Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:10:22.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some properties of the surface of nematode larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Michele Jungery
Affiliation:
National Institute for medical research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, U.K.
C. D. Mackenzie
Affiliation:
National Institute for medical research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, U.K.
Bridget M. Ogilvie
Affiliation:
National Institute for medical research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, U.K.

Abstract

The nature of complement binding to the surface to infective larvae of Trichinella spiralis and Nippostronaylus brasiliensis differs. When worms were incubated in serum from uninfected hosts, washed and incubated in fluorescent reagent the whole surface of T. spiralis fluoresced but in N. Brasiliensis fluorescence was confined to the anterior end and some internal organs. The outer structure of the cuticle of the T. spiralis larvae was shown not to contain ATP-ase, thus differing from many cell membranes.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barman, T. E. (1969) In: enzyme hand book vol. II, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, pp. 689690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, A. C. (1976) In: The Organization of Nematodes. Croll, N. A. (Editor). Academic Press, New York. pp. 107137.Google Scholar
Bird, A. C. (1980) The nematode cuticle and its surface. In: Nematodes as Biological Models. Aging and other model systems. Volume 2. Zuckeman, B. M. (Editor). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cesari, I. K., Simpson, A. J. & Evans, W. H. (1981) Properties of a series of tegumental membrane bound phosphohydrolase activities of Schistosoma mansoni. Biochemistry Journal, 198, 467473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caufield, J. P., Korman, G., Butterworth, A. E., Hogan, M. & David, J. R. (1980) The adherence of human neutrophils and eosinophils to Schistosomula: evidence for membrane fusion between cells and parasites. Journal of Cell Biology, 86, 4663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. J. & Kitts, W. D. (1971) Electrostatic forces affecting in vitro adherence of polymor-phonuclear leucocytes to the cuticle of protostrongylus larvae (nematoda). Journal of Parasitology, 57, 808814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, N. O. & Jorgensen, P. L. (1969) A qualitative biochemical and histochemical study of the lead method for localization of adenosine triphosphate-hydrolyzing enzymes. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 17, 443453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, C. D., Jungery, M., Taylor, P. M. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1980) Activation of complement, the induction of antibodies to nematode surfaces and the effect of these factors and leucocytes on worm survival in vitro. European Journal of Immunology, 10, 594601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackenzie, C. D., Jungery, M., Taylor, P. M. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1981) The in vitro interaction of eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages and mast cells with nematode surfaces in the presence of complement or antibodies. Journal of Pathology, 133, 161175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maizels, R. M., Philipp, M. & Ogilvie, B. M. (1982) Molecules on the surface of parasitic nematodes as probes of the immune response in infection. Immunological Reviews, 61, 109136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Palomo, A. (1978) Ultrastructural characterization of the cuticle of onchocerca volvulus microfilariae. Journal of Parasitology, 64, 127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padybula, H. A. & Herman, E. (1955) The specificity of the histochemical method for adenosine triphosphate. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 3, 161169.Google Scholar
Rutherford, T. A., Webster, J. M. & Barlow, J. S. (1977) Physiology nutrient uptake by the entomophilic nematode mermis nigrescens (Mermithidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 55, 17731871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar