233.
Ager, M. S., Biernacki, D., Danvy, O. & Midtgaard, J. (2003a) A functional correspondence between evaluators and abstract machines. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 8–19.
Ager, M. S., Biernacki, D., Danvy, O. & Midtgaard, J. (2003b) From Interpreter to Compiler and Virtual Machine: A Functional Derivation. Technical Report RS-03-14. BRICS, Department of Computer Science, Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus.
Appel, A. (1991) Compiling with Continuations. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Backhouse, R. (2003) Program Construction: Calculating Implementations from Specifications. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Bahr, P. (2014) Proving correctness of compilers using structured graphs. Functional and Logic Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8475. Springer International Publishing, pp. 221237.
Chase, D. (1994a) Implementation of exception handling, Part I. J. C Lang. Transl. 5 (4), 229240.
Chase, D. (1994b) Implementation of exception handling, Part II. J. C Lang. Transl. 6 (1), 2032.
Day, L. E. & Hutton, G. (2014) Compilation à la Carte. In Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Implementation and Application of Functional Languages. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 13–24.
Dybjer, P. (1994) Inductive families. Formal Asp. Comput. 6 (4), 440465.
Hutton, G. (2007) Programming in Haskell. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, G. & Wright, J. (2004) Compiling exceptions correctly. Mathematics of Program Construction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3125. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 211227.
Hutton, G. & Wright, J. (2007) What is the meaning of these constant interruptions? J. Funct. Program. 17 (06), 777792.
Letouzey, P. (2008) Extraction in Coq: An overview. Logic and Theory of Algorithms: 4th Conference on Computability in Europe, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5028. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
McCarthy, J. & Painter, J. (1967) Correctness of a compiler for arithmetic expressions. Mathematical Aspects of Computer Science, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, vol. 19. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA: pp. 3341.
McKinna, J. & Wright, J. (2006) A Type-Correct, Stack-Safe, Provably Correct Expression Compiler in Epigram. Unpublished manuscript.
Meijer, E. (1992) Calculating Compilers. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Reynolds, J. C. (1972) Definitional interpreters for higher-order programming languages. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 717–740.
Sculthorpe, N., Farmer, A. & Gill, A. (2013) The HERMIT in the tree: Mechanizing program transformations in the GHC Core language. Implementation and Application of Functional Languages 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8241. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
Sestoft, P. (1997) Deriving a lazy abstract machine. J. Funct. Program. 7 (03), 231264.
Spivey, M. (1990) A functional theory of exceptions. Sci. Comput. Program. 14 (1), 2542.
Steele, G. L. Jr., (1978) Rabbit: A Compiler for Scheme. Technical Report AI-TR-474. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT AI Lab.
Thielecke, H. (2002) Comparing control constructs by double-barrelled CPS. Higher-Order Symb. Comput. 15 (2–3), 141160.
Wadler, P. (1989) Theorems for free! In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architecture. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
Wand, M. (1982a) Deriving target code as a representation of continuation semantics. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4 (3), 496517.
Wand, M. (1982b) Semantics-directed machine architecture. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 234–241.
Winskel, G. (1993) The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages – An Introduction, Foundation of Computing Series. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Functional Programming
  • ISSN: 0956-7968
  • EISSN: 1469-7653
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-functional-programming
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 301 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Calculating correct compilers

  • PATRICK BAHR (a1) and GRAHAM HUTTON (a2)
Submit a response

Discussions

No Discussions have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *