Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-b6fb2 Total loading time: 0.514 Render date: 2021-09-27T02:17:27.031Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Kettle Holes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

R. P. K. Clark*
Affiliation:
Education Centre, New University of Ulster, Coleraine, County Londonderry, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An alternative origin and significance for kettle holes is considered. Kettles among some kame tracts may be due not to melt of buried ice but rather represent the location of ice pillars or roof pendants among stratified subglacial deposits.

Résumé

Résumé

On considère une autre origine et signification pour marmites de glacier. Les marmites parmi quelques traces de “Kame” ne pourraient être dues à la fonte de glace ensevelie mais représentent plutôt la position de colonnes de glace ou de pendants de toits au milieu des dépôts sous-glaciaires stratifiés.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Für Sölle wird eine andersartige Entstehung und Bedeutung erwogen. Kessel in einigen Kames-Feldern sind eventuell nicht auf das Schmelzen verschütteten Eises zurückzuführen sondern kennzeichnen eher die Lage von Eissäulen oder Dachgehängen innerhalb der geschichteten Grundmoräne.

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1969

Appended to Reference WhiteWhite’s (1964) account of Whittlesey’s early description and explanation of kettle holes is an editorial résumé of Reference FlintFlint’s ([1957]) statements on the origin of kettle holes. All the modes of origin summarized there involve ice in a burial-thaw sequence, including certain propositions that:

  • i. Kettles are hollows in drift which are due to the melting out of glacier ice that had been wholly or partially buried.

  • ii. Kettles are especially associated with ice termini and zones of thinning.

  • iii. Kettles are frequently associated with stratified drift.

  • iv. Hollows of different origin in drift are not kettles.

Clearly, the consequences which flow from these assertions include the attraction of using kettles as diagnostic features despite the lack of very clear criteria for confirming that a hollow originated in a certain way. Inherent in this may be a tendency to assume that most hollows in stratified drift are kettles (sensu stricto Reference FlintFlint, [1957]), and that the presence of kettles among kames is indicative of marginal or near-marginal location at the time of supposed burial. The current development of kettles in and among eskers and pro-glacial sediments through the melting of buried glacier ice has been described in some detail from southern Iceland by Reference PricePrice (1969).

An examination of major commonly used geomorphology texts disclosed no important variation in description and explanation of kettles; indeed the phraseology often corresponds quite closely. The main points revealed by comparison are some lack of precision about size and shape, and the commonly used synonyms “pit” and “pitted” for “kettle” and “kettled”. The conclusion is that Flint’s views represent the consensus upon the nature of kettles.

The purpose of this note is to suggest that, notwithstanding clear evidence that some depressions do form in that way, misleading results may derive from uncritical acceptance of the usual interpretation of kettles among kames and eskers. The stratified deposits of these mounds and ridges frequently show normal faulting. This may occur within the deposits where some settling of whatever origin appears to have taken place; it may also occur adjacent to sloping sides, including some steep enough to be described as ice-contact slopes. In neither location is the faulting in itself diagnostic of the melting of covered glacier ice.

It is also common to find a situation where the surface of the kamiform feature and the upper undisturbed bedding of the deposit are conformable and within the range of dip to be expected in water-lain sediments. In these cases it is probable that the feature would retain its final constructional form virtually intact. In asymmetric cross-sections the steeper side may appear as a constructional feature of steep bedding, sometimes associated with a shift of the crest line during accumulation towards or away from the gentler side, or be characterized by chaotic dumping of sediment during build-up. It may also be a faulted side but it is clear that the steeper side of the feature is not always a collapsed side.

Enclosed hollows are so characteristic of some kame tracts as to lead to them being called kettle moraines. Enclosed depressions also frequently result from the branching and rejoining of eskers, as is especially well seen where thinning ice has very recently revealed these rather fragile features. Flanking hollows often aligned parallel to eskers are recognized as being frequent and integral parts of the land-form complex.

It is important to note that undisturbed constructional slopes in kame and esker systems may form, wholly or in part, the sides of enclosed hollows. It is thus seen that not all hollows are due to the melting out of buried ice (glacier or otherwise) for many show no signs of subsidence. Rather they are locations of non-sedimentation.

Studies of deglaciation phenomena have increasingly and convincingly shown that many kames and/or eskers are the result of subglacial sedimentation in single or multitudinous passages beneath ice, the flow of water and the deposition of sediment contributing to undermelt and to the localized raising of the ice base. From an environment of this type, the enclosed depressions (the present kettle holes) indicate the position of former ice pillars or roof pendants. They are thus contemporaneous with the kames or eskers, and together with them form the mould of the undersurface of the ice at the time of last significant sedimentation. This type of melt and sedimentation at the base of the ice is less likely to leave many buried blocks to melt out later than marginal sediment accumulation enveloping thinning ice.

In addition, it is increasingly being realized that as the surface gradients of ice masses may decline and the whole lose mobility while remaining thick, then very broad zones of simultaneously stagnant ice result. Consequently, sorted and stratified subglacial sediments with concomitant hollows may form at a distance from the ice margin. It may be noted that because the ice over these hollows is the thickest and has the lowest base it may gather the thickest skin of ablation moraine, and therefore on both counts it is the longest surviving ice. But this is not burial in the sense of the usual definition of kettles.

It is difficult to know how far from an ice margin, and under what thickness of ice, subglacial drainage can build irregular deposits. It is similarly difficult to determine the distance between specific landforms of subglacial origin and the contemporary ice margin when that margin, obscured by ablation moraine and possibly by outwash, is indistinct, and when, its position determined by continuous downwasting of the stagnant ice, it left little evidence of past locations. Reference GlenGlen (1954) has suggested that water might move under temperate ice masses up to about 200 m thick. British field workers have presented little supporting evidence, most conclusions appearing to reflect the limit of about 90 m suggested by Reference DerbyshireDerbyshire (1961). It is believed that some Norwegian eskers were built beneath ice more than 200 m thick (Reference GjessingGjessing, 1960), and there is evidence from Northumberland of water moving beneath ice 150 to 200 m thick (Reference ClarkClark, 1969). Such depths suggest locations far from ice margins, possibly over 100 km distant in the Norwegian examples. Indications from northern England are that, during the decline of the main Würm ice, kettles were produced at least 30 km from an ice margin.

In summary, it is suggested that certain types of enclosed hollow included in the class “kettle hole” are areas of non-sedimentation, and are not primarily due to the melting out of buried ice. Although they appear, in association with the constructional forms, to indicate stagnating or motionless ice, they cannot safely be used to locate ice margins. It is therefore suggested that the use of the term “kettle hole”, whether used descriptively or genetically, be refined and clarified, or that its considerable imprecision be recognized.

References

Clark, R. P. K. 1969. Aspects of glaciation in Northumberland. Proceedings. Cumberland Geological Society, Vol. 2, Pt. 4, p. 14065.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, E. 1961. Subglacial col gullies and the deglaciation of the north-east Cheviots. Institute of British Geographers. Transactions, No. 29, p. 3146.Google Scholar
Flint, R. F. [1957.] Glacial and Pleistocene geology. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Google Scholar
Gjessing, J. 1960. Isaysmeltningstidens drenering, dens forlep og formdannende virkning i Nordre Atnedalen med sammenlignende studier fra Nordre Gudbrandsdalen. Ad Novas (Oslo), Nr. 3.Google Scholar
Glen, J. W. 1954. The stability of ice-dammed lakes and other water-filled holes in glaciers. Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 2, No. 15, p. 31618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, R. J. 1969. Moraines, sandar, kames and eskers near Breidamerkurjökull, Iceland. Institute of British Geographers. Transactions, No. 46, p. 1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. W. 1964. Early discoverers. XIX. Early description and explanation of kettle holes: Charles Whittlesey (1808–1886). Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 5, No. 37, p. 11922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have Access
9
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Kettle Holes
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Kettle Holes
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Kettle Holes
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *