Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T21:23:41.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do all human urinary infections with Schistosoma mattheei Represent hybridization between S. haematobium and S. mattheei?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

F. J. Kruger  and
A. C. Evans
F. J. Kruger
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Diseases in a Tropical Environment of the South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 634, Nelspruit 1200, Republic of South Africa
A. C. Evans
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Diseases in a Tropical Environment of the South African Medical Research Council, P.O. Box 634, Nelspruit 1200, Republic of South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Enzyme electrophoresis indicated that all Schistosoma mattheei eggs passed in the urine of humans derive from S. mattheei females in copula with S. haematobium males. It appears that S. mattheei males do not reach sexual maturity in man; however, S. haematobium×S. mattheei males possibly do.

Keywords

Schistosoma mattheeiSchistosoma haematobiumhybridizationenzyme electrophoresisisoelectric focussing
Type
Research Note
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 330 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kruger, F. J. (1987) Enzyme electrophoresis of South African Schistosoma mattheei and S. haematobium. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 54, 93–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruger, F. J. (1988) Further observations on the electrophoretic characterization of South African Schistosoma mattheei and S. haematobium. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 55, 67–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruger, F. J. (1989) Hibridisasie tussen Schistosoma haematobium en Schistosoma mattheei (Trematoda: Schistosomatidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Potchefstroom University.Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L. (1929) Remarks on the habits and the pathogenesis of Schistosoma mattheei, together with notes on the pathological lesions observed in infested sheep. 15th Annual Report of the Director of Veterinary Services, Union of South Africa.Google Scholar
Pitchford, R. J.Cattle schistosomiasis in man in the Eastern Transvaal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 53, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitchford, R. J. (1961) Observations on a possible hybrid between the two schistosomes S. haematobium and S. mattheei. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 55, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutte, C. H. J, Jackson, T. F. H. G, Visser, P. S, De Kock, K. N. & Pretorius, S. J. (1983) False-positive reactions in the serological diagnosis of schistosomiasis. South African Medical Journal, 64, 239–240.Google ScholarPubMed
Southgate, V. R., Rollinson, D., Ross, G. C. & Knowles, R. J. (1982) Mating behaviour in mixed infections of Schistosoma haematobium and S. intercalatum. Journal of Natural History, 16, 491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. A. & Ross, G. C. (1980) Hybrids between Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei and their identification by isoelectric focusing of enzymes. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 74, 326–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, C. A. & Ross, G. C. (1983) Enzyme analysis of Schistosoma haematobium. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 61, 307–316.Google ScholarPubMed