Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T05:48:22.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inhibition phenomena mechanisms in experimental obeliscoidosis in rabbits. II. Local and systemic antibody responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

I. B. Helal
Affiliation:
Department of parasitology, Zoological Institute, University of Warszawa, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
H. Wedrychowicz
Affiliation:
Department of parasitology, Zoological Institute, University of Warszawa, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
E. Sinski
Affiliation:
Department of parasitology, Zoological Institute, University of Warszawa, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.
B. Bezubik
Affiliation:
Department of parasitology, Zoological Institute, University of Warszawa, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

A series of experiments was carried out using adult outbred Polish race rabbits of both sexes infected, during spring or autumn. with 10 000 larvae of Obeliscoides cuniculi, either fresh or stored at 4°C. Extracts of mucosal proteins and bile were collected at postmortem 6 or 12 weeks after infection. Antibody levels were determined in antisera. bile and stomach mucosa by haemagglutination and precipitation tests. Local antibody respones were demonstrated in the stomach and bile, and reactions were obtained with the tissue fluids by haemagglutination and precipitation tests with worm antigens and ES products. Additionally, some specific immunological response was observed in the circulation during the primary infection. These results suggest a clear-cut relationship between increased levels of these antibodies and either larval inhibition or worm expulsion during O. cuniculi infections.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, D. B. & Beh, K. J. (1981) Immunity acquired by sheep from an experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus. Interational Journal for parasitology, 11, 318386.Google ScholarPubMed
Byszewska-Szpocinska, E. & Stankiewicz, M. (1983) Immunological studies on experimental haemonchosis in sheep. III. Appearance of antibodies in sera and abomasal mucosae after single infections. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 28, 481488.Google Scholar
Dineen, J. K., Donald, A. D., Wagland, B. M. & Turner, J. H. (1965a) The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship. II. The response of sheep to primary and secondary infection with Nematodirus spathiger. Parasitology, 55, 163171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dineen, J. K., Donald, A. D., Wagland, B. M. & Offner, J. (1965b) The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship. III. The response of sheep to primary infection with Haemonchus contortus. Parasitology, 55, 515525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, A. D., Dineen, J. K., Turner, J. H. & Wagland, B. M. (1964) The dynamics of the host-parasite relationship. I. Nematodirus spathiger infection in sheep. Parasitology, 54, 527544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helal, I. B., Sinski, E. & Bezubik, B. (1987) Inhibition Phenomena mechanisms in experimental obeliscodosis in rabbits. 1. Parasitological evalution. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 32, in Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. D. (1973) Immunity and epidemiology of helminthiasis in grazing animals. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 21, 183194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maizels, R. M., De Savigny, D. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1984) Characterization of surface and excretory-secretory antigens of Toxocara canis infective larvae. Parasite Immunology, 6, 2327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, J. F. (1968) Immunity to helminths assiciated with the tissues. In: Immunity to Parasites (editor, Taylor, A. E. R.). Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 6789.Google Scholar
Ouchterlony, O. (1953) Antigen antibody reaction in gels. IV. Types of reactions in coordinated system of diffusion. Acta Pathologica and Microbilogica Scandinavica, 32, 231239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, S. W., Baker, N. F. & Raizes, G. S. (1966) Experimental Obeliscoides cuniculi infections in rabbits: comparison with Trichostrongylus and Ostertagia infections in cattle and sheep. Experimental Parasitology, 19, 163173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinski, E. (1975) Immunological inversitgations in experimental ostertagiosis in Sheep. III. Serological changes and analysis of antibodies in the sera and abomasal mucosa after single and multiple infections. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 23, 635–625.Google Scholar
Sinski, E. & Holmes, P. H. (1978) In vitro binding of 1gG and 1gA to Nippostrongylus brasiliensis measured by radioimmunoassay. Journal of Parasitology, 64, 189191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. D. & Christie, M. G. (1978) Resistance to Haemonchus cintortus: local and serum antibodies in Sheep immunised with irradiated larvae. International Journal for Parasitology, 8, 219223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollod, A. E. & Allen, J. R. (1971) Immunity to Obeliscoides cuniculi: chemical Suppression and Passive transfer. Juornal of Parasitology, 57, 339342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1978) Immunity to intestinal parasites. Nature, 273, 617620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wedrychowicz, H. (1986) Studies on the antigens of Ostertagia circumincta. III. Somatic and metabolic antigens of adult parasites. Acta Parasitologal polonica, 30, 111120.Google Scholar
Wedrychowicz, H., Abbott, E. M. & Holmes, P. H. (1984) Use of coproatibody measurement to assess the influence of local immune response of Sheep vaccinated aginst Haemonchus contortus. Research in Veterinary Science, 36, 240246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widrychowicz, H. & Bezubik, B. (1981) Studies on the antigens of Ostertagia circumcincta. I. Somatic antigens of infevctive larvae. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 28, 233245.Google Scholar
Wedrychowicz, H., Maclean, J. M. & Holmes, P. H. (1983) The detection and measurement of coproantibodies to Nippostronglyus brasiliensis in rast following a Primary infection. Parasite Immunology, 5, 277287.Google Scholar